Mangled Thoughts

The exposure of NASA’s fraud by McIntyre, through Hansen the head of its Goddard Institute for Space Studies, is becoming a major international scandal. There is an important detail one was unaware of until now:

“The institute’s figures are one of four data sets used by the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to come up with its doomsday scenarios.”

[Cold, Hard Facts, INVESTOR’S BUSINESS DAILY, 17/11/08]

The IPCC has always been corrupt, and has always resorted to fabrications as its arguments for the Greens’ lie, Co2 emissions causes global warming. The IPCC was not set up as scientific institute. It was set up for politicial reasons, careerist politicians and Statists seeking a club to weild against those they do not serve, the voters.

The IPCC and the whole ‘global varming’ brigage are insidious, keeping in clear view the Great lie was propagated by those fantatical diseased Leftists the Greens. Keep in view, the KGB established the Greens in the 1960’s, first in Germany, as a weapon with which to undermine the West.

The KGB’s reasoning, a front that had the appearance of a spontaneous protest movement would enjoy far greater success than any front that was directly tied to the KGB. They funded the Greens, they selected and trained its cadre, they wrote - as it were, its modus operandi. Putin and the KGB stand to collect if idiots like Wong and Rudd persist with what will be nothing less than criminal, Kyoto compliance and capital destruction day through Co2 taxes.

The recession, however, is concentrating the attention of the modest man in the street, who in increasing numbers is deeply disturbed that it is fraud and that compliance will mean their ruination. What the prospect is, is a major political shift which will prove a very nasty time for the diseased Left, and also the parasites who have wrecked the Liberal Party and betrayed genuine Liberal principles and Australians.

Again, the hard left dominated media in Australia is not reporting on the fraud perpetrated by NASA and Al Gore’s pal, Hansen. Telling the truth is not their commitment, at least when it crosses their aims - just look at, for example, that diseased, hard Leftist and lying bastard called a Geoff Elliot, of The Australian.

Hansen is a thug, by the way, who hold’s totalitarian views, and sees nothing wrong with diseased Leftist fronts such as the Greens committing acts of terrorism. This is the sort of thug Geoff Elliot holds up as a decent type. It is a telling not, revealing those driving the great Greens’ lie for the vicious creeps they truly are. Get stuffed, Wong and Rudd.

Time was eaten up today, by the investigation mentioned yesterday - there’s some smoke. So, tomorrow will be a festschrift of posts.

The Nazis were devoted to the cult of nature and to it equated man and animals. They banned vivisections on animals. They had the Jewish people to experiment on.

Peter Singer equates animals with man and holds, the ‘right to life’ is decided by whether anyone is a ‘person’. By this rubbery word, ‘person’, he includes animals. Singer holds some have less ‘rights’ to live than piglets. That, State ordered murder of some is moral. In asserting this, amongst many things,  he totally evades something very fundamental, inalienable rights and in their gravest force. There is a reason for this.

Singer’s notion of ‘rights’ has nothing to do with real rights and freedom, it has everything to do with justifying absolutism. The UN’s position is the same, the incipiently totalitarian definition of Rights. It must not be forgotten that:

In 1920 Permission to Destroy Life Unworthy of Life was published in Germany. Authored by a Professor Karl Binding in collaboration with Dr Alfred Hoche, the book categorised those who were to be killed…

Hoche and Binding’s ideas became respectable in Weimar Germany and provided the Nazi’s with the intellectual reasoning for their war of extermination against the senile, the retarded, the disabled, etc. And it was the Churches that stood up against this tide of barbarism, not leftwing journalists.

in [Singer’s] own words: “What the Nazis did was a totally different thing. They called their program euthanasia but it was not euthanasia because it was not for the good of the infants involved.”
But murdering people for their own good was part of the Nazi euthanasia program, as Hitler’s decree of the 1 September 1939 authorising euthanasia made clear:

“Reichleiter Bouhler and Dr Brandt are hereby instructed to extend the authority of physicians designated by name in such a manner that those… as it is humanly possible to judge, incurably sick may, after the most scrupulous assessment of their state of health, be granted a merciful death.”
The Nazis argued that society had a moral obligation to relieve parents of the suffering and distress that severely handicapped children imposed on them. This statement destroys Singer’s criticism…

Singer was run out of German Universities, and was opposed by undergraduates of Harvard who are also cripples.

Singer “publicly lamented the collapse of socialism (communism), once again revealing the greens’ socialist ideology.” This quote is from an article that includes other telling quotes and something else; the unprincipled, camotose, cowardly “Right” and spineless company directors and executives who see nothing wrong with the Greens’ cult of death. Another quote is apt:

Speaking for the German greens, Carl Amery stated:

We, in the green movement, aspire to a cultural model in which the killing of a forest will be considered more contemptible and more criminal than the sale of 6-year old children to Asian brothels. (Ibid., p. 169).

Mining Industry Caves in to Fanatical Greens

Regarding the Leftist front, Animals Australia, with others in suuport such as the Parkville, Melbourne based, “The Australian Catholic Study Circle for Animal Welfare”, their position is transparent - the force is unmistakeable. Equating piglets and children is not simply that children are the same as piglets. Children can be ‘legally murdered’. Those behind these fronts will deny it but, it is true.

The Animals Australia media campaign combines the above with another violent, direct abuse of children. It is aimed at getting at adults through children too, by the naked attempt to induce children to identify with piglets, and regard them as human too, while seeking to induce adults to view their children the same way.

Yes, this item recapitulates some points made in When advertising is propganda. Not, however, the full savagery of this disgusting propaganda and brainwashing effort. Yes, brainwashing - to manipulate those who listen to it, and see it on TV and in papers in to the above moral equivalence and into accepting their totalitarian lies as true.

Man is unique, and above all animals. This is what the diseased Left, including their pals who have penetrated the Church, are attacking, and supplanting with notions that are horrendous. Several things stand out:

1.The advertising agency responsible for producing Animals Australia’s propaganda campaign saw nothing wrong with it.
2. Media Companies saw nothing wrong with it in accepting the contract to transmit it.

The media companies did not react until they were flooded by complaints from the public. Then, only then did, it seems (I could be wrong on this - eg., is it still running on TV) have they pullede it.

The 3rd thing is, neither has the “Right” seen anything wrong with it. They have been a complete blank, matched by dumbness - total silence. Then, too many of them, beginning with Brendan Nelson, equate man with animals. So do the CIS and IPA - regulation and tax as the coercive measures to force people to behave the right way, the Watson position holding man as nothing but animals to be beaten and driven.

Truly disgusting. Another typical failure of the necrotic “Right”. Abysmal, truly appalling.

Cardinal Archbishop George Pell, concerned Catholics have mentioned whether you will investigate and take action against “The Australian Catholic Study Circle for Animal Welfare”? I happily agreed to mentioning the request in public. This treacherous, child abusing, diseased Leftist front is using the cover of the Church to push a position that is horrendous, and forget anti-Catholic, it is not even Christian. In the name of Christ, Trinity, and Church, Cardinal! Enough reason to act, Sir.

Alongside freedom of speech, the freedom of companies to advertise what they do skates on thin ice, with politicians, buoyed by Leftist fronts inventing novelties, out to eliminate it. What is not suppressed is propaganda as advertising, hard left propaganda. A bizarre example is coal based energy firms advertising how kyoto compliant they are becoming, and saving the Planet from Co2 emissions - the slogan is ‘green energy’.

Also irritating is those firms have taken to including little moralising sentiments, for over a year now, on customers’ accounts invoices. One boggles at the stupidity of the executives of these firms approving all this propaganda as advertising what they supply. Propaganda aimed at wiping out their companies.

Mr. Greg Lindsay of the Centre of Independent Studies has yet to explain to Liberals, Australians, and companies why economic destruction via carbon taxes is good for them. Oh, I know, having mastered the Hugh Morgan ‘theory of labour pricing’, Mr. Bob Day can demonstrate his economic penetration in this job. Lindsay can, as Morgan did on labour market pricing, write his lines.

Day being a generous donor to the CIS, this surely entitles him to not only a position on its board, as he has on the board of the HR Nicholls’ Society. It surely entitles him also to one pulitzer prize-winning ‘classic’ on why economic destruction day is fun published in his name; as he has on labour markets in the HR Nicholls Society.

I wonder where, since the day Mr. Day decided to take to politics and enjoy being buttered up by the economic illiterates and Liberal Party wreckers, where he stored his entrepreneurial brains. Surely he must realise his new chums could not even run a boarding kennel club for fleas. He should ask himself a question and answer it truthfully:

Would he employ any of them in his company, or commend them to other entrepreneurs?

If he answered this question truthfully, he must next ask himself, “why am I wasting my time and money on these incompetent buffoons”. I have digressed.

