Mangled Thoughts

It’s real, and it is state ordered murder.

The Bracks and Brumby, Orwellian titled “ABORTION LAW REFORM BILL” (2008) was passed in the lower House last week. It was put through without debate. Cabinet banned debate in Parliament on the Bill. Its cognate bill, the Bill for killing of the defenceless euphemistically called, Medical Treatment (Physician Assisted Dying) Bill 2008, was defeated on the 10th of this month. The only difference between the two bills is:

Who can be killed under each bill.

The crucial terms of each Bill were related in,

“There is a certain stench of death in this building today….”

Under each bill, it is a criminal offence for any doctor and nurse to refuse to commit killing of anyone prescribed for killing. This includes doctors and nurses who, understandably refusing to kill, refuse to refer a ‘patient’ to those who are prepared to kill.

The reasons why the killing of the born bill was defeated was because debate and free ‘conscience’ voting was permissable and it is obvious why. If, as the abortion bill, it had been rammed through Parliament most Victorians, not only doctors and nurses, would have realised the truth of the bill and would have gone for the jugular of the Cabinet.

Brumby threw in a pretence. To ensure culpability could not be sheeted home to him and his Cabinet of absolutist thugs, should it be passed, they sponsored the bill as a private members bill. They gave their support to a member of the Greens Nazi Party, one Colleen Hartland MLC. Secondly, allowed debate and a “conscience vote”. It is a cognate bill, and both Bracks and Brumby are guilty, more so since it was they who prepared the abortion bill when Catholic Steve Bracks was Premier. Mr. Fascist Slob pretending to be a saint Mr. Steve Bracks enthusiastically supported the abortion bill.

Cardinal Archbishop George Pell never said a word. Neither did he condemen Liberals under Kennett for preparing the anti-Bill of Rights, the Blasphemy and Kowtow to Mulism Fascists Bill, and the Let’s turn the STO-OPA into a crime syndicate Bills, all implemented and carried on by Steve Bracks and John Brumby and their Cabinet of lying parasites. Now that nice Mr. Christian and Devout Catholic Steve Bracks is not Premier, the Church is condemning both bills and has declared its hospitals in Victoria will be shutdown should the bill pass the upper house.

A Digression

I notice the Church is not also attacking another very obvious totalitarian overthrow of the real rights of individuals. Why not? Discount the neo-Marxist thugs that have corrupted various offices and associations of the Church, there is no excuse for the “Orthodox’s” failure to mount a hard offensive on all counts. None what so ever.

The Church Catholic asserts the dignity and liberty of individuals above all else and this includes collectivist thugs - including Fascist Kevin Rudd another pseudo-Catholic. Why the cowardice, with all respect to Cardinal Archbishop Pell? You do, George, recollect a conversation on A’Beckett and the point I drew your attention to?

Freedom of the individual, George, freedom in economic action, property rights, the individual was in contention, not A’Beckett’s sanctity. I’ll go further, George, A’Beckett failed badly in these matters and in his failure sapped the King who adavanced these grave priorities by binding the crown to upholding the rule of Coomon Law- exactly what has been overthrown around Australia and crushingly in Victoria.

The above is the sort of Nazi policies, plus the Greens’ Death Cult that can be and are the upshot. Styling yourself, George, on A’Beckett, you might care to rectify his very bad mistake. At least you now have a common motive.

What has transpired in Victoria is what I have warned of in the past, it is also an assault on the freedom of the Church. However, since the clerical ranks include the likes of those who have wrecked the Liberal Party, know it all illiterates, the orthodox have never defended anything worth defending. It is called defeat by self-inflcited stupidity and cretinism due to, the senior ranks are drawn from the same two closed gene pools the necortic right and diseased Leftists such as Bracks and Rudd are drawn from. What, for example, Fisher, Chifley and Curtin, terrors of the diseased Left! Good jokes, George.

I have not altogether digressed; only slightly digressed. Rather topical really,and not only on this grave matter.