In the case of the energy firms, there is a qualification. Kennett, Stockdale and their ‘advisers’ in the anti-free market and anti-genuine Liberal Party clunk tanks the CIS and IPA did not establish the former Government monopoly in electricity production as a genuine free market enterprise. They ‘privatised’ it. The object was not serving customers through even more efficient production, thus at lower prices. It was to extract as much blood out of them as possible without being publicly exposed for larceny.

As not independent free market entities, they are still under the political interference of the Executive. What the Executive demands it gets, including Hard Left propaganda services and stuff the companies and, crucially, their customers.

Yet, there is a silver lining. It was related over the weekend, their advertising has been challenged under advertising ‘legislation’, as false advertising. The ground given is: the claim Co2 emissions causes climate change is scientific fraud. It would be embarrassing not only for the firms, but also the Federal and State Executives to have the lie tested in court, and watch it publicly exposed for the lie it is.

Due to the challenge, the companies are pulling the media propaganda. Is this really why they are pulling it, to avoid the lie being skewered in court? If so, they they are mendacious cowards. Does this retraction extend to the garbage they crayon in on invoices to customers, because it should?

That is the good news. There is, however, bad news. A Leftist front, called Animals Australia, launched a disgusting propaganda-brainwashing campaign, aimed at destruction of pig production, a couple of weeks ago. It has set a new low in the appalling propaganda stakes.

I’ve only heard the radio version, but it is disgusting enough. The voice spouting the lines could be that of a narcissistic, juvenile delinquent. It is supposed to be that of a piglet and the reason is, to identify piglets with children. It makes the totally false claim, one of its central propaganda lies, piglets have the same IQ as 8 year old children. Needless to say, it swiftly asserts, pork production is torture of piglets, therefore, children.

This ad is evil on two counts. The first is the objective, smash pork production. The second, the insidious child abuse involved. A deliberate effort at emotional blackmail or, since the expression is the flavour of Leftist liars, ‘emotional exploitation’ of children, and any adult who is intellectually, emotionally and morally feeble.

Notice they are equating animals and man, the doctrine the Nazis adopted, with horrendous consequences. Forget the rotten, corrupt Leftist liars behind this ad. What is the media doing carrying this thoroughly corrupt and evil advertisement? Oh, for the revenue, but are the media so corrupt as to perpetrate this monstrosity as legitimate advertising. Unfortunately, they are. It is dominated by diseased Leftists after all.

‘Animals Australia’ claims it “represents some 40 member societies and thousands of individual supporters throughout Australia”. Big deal. Any tiny group can set up multiple fronts - this is also telling about the inactive, sclerotic “Right” which can’t manage to lift a finger to run a single website effectively. However, even if it had the support of 5 million Australians, what they stand for remains evil. There is a problem:

The Greens is a minority hard Left front. Yet, it has made major inroads against freedom, and science. Why? Its members are committed true believers of their cult and, consequently, they committed time and energy to corrupting youth, brainwashing them and concentrating on cowardly, ignorant, idle politicians and their advisers. It worked. We now face carbon tax destruction day. It wasn’t vast donations that did it. It was their commitment, and the “Right” failed to attack them head on (not that they ever could), and countering where it counts most, convincing voters.

Another diseased Left front has also been dismissed by the stupid Right as merely a bunch of mung bean, bong-smoking dropouts, PETA. PETA is now close to realising one of its aims, the complete destruction of wool and lamb production in Australia. To achieve this, its intermediate target was to have mulesing outlawed. This is on the verge of being done. Next, is the long list of major companies refusing to carry Australian wool

What has been the action of the soporific ‘Right’? More inaction, cowardice, incompetence, and even betrayal. This includes the gutlessness and buffoonery of the Wool Industry Council, headed by Ian McLachlan.

What have producers received for their membership fees? Just another bunch of politicos and pr stuntmen. [First the Greens, now PETA.] General Patton never had time for such types. It couldn’t possibly be because if he had stuffed his staff with them, instead of destroying the Wermacht, they would have destroyed his brave armoured corps?

Many more Rightwing successes like these and economic destruction through Co2 taxes will be an obsolete, ‘diseased Leftist’ strategy. Funny, isn’t it, Mr. Day, how the CIS you generously fund is aligned with the diseased Left on securing this Stalinist aim.

One of its “member societies” is called, “The Australian Catholic Study Circle for Animal Welfare”. What’s the difficulty? It identifies its monstrous action as in the name of the Church. It isn’t Catholic and Christian. It is not the Church, and they are not speaking in the name of the faithful.

It’s a bunch of shallow, whining, Leftist bs., who shelter behind the Church as a cover. Thus they also cause great damage this way too. They are not proclaiming the gospel, not attesting it; they are perverting it to promote their aim. It is not the creed they profess; it is anti-Catholic and anti-Christian what they profess.

In, Follow up to, Rudd’s “Blasphemy Laws”, it was related an advertising trade mag, Adnews, whined about Rudd’s moves to ‘censor’ advertising. The mag didn’t put up a fight. It merely whined “why won’t some kind suger-daddy save us from the beast”. It then wailed, Rudd didn’t listen to their hero, Philip ‘Phuc Phil Adams’. So, to repeat;

What makes it all the more hilarious is that Philip Adams himself has attacked advertising firms. Not simply attacked them, but told the very lies Rudd is using as the excuse to impose the measures he is preparing. Either the ad-men are unbelievably naive, or…

As Brookesnews related, Adams equates advertising with paedophiles. The reason for this typical, psychopathic denunciation is:

Adams believes that creating brand-names and attractive products puts corporations like Nike and Reebok (on a par)

The only good advertising is vicious, diseased Left propaganda. Honest advertising of products and the companies producing them is a criminal offence. It is as well to end by repeating,

‘For the benefit of Adnews: the reason why the likes of Phuc Phil infest the advertising business is so they can make themselves wealthy, while contemplating immiserating millions of Australians, and lying on behalf of Stalinist thugs, without having to get their hands grotty in the driver of advertising, capital, production for markets, and serving nasty little scumbags called the modest consumer.

‘Mind, for altogether different reasons, the Right and the Liberal Party is stuffed with and wrecked by types who want to be wealthy but without getting their hands dirty in production too. This lot of retarded oafs is ably served by the CIS and the IPA, with the HR Nicholl’s Society also doing their bit to completely destroy free markets, and great genuine Liberal causes.
Splendid, splendid, just spiffing splendid.’

We can indeed thank the inert cowards of the hollow “Right” for such brutal ugliness as pumped out by the real, lying leftist animals, “‘Animals Australia”:

Australia’s Right, a bunch of bungling, ineffectual clowns whose notion of winning is to help the Left bleed Australians to death.

If it weren’t for the unpleasant fact the Victorian Liberal Party has been throttled by unprincipled,closed, indolent, statists, it is difficult to comprehend how could a couple of ignorant, dumbed down, thugs called Bracks and Brumby have made it onto any frontbench let alone emerge as successive premiers.

They have another thing in common. They were born to successful entrepeneurs for fathers. Unlike their dads, Steve Bracks and John Brumby are merely a pair of institutionalised thickheads, and this sums up the rest of their Cabinets and, sadly, pretty well sums up what sits opposite them. Wealthy, plastic jack-booted brats who don’t have a clue as to how their bread is buttered, and totally incapable of doing it for themselves. Thus, not a few in the “Right” could have said the same as ‘Deah Maximus Premier’:

If John Brumby has to pay a bit more for electricity, the fact of the matter is that John Brumby can afford to pay a bit more for electricity,” Mr Brumby said in an interview with The Sunday Age

Revealing himself once again the economic ignoramus that he is, he continued:

It would also focus on encouraging people to make their homes more energy efficient

Who else has said the same? Mlacolm Turnbull and Kevin Rudd. Effiency means more and not less or, what this lot of fascist cretins are about to do to Australians, delibateratly smash production of energy to smithereens by carbon taxation. Brendan Nelson has arrived at a momentous decision as leader of the Federal Opposition, he will do to Australians in 2012 what Rudd wants to realise by 2010.

On economic efficiency, here’s more corrective reading,

Economics, natural resources and Liberal Party stupidity

The humble light bulb: a victim of political stupidity and green zealotry

Plastic bags v. greenie bigotry

Rudd, Bracks, Brumby, Nelson, Turnbull, et al, have this in common, unlike millions of Australians, they do not expect to suffer a cut in their living standards that will see, at the minimum, their wives screaming at them for being rotten miserable bastards. Rudd declared recently that unlike the mere lumpenmasse, his loved ones will continue to enjoy a mutli-billionaire’s life-style. For some unfathomable reason the name Mao occurs so I’ll tap it in just in case.

Here comes that cunard again sown by the Centre of Independent Studies:

“For lower and middle income families, they will need protection, in varying degrees, from high electricity prices…”

Apart from the contradiction, deliberate sabotage by Executive aimed at cutting power generation, there is no compensation for the smashing of capital in energy production, and none for all companies for which economic supply is crucial. None at all.