The Bills are ordered to giving the appearance of legitimacy to State ordered murder

That doctors and nurses commit criminal offences if they co-operate in any way. The Bills explicitly set out, the “State” orders them to kill on pain of criminal prosecution. All other translations of the Bills are excluded by the terms of the Bills, the “State” orders them to kill, or co-operate in killing, even by “referrals”.

In the name of Victorians, the bloody socilaist slobs in Spring Street, and their equals in the Opposition, ignorant, unprincipled Statist slobs pretending to be Liberals, will turn doctors and nurses into murderers. It’s not whom and when killed, and when ‘requested’. It is the fact all doctors and nurses must kill that is decisive. This, this makes these bills Bills for the execution of “State”pordered murder.

It is not “State” santioned killing, leaving such horrific acts to the discretion of individuals. It directs all to engage in each act. This is deliberate murder by the “State” by use of police state powers to force, on pain of punishment, all doctors and nurses to commit the deeds.

It is stark naked that every politician and bureaucrat who supports these bills, instead of forcing doctors and nurses to do it, and without the fiction of ‘legalistic’ paperwork, should:

Have the guts of their intent and walk into hospitals and homes and murder all those they decide should be killed, and face the consequence before a stiff in common law and uncompromising Judge. This is what the two bills are about.

The Premier of Victoria, John Brumby is a Liar

On radio this week, he said any who from conscience cannot commit State ordered murdered are not required to do so. Liar. They are, by aiding and abetting even if only by refusing to recommend others perpetrate “State” ordered murder. Refusal to refer to those prepared to kill is a criminal offence, as is also attempts to prevent it - even by word alone.

Neil Mitchell is committing fraud

Thanks to the nepotistic Right, there are no genuine, gutsy Liberals in the media. 3AW was recommended to me as an answer to hard Left news outlets. Wrong! The differences between it and, say, ABC are:

- Sodding taxpayer doesn’t have to pay for their drivel.

-ABC disc jocks, though ignoramuses too, pretend to be intelligent and cultivated. 3AW disc jocks don’t, thankfully, entertain a whiff of these pretensions.

Derryn Hinch, pro-abortion, has struggled with the force of the abortion bill. His Kampf was short and feeble. On air one day, he simply asserted his stock line, “it’s a woman’s right to choose”.

Neil Mitchell, last week was nasty to a caller who related the Bills are what the Nazi Party did. Mitchell replied, “Rubbish and nonsense!”. The ignoramus, Mitchell, should apologise to 3AW listeners for perpetration of a false account of history and thus cheating them. This morning, however, he was caught out by a GP:

Dr Gross, GP, was born deformed and declared, ‘this is what the Nazis did’. She is definitely not Catholic and might be an atheist. She put up a sign outside her practice: ” I do not perform abortions. Neither do I refer patients to those who do.” She continued, “if the Bill is passed in the Upper House next week, I will defy it.”

This caught Mitchell out. Being a GP, he did not attack her, unlike the ordinary caller. He did, though, still deny it. This makes the man a liar, because, pretending to be engaged in the ‘debate’ and contributing to the ‘debate’, he is unmistakeably refusing to allow history to intrude into what he and Hinch are effectively doing, running propaganda on behalf of “State” ordered murder.

Yet, we do not have to look only to the past. We also have the charnal house called the Netherlands as an example. Chirldren are now being murdered. The Dutch Government is committing what the Nazis did, killing all deemed unfit to have been born, and to live. That’s right, State directed murder of children up to early adolescent age ( 11 years of age), and up to the elderly.

If the Abortion Bill is passed, the euthanasia bill will be reintroduced and passed

They are cognate bills. The Nazis didn’t invent their ‘euthanasia’ progrom, T4. The ground had been prepared duriong the late 19th century to the 1930’s. Diseased Leftists had successfully pumped their horrendous notions under propaganda cliches, ‘merciful deaths’, ‘end of suffering’, ‘it would be cruel to let them live’ ( i.e. malformed unborn), and so forth.

The pin was the cult of nature and this, as then, is a “State” cult but today it is called “environment(alism)”, with the equation of man and animals. The stock cant phrase today is, ” we kill wounded animals, so why can’t we be put out of our pain too?”

Who is running this infantile propaganda campaign? The so-called answer to hard left broadcasters namely SBS and ABC, 3AW is one station that is. Where are the ‘heroes’ of the camotose “Right”. They are camotose - “No time for this, it doesn’t pay. Besides, it means we’d have to stick our necks out in public.”

What a disgrace.

The abortion bill, if passed, will be run for a couple of years before reintroducing its cognate.

The reason is obvious. The defences of Victorians will be broken down, they having been inured to “State” ordered murder of the unborn. Look at many another bill passed but a matter of years before was rightly attacked for what they still are, Statist usurpation of freedoms.

It’s the principle of erosion. Water on rock grinds rock over time - if there is no active defence. This is what those fascist bastards leading the “Republican” movement, including Malcolm Turnbull, are counting on, as have the Nazi Greens Party - and look what the unprincipled cowards of the “Right” alone have delivered to these diseased, lying Leftists.

Red Ted Baillieu and the dancing blobs

They are what is palmed off as Liberal Party MPs. Some of them did oppose the “euthanasia” bill. David Davis ( Upper House), however, stated it would have passed if it had been drafted correctly. There is a right why to make, by police state coercion, doctors and nurses murderers?!

Passage of the ABORTION LAW REFORM BILL 2008

The Lower House divided Ayes 49, Noes 32, as follows and with Liberal Party Members in bold:

Ms Allan; Mr Andrews; Ms Asher; Mr Baillieu; Ms Barker; Mr Batchelor; Ms Beattie; Mr Brooks; Mr Brumby; Mr Carli; Mr Crutchfield; Ms Duncan; Mr Eren; Mr Foley; Ms Green; Mr Hardman; Dr Harkness; Mr Helper; Mr Herbert; Mr Holding; Mr Hudson; Mr Ingram; Ms Kosky; Mr Lim; Mr Lupton; Mrs Maddigan; Ms Morand; Mr Morris; Ms Munt; Mr Nardella; Ms Neville; Mr Noonan; Ms Overington; Mr Pallas; Mr Pandazopoulos; Mr Perera; Ms Pike; Mrs Powell; Ms Richardson; Mr Robinson; Mr Scott; Mrs Shardey; Mr Stensholt; Ms Thomson (Footscray); Mr Trezise; Ms Wooldridge; Mr Wynne. Tellers: Ms D’Ambrosio; Mr Langdon.

Ms Pike is Bronwyn Pike, who is a Uniting Church Reverendess. Then again, she is one of the diseased, neo-Marxist dribbling Leftists who have made their fortunes preaching against Christ and destruction of the bad old capitalist West.

I recollect a gaggle of clerics in ‘training’ saying, when it the first time she stood as an ALP candidate was announced , “Now, all will see what a real Christian can do.”. The name Christ being code for Marx neofied by these middle-calls-wealthy-spoilt-brats-idiotenlumpenmasse.

Louise Asher - The Victorian Liberal Parliamentary Party’s version of the Federal’s Julie Bishop. These two can arrange an ‘exchange trip’, no-one could tell the difference between them if they occupied each other’s seats.

NOES 32

Mr Blackwood; Mr Burgess; Mr Cameron; Ms Campbell; Mr Clark; Mr Crisp; Mr Delahunty; Mr Dixon; Mr Donnellan; Mr Hodgett; Mr Hulls; Miss Kairouz; Ms Lobato; Mr McIntosh; Mr Merlino; Mr Mulder; Dr Napthine; Mr Northe; Mr O’Brien; Mr Ryan; Mr Seitz; Mr Smith (Bass); Mr Smith (Warrandyte); Mr Thompson (Sandringham); Mr Tilley; Mrs Victoria; Mr Wakeling; Mr Walsh; Mr Weller; Mr Wells. Tellers: Mrs Fyffe; Mr Kotsiras.

16 Liberals out of 21 voted no. The two Liberal tellers being tellers on the vote could not, of course vote. Perhaps it’s a turn up. Ted’s in a minority of 5. It’s 5 too many and we will serve up why in a separate article, it doesn’t simply turn on state ordered murder.