A feature of Bracks and Brumby is that their inanities are complemented by infantile expressions:

The Government, he said, would make a huge effort to get Victorians to treat energy with the care with which they treated other important resources

Last week, exscusing his criminal refusal to allow a genuine free martket supplier to build massive dams on the Mitchell, and if required in the Otways, he said:

“Victorians will have to learn to share water…”

Brumby can lead by example and wash his hair in his neighbour’s sewerage water. Unable to help himself, he continued to reel off more lies:

Energy price rises were inevitable with or without an emissions trading scheme, Mr Brumby said, because of global market forces and the rising cost of oil.

It is politicians like him him who have cut oil supply and drove up prices, with a little help with the Feds:

Democrats v. Arctic abundance
(This is apart from all the other recent discoveries)

Oil production: Earth to Nancy Pelosi

Democrats playing (bad) politics with oil

Let Drilling Ring

Oil prices, monetary stability and credit expansion

Commodity prices and inflation — is there a connection?

The truth of the matter is politicians of both major parties, Federal and States’, catering for the Watermelon Red Greens and the diseased Left, are about to wilfully commit a horrendous crime against Australians. Brumby sees nothing wrong with this, but why should he, for he is one of the archtiects of Brackistan.

That Bracks sees nothing wrong in destroying millions of Australians does not make it lawful. Is there any good reason why what Federal and States’ Executives are mounting should not be treated as major criminal actions, matched by the unadulterated police state violence required to ram them down? There is none.

There is a connection, the Wootton funded coalition of treacherous Leftists under the umbrella, Climate Change Institute, which includes such thugs as Sharon Burrows, and reports directly to Rudd. As it is, after the 2007 Federal election, Rudd proclaimed super funds should be soaked to fund Federal Government squander. The ACTU is fully committed to Rudd’s and Wong’s scheme to economically raze Australians through carbon taxation and the fraud of ‘alternative energy’.

There are three parts to this item:

1. Is Kevin Rudd apprised of the activities disclosed in the root charge, the ACTU is siphoning super funds into ‘alternative energy companies?

2. “Heinergate”: Kevin Rudd, former Queensland Premier Wayne Goss’s, Chief of Staff. This shocking affair is the subject of O’Neill’s document cited in the article below. The shredding of the Heiner documents and the defrauding of the Queensland Public Super Funds are tied, as discussed in this section, “Heinergate”.

3. Media suppression of “Heinergate” and evidence damaging to the ALP. For increased illumination, the Left dominated Canberra press pack’s perversion of justice in the case of Lionel Murphy will be cited. They can be trusted to repeat the exercise.

The 5th morning and this is time enough for actions that would settle the matter, or bring it to a conclusion through investigations. Instead, the ACTU is frozen solid. And, so are ASIC, ATO, ACCC and the Federal Police, and it must be asked of them, why?

There is a difference between this and Heinergate. In this case, the siphoned funds, according to the report, have been funnelled into shell ‘companies’ and this means not all records can be shredded. The money trail might not be too difficult to pursue, observing if real companies and the fictional shell ‘alternative energy’ companies have received funds, there are serious implications involved:

If true, and if MacQuarie Bank is a destination of unlawfully funnelled funds, principals of the Bank and certainly its expert advisers in the Tax Act (in particular the 10 or so volumes covering superannuation), other Acts, and in Common Law, must realise the implications.

ASIC is failing in its duties with distinction. Noting that it has been enthusiastic in investigating sham companies under the Acts it enforces, ASIC refuses to investigate the frauds called ‘alternative energy companies’ and ‘super investment units’ in the same. Is political corruption involved, in view of the Kyoto –Green cult compliance psychopathic mania of their new masters, the Rudd Cabinet, and interests seeking to profit through larceny and their political connections – some of whom we have already uncovered and they are not all ALP connections? Thus, there are two issues:

1.The shell companies themselves.
2.The charge ACTU defrauding super funds Melbourne radio station publicised last Friday.

ASIC is duty bound under the Acts it enforces to investigate both grievous matters.

Is Kevin Rudd apprised of the activities charged against the ACTU?

“The Climate Institute” reports directly to Kevin Rudd. On its site, Sharon Burrows is quoted,

ACTU President Sharan Burrow said “Our groups share a platform that seeks to ensure climate policies are broadly based and everyone does their fair bit… we know the Rudd Government faces a legion of corporate lobbyists pushing for special deals.’

“We need… green jobs and climate friendly industries…”

Unlike the “special deals” being done with entities set up for what is nothing more than larceny called alternative energy firms. A check of the Board of “The Climate Institute” shows some have vested interests in activities receiving either direct government transfers and/or ‘profit’ from the Rudd Executive coercing Australians into shell ‘firms’. An exception is the Woottons, who sunk $10m to set up this front.

That is only one of Rudd’s ‘advisers’. The number of diseased Left fronts engaged in public propaganda and advising the Rudd Cabinet is as a google search shows large. Here’s another site, “Australian Policy Online”.

A common denominator is, they are pushing for large scale larceny, ‘transfers’ into ‘alternative energy’ scams and it is central to Rudd’s totalitarian plans. Wong and Rudd are engaged in a hard sell progom to deceive Australians on not only the lie Co2 taxes are “costless”, as the Centre of Independent Studies falsely declared. It is also about decieving Australians into accepting diversion of their funds into worthless shells. It is deceiving as many as possible into drinking arsenic and this means millions of Australians holding modest super plans.

If the charge is correct, given the range of ties between the Cabinet and the ACTU, then Rudd might well be apprised of the siphoning. He is a ‘micro-managing’ bureaucrat demonstrating absolutist aims. He has solidly aligned himself with the Stalinist diseased Left. He is briefed by his diseased Leftist pals.

“Heinergate”

This shocking scandal involves two types of criminal actions. Heinergate stemmed from an original report for police action on systematic crimes committed against youths in a ‘youth detention centre’. These crimes included:

…some boys and girls were being forced into sexual activity against their wishes, for the benefit of others; that illicit drugs and prescribed medications were being brought into the Centre, sometimes by staff and sometimes by detainees who had simply walked out and returned apparently without any permission; that some staff were physically and sexually abusing children in their care…

In a petition submitted to the Queensland Parliament, Kevin Lindeberg set out a detailed account of “Heinergate”, from the original crimes to defrauding of the Union Super fund to buy the silence of a witness, to Goss, Cabinet, and head staff shredding the evidence collected by Heiner:

Lindeberg Petition

In another statement to that Parliament, Lindeberg commenced,

“Fear undoubtedly permeatesQueensland’s public service, and fear of speaking out to avoid a reprisal puts accountability at risk. Queensland’s public servants do not trust their system of government. They know it is highly politicised and toxic. We believe that bullying and intimidation starts from the top.”

Premier Beattie continued to protect the culprits in Government Offices:

On Thursday, Premier Peter Beattie was presented with a letter signed by former Western Australian Chief Justice (David Malcolm), two retired NSW Chief Judges (Jack Lee, now deceased, and Dr Frank McGrath), two retired NSW Supreme Court Justices (Roddy Meagher and Barry O’Keefe), one of Australia’s foremost QCs (Alec Shand) and a legal academic and barrister (Alastair MacAdam) all seeking the appointment of an Independent Special Prosecutor into an unresolved outrageous injustice now known as the Heiner Affair, which has been poisonously suppurating since the days of the Goss government.

A copy of this letter was also received by Queensland’s Governor, Chief Justice, Opposition Leader, Bar Association and Law Society.

It followed the completion of a two-year audit by leading NSW QC, David Rofe, who prepared a 3000-word, nine volume report on the case and concluded there were 67 alleged unaddressed prima facie criminal charges that needed to be urgently addressed.

At the heart of the matter is the order by the Goss Cabinet of March 5, 1990, to destroy all documents relating to an inquiry by retired magistrate Noel Heiner into the management of the John Oxley Youth Detention Centre.

Heiner had been appointed by Premier Wayne Goss’s predecessor, Premier Russell Cooper, in late 1989 to investigate serious allegations of the abuse of children in the state youth detention centre, including the rape of a 14-year-old Aboriginal girl by male inmates in May, 1988, during a supervised bush outing, raised by several youth workers.

Outrageously, this rape is still unresolved.

Justice Gleeson said one of the features of the rule of law was that it applied to “the governors” as well as “the governed”.

“… all, the governors as well as the governed

“ the criminal law should operate uniformly in circumstances which are not materially different.”

Justice de Jersey…in a newspaper article, “judges comprise the courts which maintain the rule of law so fundamental to our free and democratic society”.

…former appeal Court Judge… went on to warn that those who authorised the shredding of the Heiner Affair documents could still be charged with criminal offences.

Mr. Pelly related in September of 2007:

David Rofe QC believes there should be a full investigation into events surrounding the 1989 inquiry by retired magistrate Noel Heiner into complaints by staff against the manager of the state-run John Oxley Youth Centre…

Mr Rofe examined the destruction of the documents in a 3600-page report and identified 67 possible breaches of the criminal code by Queensland cabinet ministers and public servants.

He said yesterday that the Opposition Leader[Kevin Rudd], who was chief of staff for then premier Wayne Goss, had been perceived as “the man we are after”.

“There are a lot of people who need to be asked and to answer questions.” He said those interested “would have had weeks of going through these documents”.

Senator Barnaby Joyce is an economic illiterate but on the disgusting perversion of the course of justice he is admirable:

Prima facie charges appear available for the prosecution of key members in this parliament and in Queensland. This is Rudd’s accountable government already showing its true colours.

I again draw attention to Rudd’s abuse Mr.O’Neill detailed in his evidence, quoted in the article below, ACTU is frozen over the aired allegations (22/7/08). He called O’Neill “this disgruntled c***”. O’Neill’s crime? To merely seek justice on all criminal matters he related.

A telling chronology

1988 - Rudd appointed Chief of Staff to the Labor Opposition Leader in Queensland, Wayne Goss.

1999, Goss wins election, appointed Kevin Rudd Chief of Staff to the Premier.

1992 Goss appointed Rudd Director-General of the Office of the Cabinet.
1994, Rudd preselected for Federal seat, so resigns the last position.

The dates! They cover the period documented for Goss, his Cabinet and top staffers engaged in the cover up and the shredding of documents. Kevin, the “micro-managing” control freak was at the centre of Goss’ Office, and Cabinet.

Media suppression of “Heinergate”

The media made every effort to suppress the scandal, right through to Rudd’s election in 2007 and that was why. Leading the charge to aid those perverting the course of justice was that treacherous Left dominated rag Murdoch’s The Australian. Needless to say the Beazely, then Latham, then Rudd-Wong-Peter Garrett propaganda machine called the ABC buried it completely. They deliberatley engaged in the cover-up, and it is worth quoting the lie told by Goss’ successor:

Mr Beattie on 4bc declared that anyone caught destroying evidence could expect to be charged.

No-one has been. Further, Beattie’s own attempt to bury the crimes committed makes for a good read too. The above quotes and Beattie’s actions are included in a comprehensive archive, named below with link. From the front page of the site:

ABC’s Andrew Carroll was sacked from the Morning Show after interviewing Kevin Lindeberg, who exposed the crimes committed by the Queensland Executive.

University of Queensland sacked Prof(Journalism) Bruce Grundy at the end of 2007, when he took “Lindeberg’s cause through “The Independent” newspaper”.

Murdoch’s staff on his The Courier-Mail suppressed all facts.

Chris Mitchell, editor of The Australian, smeared those who were fighting for justice, and falsified the facts and their importance with “willing accomplice, The Australian reporter Greg Roberts”. Here’s an example of their lying, and deception of the public. One target of their venom was Scott Balson, who took up the cause:

by Scott Balson - February 2008

The Australian, waits until the target of its vindictive editor-in-chief, Chris Mitchell leaves the country before…

It is important to correct one of Balson’s reflections -

Chris Mitchell has ‘wrecked the reputation of The Australian.

Not singlehandedly. Mr. Gerard Jackson, editor of Brookesnews has an archive of articles in this news magazine documenting the lying, diseased Leftists who run riot at the rag. Mitchell’s actions are typical of the rag and for many years now. What is amusing is the family connections between Kevin Rudd and journalists on The Australian.

The Lionel Murphy Case

Wendy Bacon, a former journalist with Fairfax and now a professor of journalism, admitted in The Australian (24 January 1999) that Jim McClelland confessed to her and others that the late Lionel Murphy, Labor Party hero and High Court Judge, had been corrupt.

Not only that, McClelland, a prominent member of the Labor Party, also confessed to perjuring himself at Murphy’s trial thus securing Murphy’s acquittal. Now let us try to comprehend the full import of what happened.

Bacon justified concealing the admission of perjury by claiming confidentiality. What needs to be noted is that any reasonable view of “journalistic privilege”, a concept with no legal standing, cannot include a criminal act, especially a serious one…

These left-wing journalists could either choose to uphold the rule of law and so protect the integrity of the High Court or aid and abet Murphy and McClelland in their corrupt activities. They chose the latter, as did the Labor Party itself. These actions…

This is exactly what we have in the case of Goss, his Cabinet, some union officials and Kevin Rudd, and the media served them and why? To protect Rudd and the Federal ALP, in order to win power over all Office? Rudd and those politicians involved in these matters, even by co-operating in the perversion of justice by suppressing them are clearly not fit to hold a seat in Parliament.

All the above puts Rudd’s position as Prime Minister into more than mere hypothetical question.

More material worth attending to:

Breaking news: Australian Press Council uphold Scott Balson’s complaint… 8th February 2008…

The dishonest “article” by The Australian (News Ltd) to try and destroy the reputation of the whistleblower, Kevin Lindeberg, by associating him with myself (the “racists” messenger) because the impact that this page was having on Kevin Rudd’s hopes of becoming Prime Minister is one of the most crystalised and clear cut examples of the real power lurking behind Australian politics…

Ian Callinan QC appointed to High Court

It was…totally right that no one questioned his formidable legal ability or integrity.

…forgotten by the mainstream media…was his unexpected and stunning representation in 1995 of Queenslander Mr Kevin Lindeberg before the Senate Select Committee…when it attempted to investigate the… shredding of the Heiner Inquiry documents by order of the Goss Government.

[As] was his oral submission and written opinion regarding the legality of the shredding. He…suggest[ed] that it was open to conclude that the entire Goss Cabinet had committed serious offences… to prevent their use in litigation after the Crown had been served with notice of impending court proceedings in which those records were known to be critically relevant.

He suggested in 1995 that the case warranted serious re-examination and severely criticised the Criminal Justice Commission’s handling of the Lindeberg allegations.

in October 1996 two more independent respected counsel… found that the allegations had real substance.

Messrs Morris QC and Howard…in 1995, managed to examine hard evidence held by the Queensland Government but hidden for years under the Goss regime… [they] wanted to examine the relevant Cabinet material relating to the decision to shred but the current leader of the Opposition Mr Peter Beattie MLA refused them access…

“The Senate is destroying the rights of Australians,”

The report by the “whistle blower”.

“I was at the time of the shredding, and am, a member of the Australian Labor Party.

“I also became a victim of the shredding, and would not cop it.
“That struggle now places me before the Australian Senate for

What we have are polticians and some to bureaucrats who presided over crimes committed against teenagers, albeit convicted of crimes and in dentention. They covered this up, they shredded the Heiner evidence, and the reason?

They faced actions. To evade justice, they committed actions open to criminal charges and convictions. Kevin Rudd would not have escaped the investigations and subsequent trials. Neither would other ALP figures.

If the charge against the ACTU, aired last week is true, it can be expected the treacherous Left dominated media will seek to suppress facts, aid suppressing investigation, and will make every effort to stop the public being informed of the facts. They would also distort beyond recognition any material that escapes into the public arena, as items linked above demonstrate.

Conclusion

What we have are ruthless thugs. They are now in power and they demonstrate that under Rudd they are bent on a totalitarian course. In the meantime, will ASIC, ACCC, ATO and the Federal Police do their duty against the ACTU, even if that involves investigating Rudd, and fearlessly raise any charges that emerge? Or, will they cave in - a variation on “Heinergate” as it were.

Since the radio stations broadcasted it the charge is still open. It is now the 5th day. The grave possibility is, the ACTU is defrauding some Australians of their savings, with the co-operation, of course, of pseudo-investment destinations for unlawfully removed funds.

Destinations that are in themselves nothing but fraudulent shells for the commission of larceny, is alone serious cause for investigation - at least by ASIC. ASIC must conduct thorough investigations of the shell ‘firms’. It is duty bound to enforce the very Acts it administers because of what those scams are, and what they seek to obtain, investor’s funds.

One thing is clear, a solid picture. Taken with the above, and his fascist aims, Rudd is a thoroughly nasty piece of work. I’ll repeat it:

Kevin Rudd is not a Christian, he is not a Catholic, he is anti Christian, ant-Catholic and only a mere jackbooted, nasty little fascist slob of a thug.

Do these bastards really believe they can continue to wipe out the real rights of Australians, Common Law, economic freedom, drag good people through the mud, and even as in Victoria via the STO and OPA seize all their propety, impose their vile absolutist Greens cult without decent Australians turning around and taking action against them? Oh, they do, but as also their intimate, congenital idiot cousins who have stuffed the Liberal Party, they presume too much.

Bye the bye, Balson documents congenital idiots infesting the carcass of the Liberal Party co-operated with Federal and State ALP MPs in suppressing “Heinergate” - this revelation, while disgusting, is no surprise - look what the bastards (with their advisers - including IPA and CIS) did with the Victorian STO and OPA, and thus to many victims of their brutality and larceny.

Readers can now fully appreciate why numbers of Federal MPs infesting the Liberal Party and the ALP have been campaigning for some time now to have blog sites censored. It is all about the news they wish be concealed, and the lying Leftist media obliges (which shows how stupid the “Right” is). Oh yes it is:

Parasites wrecking the Liberal Party and diseased Leftists have spelt it out in Federal Parliament. It’s on the record called Hansard.

Scott Balson extensive archives on “Shreddergate”

Mr. Peter Yates is a director of the Centre for Independent Studies, and a director of the Chinese based Peony Company. He is also the brother of Mr. Oliver Yates. Mr. Oliver Yates is “global head of climate change products, Macquarie Bank”. Another figure who has a conflict of interest is Alan Stockdale, head of MacQuarie Bank’s “Infrastructure Group” (MIG), and is the current Federal President of the Liberal Party.

Are the schemes run by Macquarie bank one of the destinations of super funds controlled by the ACTU? This is the 4th morning since the strong rumour ACTU is defrauding ACTU controlled super funds members was broadcast on Melbourne radio, and the ACTU is frozen silent.

Oliver Yates and MacQuarie Bank

Green machine

OLIVER Yates is not widely known outside Macquarie Group and certainly not as well known as brother Peter, but that is all about to change as the group goes full speed ahead into making money from the green movement

Macquarie Bank:

Renewable energy

Macquarie is an active investor in the renewable energy industry. We are dedicated to sourcing investments across renewable technologies including wind, solar, landfill gas, hydro, biomass, biogas and geothermal. Macquarie also has carbon funding operations.

The scope of our renewable energy activities include:

direct investment, joint ventures and partnerships in renewable energy projects structuring development funding for greenfield projects project finance, corporate advisory and mergers and acquisitions climate change financial products environmental markets and emissions trading environmental policy development.

Europe, North America and the Asia Pacific.

In Asia Pacific, they have sunk investor’s funds into windmills.

‘Alternative energy’ schemes are not market - customer-serving formations. Macquarie Bank’s main major activity is in countries in which - surprise, surprise, Governments are engaged in large-scale larceny to set up and prop up ‘alternative energy schemes’. Namely, Britain, Europe, Canada and the United States.

They are not investments. If they were, entrepreneurs and investors would have volitionally established real, profit earning companies, and that means real productive capital. Investors in markets have said the future in ‘alternative energy’ does not exist. They are get quick rich schemes for principals behind the scams, politicians and bureaucrats, and destroyers of investor’s capital.

Peter Yates

Peter Yates is also up to his eyeballs in what are nothing but shells for larceny and set up only by government coercion reflected in how many tens of billions of taxpayers’ stolen private property has been sunk into them:

Bill Gates was a great entrepeneur, but outside of Microsoft, he is either a simpleton or has toed the Stalinist Greens-U.S. Democrats line in order to protect Microsoft. After all, the Stalinist Democrats had already punished Microsoft by forcing a split in the company and its production under the anti-freemarket Sherman Act. Gates’ mistake was not to funnel a few hundred millions into the Democrat Party coffers. There is a word for it, extortion and, man, did they appy the thumb screws to Microsoft via Gates.

Needless to say, Gates found entry into their good books by blowing away enough to fund a couple of good sized real businesses on Stalinist causes. Thus, for example, instead of funding real start up enterprises, he committed $U.S.100m to set up the racket called the Peony Capital Ltd. Peter Yates got into the act as a Director of Peony, and the Stalinists’ good books too:

<blockquote>…waste heat recovery, wind farm power generation, energy efficiency, coal mine methane, landfill management and small scale hydropower. Carbon emissions saved are deemed to have created a carbon credit, which Peony on-sells to buyers in industrialised countries in the form of tradable Certified Emission Reduction certificates.

Alan Stockdale

Stockdale has recently resigned as Chairman of the Institute of Public Affairs. It doesn’t really resolve conflict of interest and governance “issues”, considering Stockdale is head of MIG and is the Federal President of the Liberal Party. Resigning as Chairman of the IPA is tokenism, a formal distancing from the watermelon red Kemp family and their cashbox, is trivial against the MacQuarie Bank’s activism in pushing for capital destroying Kyoto compliance and pushing junk shell schemes to get rich by blowing up others’ real capital to smithereens.

MacQuarie Bank’s MIG is tied into government squander, falsely called investment. The principle involved in ‘infrastructure’ is, while each tier of government sacks taxpayers for roads, water and so forth. They are put on a pseudo-business basis on which taxpayers’ are taxed all over again in the way of pseudo-market price charging. This is what the CIS, and the IPA mean by privatisation and ‘market comptetition’. Premier of Brackistan John Brumby used the excuse, “so Victorians can appreciate everything has a cost”, yah and don’t they know what thugs the State “Guvmnt.” and Local extortionists Councils are.

Greg Lindsay, of his superannuation policy called the Centre of Independent Studies

He has a lot of explaining to do. The CIS’s advocacy of carbon taxation is intellectual fraud multiplied by its genre, propaganda, and its usage - by the Rudd Fascist Cabinet to justify what are totalitarian measures of mass destruction.

Perhaps his No.1 hitman, Professor Saunders, and his No.2 Professor Sinclair Davidson can do what his mere guns, Jason Soon and John “the Ralph Nader of Australia” Humphreys cannot, explaion the inexcusable. Oh, I forget, Davidson did attempt a defence, the one such types resort to, the good Professor sdmeared Mr. Jackson instead of meeting solid economic reasoning with economic rebuttal. Davidson could not because, while he can’t explain why, he does comprehend that there is no defence of the Stalinist measures he so eloquently supports.

Professor Sinclair Davidson a Professor? B.S.

It is being asked in certain quaters, is Lindsay’s John Humphreys “the Ralph Nader of Australia”.

Lindsay, what is your definition of talent?

Other Parties, the Wootton Family

Are the Woottons bound up with the above? Having funded hard, diseased Leftists and their plans to treat Australians to a re-run of that gulag called the USSR, consider this:

1930’s the Mosley’s used their fortune in an attempt to raise the Swastika over the British, with Charles Mosley the putative Fuhrer.

The Wootton’s are on the hard Left side of the nasty spectrum of socialist thugs, the communists. Have the Wootton’s taken a leaf out of Mosley’s biogrpahy and designed their own uniform -

Red plastic jackboots, red pantaloons, red blouse with green stripe down diagonal and natty little gold hammer and sickle badges? The Green stripe is to show their unity with the Pol Potian school of Stalinism, the Greens.

I wonder if the Kulaks of Hamilton are sharpening their pitchforks.

Any reader who has not appreciated why the Liberal Party is strangled, the above, to presume, clarifies the disease that is killing the Liberal Party.

More claims asserted by the IPCC as scientific truths have been recently shredded. The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley has exposed other major arguments used by the IPCC are false…

Income ‘transfers’ (redistribution) and (or) tax cuts) will not compensate for the truth of what carbon taxation will do, demolish capital, and that means no incomes for millions of Australian. Secondly, there are those who assert the impact would be eliminated or rendered minimal if other governments would do what Rudd and Wong are preparing. This is also a falsehood. The impact is on capital, and economic mass destruction will also occur in any other country under politicians bent on the insanity of cutting Co2 emissions and slamming down direct and indirect carbon taxes.

Those peddling the second lie are not only in, for example, the ACTU. They are also business associations and advisory groups, who are busily telling businessmen swallowing tanks of arsenic is good for them. The BCA and AIG are the equals of the CIS and IPA, a sheer waste of space, time, and members’ and donors’ money.

Kevin Rudd and Penny Wong, with Treasurer Wayne Swan, are scratching the bottom of the propaganda barrel in claiming this morning, ‘it would be economically irresponsible not to take action’. Increasing numbers aren’t swallowing their poison. They are realising being wiped out by Co2 taxation means no future at all. Consequently, Rudd, Wong, and their Kyoto goon squad, led by Garnaut, are running around Australia and smearing anyone who dares stand up to their pack of lies.

If Rudd wishes to live the cave-man life that is his business, but not when he is about to use undiluted police state coercion to reduce millions of Australians to stone-age misery. Let no-one be deluded nor hold any illusion as to what the impact will be. Many Australians will be wiped out quickly, and millions more will follow them. Besides, climate change is nothing more than an excuse to impose the agenda of the diseased hard Left.

Whether Pope Benedict considers Rudd a good Catholic is his private business. What Rudd is preparing is not the Pope’s private business. It is anti-Christian. It is anti-Catholic. It is criminal and savage. From the Apostles down through the great fathers, bishops, and theologians of the Church, to a man they would condemn Rudd because of his very strange notions and ‘plans’.

Needless to say, the ACTU is backing Rudd and Wong all the way. If they wish to defraud Union members of their super savings, given the reports on this, that is their business - though this involves a very large number offences from serious criminal offences to lesser offences. If union members are content to have their savings wiped out on ‘alternative energy’ schemes which are nothing more than the commission of larceny, that is their business. If those members are content or stupid to endure such abuse for the sake of the Greens’ and their Great Lie, they have no cause to whine. What is not their business is to demand every other Australian be compelled to submit to the same suicidal, larcenous, destruction of their own savings by nothing more than Federal totalitarian measures.

There is no point in evading the truth of the matter: Co2 causes climate change is an excuse to impose what is nothing less than totalitarian measures. This is why many politicians in the West latched onto it, and not becuase they believe it.

There is no science behind it. The claims about Co2, and how it behaves in the atmosphere, to support the grand lie, are lies. Turning to other damning indictments, McIntyre and McKitrick demolished the fiction the IPCC latched onto in order to stir up the hysteria required to galvanise many in the West into accepting another round of rotten, stinking, absolutism. The solid shredding of the ‘Hockey Stick’ saw the IPCC running for cover.

More claims asserted by the IPCC as scientific truths have been recently shredded. The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley, in a rigorous paper, has exposed that other major arguments used by the IPCC are false, and the method by which they generated them false. He laid it out in an open letter to the American Physical Society,

Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered

The editor of the APS attached vicious comment against the paper.

Monckton’s finding also add to what has been established about the IPCC’s methods a veneer of science of science only. This is besides the outright infantile rubbish otherwise pumped by the boosters. It is time to call what the boosters are guilty of for what it is - the deliberate perpetration of fraud. With it, the perversion, corruption, destruction, overthrow of good science. All this so that a pack of ugly nobodies such as Wong and Rudd can get away with setting themselves up as the fascist, absolutist, little plastic jack-booted slobs they are.

The Monday following the publicity sourounding the latest petition signed by 32,000 scientists, Penny Wong attacked the 32,000 as ‘deniers’. Oh, absolutely, it’s a crime to oppose belief in magic. Penny Wong and Kevin Rudd have no corner to run to, they are lying on science and economics. They are supporting in intellectual fraud as a smokescreen for their real aims. That is their morality.

The good news is the growing reaction. Australians in exponentially increasing numbers are realising what it is Rudd and Wong are preparing to do to them. They are also beginning to perceive the excuse - the Green’s great lie, is just that. Rudd and Wong are not blind to this, which is why they are in a panic, and why they are now committed to spending millions of dollars on a propaganda campaign in order to arrest the growing reaction against them.

This is in addition to the media having intensified their own propaganda efforts.

What is the Liberal Party doing?

Drowning because of the cowardice, stupidity and mendacity of those who have wrecked the Liberal Party, and continue strangling it to death. We shall muse on this tomorrow.

No! Golly gosh, is it true? It is entirely credible, given ACTU thugs are behind the plans of Rudd and Wong to raze Australians into the Stone Age.

A strong rumour is doing the rounds in Melbourne that at least one Union is siphoning super funds it runs into ‘alternative energy’ frauds. Their justification is Rudd will transfer billions into ‘alternative energy companies’ and this will constitute the earnings return to funds. Not that, if true, it is at all surprising. The ACTU has supported magic instead of science for a long time, and bunk instead of economics. The grey matter jogged -

Windpower, union stupidity and green lies

Recently, a minor union official complained about the impact of the financial markets’ gyrations. I appreciate not all union officials are thugs. Some are well intentioned and decent, though misguided - as in supporting measures that sees many given a 100% pay cut in the form of unemployment, by forcing effective minimum pay rates above market rates. The subject complained the market staggers is slicing the nominal value off his savings.

Assuming politicians were not bent on economic destruction via Co2 taxes and other tax and kill capital measures, over time the share market builds savings into a nest egg worth retiring on. Savers don’t have to be high income earners to achieve this at all. The current value of that official’s super holdings, therefore, is trivial, unless he wishes good stocks cashed in and to take a real loss.

He further complained, it is wrong retirement funds should be built out of investment in capital. He opined, ‘why can’t we go back to the old tried and true way of prescribed pensions’. This was when the official totally lost me. He clearly does not realise that there cannot be a ‘prescribed pension’ without capital and, crucially, capital accumulation.

Due to the ruthless immorality of anti-market labour pricing measures, worries over nest eggs is solved for the compulsorily made destitute. Their immediate worry is to obtain paying work, and then they can worry over accumulating a nest egg and its future value.

The lucky few with paying jobs, who are members of Unions, and have their savings policies with their unions, won’t have to worry about their nest eggs either. As reported, the Union heavies are wiping them out by throwing it down the black hole of ‘alternative energy’ frauds.

It does beg the question of lawfulness of these actions against fund members. Have the ACTU heavies told members they are plundering their modest savings to enrich their pals in Government and in extortion rackets called ‘alternative energy companies’?

Consider a new start up, genuine free market proposition. Super funds do not and cannot direct funds held in trust into supplying start up capital in ventures that may or may not succeed. Policy holders must approve such allocations and that means, being in funds that enable them to approve it, on evaluation of the risks should they, it is usually an insignificant consideration which won’t damage fund performance). Otherwise, individuals pushing some little amount, and those who engage in large venture capital raising and allocation do the work.

‘Alternative Energy companies’ are not free market capital formations. We can tell; they are subsidised to the hilt. They were set up only because Governments transferred tremendous sums to their ‘principals’. Funds stolen from real taxpayers and their genuine capital investments. They have no market value.

If what they were doing was valuable, investors would volitionally supply them capital. None have and, miracle of miracles - denied by the likes of Union thugs, Mark Vaile, Jeff Kennett, David Kemp, Penny Wong and Kevin Rudd, they plan long term and act rationally. They have seen the future in ‘alternative energy’; it does not exist. Therefore, they concluded, it is suicidal to extend capital to it, unless there is a genuine loony out there who reckons wiping out their own little all is a brilliant way to build a nest egg.

What many investors will not do, because they are neither suicidal nor loonies, the bosses of at least one union will do. Those bosses believe they can defy economics, the markets and, in the case of ‘alternative energy’, science.

‘Science…’ this must be qualified. Some things, windmills, solar panels, and ethanol are of course sound in science and engineering as such. However, they are not sound in science for the function, energy generation.

Solar panels and windmills, for example, cannot generate sufficient energy to power a room in a tiny house, and this is before economically efficient production. There is no scientific and thus engineering basis on which to achieve economically efficient production. By definition, therefore, to allocate capital into those schemes is to destroy it. Here’s a case study:

1. In America in 1991, LUZ, a solar-electricity generating company, went into bankruptcy. LUZ is interesting because it had been asserted by zealous solar power supporters (especially in the media) that the company’s technology had made solar power an economic alternative to nuclear. Even Fortune magazine waded in with support. LUZ had built its plant in the New Mexico desert to take advantage of the highly favourable conditions. But even there they could not make their 354 MW operation pay, which brings us right back to Suzy Freeman-Greene.

What is also crucial about the LUZ collapse is, ‘alternative energy schemes’ (they are schemes not free market, capital investments) are heavily subsidised. To follow the ACTU bosses, the collapse should not have occurred because LUZ was a major beneficiary of large subsidies. The ACTU are not only economic illiterates, they are also financial ignoramuses.

Financials is about capital. Financial profit is capital accumulation. So, why did Luz collapse?

The price of capital, of shares in a firm, is the sum of the present value of expected future earnings. The allocation of capital into a firm that produces nothing valued has no future earnings. It can only finish in bankruptcy. Here we are talking about earnings before whether a firm is justified. There are enough who sink their savings into loss makers, but no one volitionally sinks their savings into something for which earnings are not possible or are so trivial as to be as good as zero. Subsidies are not real earnings.

Profit: there is no single rate for all companies to justify their capital allocations. One company might require a gross of 12% another 30%. Why 30% but to leap the hurdles of taxes including regulations in order to yield its owners a return justifying their backing, the net return. Governments wipe out advantages in various investments because of the savage burdens they impose. The destruction of the former multi-billion petro-chemical production companies in Australia typifies that force.

A firm in profit means capital accumulation, which is applied to maintaining capital in existing production, expansion, and for new investments. Loss making signals capital extinction is occurring and the question is, can it be remedied or must it be shut down to stop further liquidation of capital. Subsidies over-ride these very important signals for action. They create the chimera of success when capital locked up in failing firms is being consumed. It gives the appearance capital is being maintained when it is being consumed.

Subsidies to alternative energy companies is not papering over loss making. It is deliberate fraud concealing funds sunk into them is instant capital destruction. There is nothing there. They are shells for the commission of larceny - private property seized to only make the politicians, a few bureaucrats, and con men pretending to be businessmen wealthy.

If the rumour is true, and it is a very strong rumour that has now been broadcast over the airwaves, then the ACTU are defrauding their members! Subsidisation is the mechanism to be used to conceal from fund members the ACTU is wiping out their modest savings. They are doing this in anticipation of Rudd transferring tremendous sums into the hollow schemes called alternative energy.

It follows, and it is a very strong rumour, do not grounds for criminal investigation exist – in common law and, interestingly, under all the Acts the Federal government has put through covering such actions? Will the ATO also investigate the ACTU? The ATO launches investigations on reasons feebler than a strong rumour against others who, for example, are merely trying to preserve their own private property against confiscation by Government and, the ATO has them thrown into jail for it.

After all, if a non-Union fund were to do what the strong rumour lifts out as above, just now broadcasted by 3AW, its officers would not only have broken trust. They would be convicted of a long list of criminal and lesser charges, thrown into prison and their own assets would be seized - to compensate their victims.

To reinforce the above, follow up points and reading matter:

The duplicity of Citipower solar panel experiment:

Citipower’s panels generated a maximum… miserable 83 watts… a wretched 8 per cent efficiency (for the total price to make and install it) of $A25, 000…

If the family “saved” a hypothetical $A100 a quarter in electricity bills that would have worked out at $A400 p.a.. This means that it would take this ‘investment’ 62 years and 6 months to break even. But when we discount the return (as we must because a present dollar is worth more than a future dollar) by, say, 10 per cent this ‘investment’ will never pay for itself. It wouldn’t even repay the family’s $A5000 investment. Then of course we have depreciation. If this is set at 10 per cent, for example, then the installation last for 10 years. Even if you run it till it falls to pieces, it still cannot pay for itself at these prices. This is what is called a lousy investment. It’s also lousy science and lousy PR.

Government MPs plan to rip millions off in subsidies for ethanol producers [Which they promptly did]

How the Bracks’ Government will cut Victorians’ living standards [And Victorians are yet to discover how deep the bottom of the pit is]

Erwin Jackson of the Australian Conservation Foundation, [Stalinist Green’s front and is subsidised to boot - Watermelon Red former Ministers pretending to be genuine Liberals also happily threw very large sums at those treacherous, Islamo-fascist - Hugo Chavez supporting, diseased bastards] railed:

… unless an Australian government throws buckets of dollars at that green fantasy called solar energy we will all be “rooned” (The Age, It’s clean and it’s green, but Howard isn’t interested in it, 26 September 2006).

And what does our intrepid investigative reporter throw up as evidence? The fact that other governments subsidise solar energy. And that’s the key — subsidies. If solar energy was superior to centralised electricity generation subsidies would not be necessary.

Green economic illiteracy, money-grubbing CEOs and windmills

Advocates of capital destruction and fraud and larceny to prop up ‘alternative energy - because they reckon razing Australians to the Stone Age is the way forward - reside in/associated with the Centre of Independent Studies. This lot pretends to be genuine free market economists. Genuine Liberals cringe, diseased leftists split their sides laughing (as they do over the IPA and the HR Nicholls Society - David Kemp boasted The HR Nich. Soc. is feared by the Left in Parliament - I cracked up laughing when I read that speech to his fellow HR Nich. Clubmen)

Jason Soon is one of them and, darn, is that guy shallow and callow and callous. Such types have to be callous, because no one decent contemplates wiping out millions of Australians using a pack of lies to justify totalitarian, criminal action on a massive scale. And so,

“To suggest, as Jason did, that we should implement a carbon tax because this will somehow force science to eventually find a better solution is not only naïve it is utterly reckless. Jason’s logic leads us to conclude that to find a decent substitute for petrol the government need only raise the excise to a prohibitive level.”

The boy is as hot as his stable- (play) mate John Humphreys, and these are only two of Greg Lindsay’s gunmen:

No one rumbles with his No.1. hitman, Professor Saunders, because they can’t stop giggling to bother with him. Truly, I’ve tested this by mentioning his name around the city, to heavyweights, and they all burst out laughing.

Dr. Jack Wheeler, To The Point News, set out:

Ethanol has only 2/3 the energy of regular gas, so you get 1/3 less energy per gallon, which means it adds 33 percent to the gas-per-mile cost of driving. But there’s also the cost of ethanol transport, which is by truckload or railroad, much higher than by oil pipeline (which ethanol can’t use because it can’t handle any water seepage like oil can).

The argument that ethanol reduces emissions is a fraud. With a modern car engine’s oxygen sensors and computer-controlled fuel injection, there’s no difference in CO (carbon monoxide) coming out your tailpipe with regular gas or ethanol.

Hell hath no fury than folks threatened with the elimination of their government subsidy. The question to ask the corn farmers is: if ethanol is so great, how come you don’t run your tractors with it and use (far more economical) diesel instead?

One qualification is in order: ethanol emissions pump carcinogens into the air.

Next to being a fraud, ethanol production, which Andrew Bolt advocates as the way to go, is destroying the lattice of food production worldwide with horrendous famines now a real danger. Tim Blair refuses to attack his guru, Bolt, over this fraud, and his other pals in the CIS and IPA and HR. Nich. Soc.

Greens are the enemies of liberty

Economic growth is under attack by greens

Shockingly, they are winning what is a ‘war’. This is due to the unprincipled illiterates who have wrecked the Liberal Party. This lot, when in States’ and Federal Parliaments imposed many measures the Stalinist Greens and their hard Left allies in the ALP demand. This ‘achievement’ was ably assisted by the cretins in the CIS, the IPA and the HR. Nich. Soc. They served the treacherous Left and not Australians - and they are too stupid to realise this is exactly what they did and continue to do - ditto Blair and Bolt.

A tale of two little porky tellers promoted 30,000 leagues above their Peter Principle level.

That ‘mainstream’ political parties latched onto the Greens’ lie, Co2 emissions causes global warming had nothing to do with politicians crediting it. It was simply convenient or, to put it another way quoting Cary Grant’s Roger Thornhill in Hitchcock’s North by North West, “In the world of advertising, there’s no such thing as a lie. There’s only expedient exaggeration.”

It shows, because until the politicians whipped up global warming hysteria, the expedient seized on was what came first, ‘national forests’ and ‘environmentalism’. The first excuse was a land grab, a transfer of wealth into the pockets of a lucky few, as reflected in the scandal of Portsea, with Toorak Brahman cheering Steve Bracks for this act of larceny.

In the name of environmentalism, real property rights have been overthrown. Taking the two together, Bracks, others in his Cabinet, and the not genuine Liberal “Right” enriched themselves again by imposition of development controls. A handful of cretins, enriching themselves on the one hand while on the other hand shredding the inalienable rights of many Australians.

The British Executive, having deliberately refused to do it its duty to uphold the law and by eradicating dangerous criminals. This is not peculiar to them, as the daily murders, bashings, rapes and stabbings in the streets of Melbourne attests. It has used the resulting violence as an excuse to ram down its Criminal Justice Act 2003 to complete what they have managed so well, the overthrow of common law for the capricious, prescriptive decrees of dictators. In Brackistan, the unleashing of dangerous criminals stems from the Bracks-Brumby Cabinets’ neo-Marxism, reinforced by judiciary and police chiefs appointed because they said the right things.

The U.K. Act has nothing to do with taking out dangerous criminals at all, as the exponentially increasing of savage crimes reflects. It was aimed at eliminating the ever diminishing real freedoms and rights of the British. I have used the U.K. Act to further illuminate what the situation is in Victoria.

With the US supreme court decision in hand, the majority decision composed of Justices loyal only to the US Stalinist Democrats Party, we now turn to Kevin Rudd and Penny Wong and what they are about to do. They are twinned in lying to Australians.

Pushing the lie Co2 emissions or, primitive belief decreed

The politicians who boost the lie, including too many in the name of the Liberal Party, no longer smear those who attack it as ’sceptics’. The penny seems to have dropped, it is tactically bad. Scepticism is fundamental to science and much else in daily life. They now use as their favourite expletive, ‘denier’.

There is nothing objectionable to being called a ‘denier’ either. I deny the deep ‘watermelon red Greens” lie for sound reasons, science, science and science. To deny something, or someone is often a very sound thing to do. The boosters’ usage is more insidious, it is a matter of right belief only. The only test is whether a claim is ideologically correct and not the truth content/its absence.

The politicians use it freely in Parliament as well as outside to excoriate anyone who denies the lie that Co2 causes global warming. For comparison, there is Islam, or communist regimes.

The difference between primitive man and civilised man is the former lives in a closed world, with no circuit breakers. All that occurs is interpreted - not understood and explained, from a set of beliefs, which may or may not make the believer feel good, but leaves him none the wiser. By the way, they mostly don’t leave believers even feeling better. Fear of mystical forces and projection of mystical forces is terror.

Belief in Co2 causes climate change is belief in mystical forces and projection of mystical forces, and this means terror. Governments have been brainwashing children into the Greens’ lie for some years now.

It is increasingly reported in the media that large and increasing numbers of children are intellectually and emotionally crippled by this savage act of child abuse committed by politicians and ideologically correct apparatchiks in Departments of Education and ‘teacher training institutes’. Thoroughly saturated in the propaganda, they believe the catastophes the liars assert will befall them.

The lie is a belief in magic.The causality, for example, central to the lie is not merely a travesty of science, it is the eradication of science. It is nothing less than, determinism + man manipulates the physics of the universe by special forces [universe is a puppet on a carbon string] through a singular mechanism, carbon emissions.

One will refrain from further criticism from science in this item, the above suffices to show how appallingly crude the Greens’ lie is. It is understandable why the boosters body of ’scientific evidence’ is ‘computer modelling’. This is not simply a highly expensive exercise in writing valid programmes only. It is oracular consultation. Or, updated, the technique is nothing more than as used by charlatans called psychics.

To rub it in, if it were at all possible for even weather to be mirrorred in a computer, the physics of the universe would have to be reduplicated and, even more staggeringly set to present infinite events and then what about the future! The sheer fatuous stupidity of the exercise and ‘boffins’ and ministers running around crying, ‘I have seen the evidence, I have it in my hand’ (as Ian Campbell once did as a Minister for the Environment) is too ludicrous for words. I would smack a child for being that infantile.

Oh, it is essential to repeat, Co2 is not a ‘poison’. Carbon is crucial for all plants, animals and man to exist. Co2 does not form, as the lie asserts, a blanket and that it endures for a cenutry or more and it is added to with further emissions.

A Trace element in the atmosphere, Co2 is so tiny as a % of gases that it is convenient for intelligible discussion to treat it as good as zero - no need to mention it. Co2 is dissolved in water vapour, washed to sea and land, to form tissue, and a myriad of other things such as dolomites. Though a minisicule trace, the greatest emitters of Co2 is not man, it is plants during the night. Co2 is reticulated. Hmmm, to satify the death cult, we should eradicate every tree and plant.

What is left of the core lie? Nothing, just a primitive belief fit only for savages. This is why, MPs howl and rant against ‘deniers’. They are ordering all Australians to suspend reason and believe a big fat lie, voodoo is real.

Will it be a criminal offence to refuse to believe, and to worship at the death cult?

Things are not that bad yet, but not far short of it either. Take the tens of thousands of brainwashed school children. It is not simply that they are thus corrupted. They are being converted into little finger wagging tyrants hectoring their parents and their betters for the hideous crime of emitting Co2. Combine both perversions and ponder the implications: Readers, which regimes turned children thus?

Correct, Stalinist and Nazi regimes.

The importance of the decision of the 5 ‘justices’ loyal to the US Stalinist Democrats is, as related yesterday, they found it law - the Greens’ lie is true and must be obediently believed, that is the force of their statement - Right Thinks.

Can it be a criminal offence to deny the lie, and attack it? The day is not far off. Kevin Rudd is also committed to suborning Australians to that taxpayer kept holiday house for lying, leftist thugs, the UN. So, what did Vincent Goia uncover but this:

Global warming deniers may risk criminal prosecution

We shall continue this tomorrow. For today, it is enough and damning. It is clear enough what is foreshadowed. Tomorrow, we resume with an all out evisceration of what Rudd and Wong will do to Australians -

- Wipe them out economically through carbon taxation.

- To achieve that requires, and this is the real motivation - and not the Greens’ lie, the imposition of nothing less than totalitarian rule and their statements demonstrate this. There is no other basis upon which Rudd can impose his anti-Carbon plans, and they are extensive and exhaustive in reach.

What they announced amounts to nothing less than a full blown communiust regime that echoes the thugs who ruled Europe, with a bit of fascism thrown in good measure, reinforced by other ‘policies’. I’m not being funny, nor exaggerating things. The above is central to it, and already does work in substantiating this claim.

Rudd is no Christian. What he is doing is anti-Christian, anti-Catholic, and descending into horrifying savagery. The corruption of many Australian children is a very secure manifestation of where things have been heading, and now Rudd and Wong are in ‘power’.

They are lying to Australians because it is not about the Greens’ lie as such. It is about seizing totalitarian control over Australians. The “Right” put this fascist parasite into office, because they are Statists too. They crave power, they see nothing wrong with tyranny. They differ with Rudd only over who should rule and enslave Australians and immiserate them.

I end this section by observing, it is an absolute disagrace, the “Right”, who have nearly destroyed the Liberal Party, are also guilty of corruption of children. They held States’ and Federal Governments. Some of them who were in the Federal Cabinet boasted that they had successfully raised programmes for the purpose - brainwashing children into the Stalinist Greens’ cult of death. A shocking, appalling disgrace.

It’s not only Toorak Brahman and Doctor’s wives who demand Socialist dictatorship environmental compassion.

The Woottons, a USSR soapie re-run telling the story about wealthy capitalist pigs who forgot why it was ever possible for their ancestors to get rich and then reproduce Marx’s useful idiots ‘the new generation’. While farting Co2 emissions as they munch crinkle nuts and olive crispies coated in cream, while confused they saw the red light and, raising clenched fists, cried:

Raise the hammer and sickle over Australians, Yu bewdy Kev and Penny Wong! We’ll teach those slimy things called modest Australians - erm what Marx said - the thingummy about material, concrete unalientated true life is all about. Down with the lumpenmasse!

They wrote out a $10 million dollar cheque to fund hard, treacherous Leftists and, readers, this is neither joke nor fiction.

“Mark Wootton (chair) with his wife Eve Kantor own, manage and live on a 12,000 acre grazing property at Hamilton, Victoria. Mark is also a director of the Poola Foundation. Poola’s current responsibility is to distribute the funds of the late Tom Kantor, Eve’s brother. $10-million from this fund has been used to establish The Climate Institute. The impetus for this was simple: a belief that the extreme urgency of the situation requires decisive commitment and action from government and industry on a grand scale.”

They couldn’t sink $10m into an entrepreneurial venture producing things for customers and creating a few opportunities for eager, budding capitalists and some seeking a job. No, they threw $10m (plus) at thugs bent on totalitarianism. What great Australians. What great humanitarians.

A member of the board of “the Climate Institute”, is a Dr Hugh Saddler, currently the Managing Director of Energy Strategies Pty Ltd. This company hopes to make a fortune out of the destruction of existing production through ‘redesign’ of all sorts of ‘goods’.

Mr. Rudd announced on radio this morning what he foreshadowed in Parliament; many capital and consumer goods will be compulsorily scrapped. Capital will have to be squandered on reinventing products, and consumers will also under ‘government’ compulsion go to great expense replacing what are good goods. What this means is, this alone will savage Australians - but, it won’t get to that, because carbon taxation will destroy capital first.

Friends of the Woottons, diseased Leftists.

The Australian Conservation Foundation (a front of the Greens, which also receives stolen goods per tax transfers into its coffers), The Australian Council of Social Service, and the Australian Council of Trade Unions.

Dean Mighell, boss of the hard left ETU on radio this morning, “electrical tradesmen are on the frontline of fight climate change”.

I see, cutting electricity cables. Economic sabotage and that, really, is what Mighell and his ETU with Sharan Burrow and her fellow ACTU thugs are trying to commit, on a grander scale than flinging a few hundreds thousands out of jobs and onto the heap of the unemployed by effectve minimum wages (rates higher than market rates and can only be imposed by coercion).

Their Aims:

Outrighteconomic destruction of Australians and Australia, complemented by genuinely totalitarian control.

“Investment is key to a 4th July Carbon Independence Day
The independent Climate Institute today broadly welcomed the Garnaut Review’s draft report which lays bare the stark costs for Australia of inaction on climate change and urged the Government to focus on investment in clean energy and low carbon technologies in its consideration of the report.

“Meeting emission reduction targets and building the clean-energy alternatives will generate trillions of dollars of investment opportunities. Australia needs policies to ensure all new electricity load generation comes from clean energy and that support, not hinder, investment in clean energy and low carbon technologies.”

They demand the destruction of what are economically efficient and in fact very clean, coal based energy companies. This is curious, for it is what the CIS demands. Next to the Peony Company, is the Centre of Independent Studies receiving funds from those behind the “Climate Institute”?

Can Greg Lindsay explain the Woottons?

Andrew Landeryou (1) has plenty of shopping on the treacherous Leftists the Woottons lurve. It escapes the Woottons but once the old-Marxist cum neo-Marxist revolution is completed, as in Russia, Vietnam, Cuba etc, their pals will take them outside and shove a bullet or two in their sheep poo filled craniums.

Kevin Rudd has enlisted “The Climate Institute” as one of his number one ‘climate’ expert and political activist clunk tanks. I have the image of the type that trundled through Europe with a cannon blasting the living daylights out of good people and all good things in the name of bringing about paradise - to modest types it is known as socialist hell.

PS

It seems the Woottons haven’t told their more modest neighbours they will be sending in the Red Brigade to blow up their lives. You can tell that they haven’t, because they have not yet fled from the pitchfork wielding uppity kulaks of Hamilton.