We shall wait for next week’s Upper House vote before writing up the item - after all, as David Davis (who ruins a perfectly good blue ribbon seat in that House) indicated, there is sufficient support for “State” ordered murdered of the defenceless born. It’s conditional on only a Bill for it beings framed the right way. It’s rather like ‘wannabe’ Fuhrer, Malcolm Turnbull, and his ministers such as idiot Greg Hunt and sellout Ian MacFarlane, who chirrup gaily daily, “capital destruction by Co2 taxes is good if they are implemented the “right way”.

Needless to say, the diseased Left plumped for State ordered murder of the defenceless en-mass and, if he were still in Parliament and since he raised it, so would have Steve Bracks. Ha! The daddy of Brackistan was “represented” by Red Ted, making it a 50 to 32 division.

It is due to keynesian policies, Central Banks and Statist Government. The question to keep in clear view is, how did it come to this?

Central to keynesianitis is the fallacy consumption drives economic growth. Hence the reliance on the aggregate GDP. According to this ‘indicator’, consumption is 2/3 of economic activity. To this, demand can be raised by central banks engaging in monetary expansion. The alarm over the credit crunch around the world, and heightened into panic by the collapse of Lehmen Branches, AIG, and Fanny and Mae, is due to these fallacies.

It is savings, capital accumulation, that fuels growth. Production is 2/3 of expenditure, against the misleading aggregate GDP. It is the disruption of the framework of prices and its impact on manufacturing that is the worry, and occurs before housing and share-market bubbles burst. This is the worry, how much damage has been done to savings?

The above points are neatly demonstrated here:

US Economy’s Bubble: Casting the Recession Runes

Some reactions to the crisis -

Have been appalling.

RBA
Comments such as as, ‘it’s not Glen Stevens’ (head of the RBA) fault’ and ‘he’s done a very good job in very difficult conditions’, have been generously published in newspapers. Thus, such dismal articles as this:

Reserve Bank not to blame for our sub-prime battlers

He’s not done a good job at all. He’s responsible for what is driving the recession in Australia.

It’s not him personally. It’s his and his seconds’ in the RBA keynesianism that is the culprit, as their predecessors for for past recessions and depressions, and it is reprehensible. Failure to nail this, and its rectification means the same will occur again in the future. It’s also a damning reflection on not only RBA, but also the commentariat and the Universities. Keynesianism is the ‘mainstream’ assumption.

Cabinet and Opposition

Last week things degenerated rather swiflty. Early in the week the bipartisan response to crisis was imposition of a ban on short selling. Short selling, and long selling are very important actions; banning them causes great damage in markets. Next, Rudd announcing an overall intensification and extension of controls over markets.

He finished on Saturday by announcing that he will use taxpayers to buy up bad debt. Swann expanded; this will “inject liquidity into the market”. Injecting liquidity is what caused the crisis, it is credit expansion. Yet, the government cannot do this, only the RBA can. This leaves only what he did declare:

They, Rudd and Swann dictated many Australian taxpayers are now liable for others’ bad debt. They will sap Australians’ savings to buy it and to cover the liabilities. Swann said, Treasury will ’securitise’ the bad debt and sell them to investors.

‘Securitisation’ was driven by keynesian credit expansion and it is this last that brought down Lehman Brothers, and AIG. Central Bank credit expansion and the mechanism of its distribution, fractional banking, is why they collapsed. There is no market, certainly not at the moment, for junk. Don’t take my word for it; here’s Martin Jacomb, who is a former director of that Central Bank the Bank of England in an article:

“Conditions in credit markets awash with easy money were made to seem even more benign with the growth of securitisation. This is the process whereby banks bundle up a package of loans, such as residential mortgages, and then slice these up into tranches of differing qualitiy, so that these tranches can be sold to incvestors outsid eof the banking system. Thus banks were thus enabled to expand the volume of their lending….It also supposedly diversified risk.”

(Sir Martin Jacomb, From Northern Rock to Lehman: who should share the blame? Spectator, 20/9/08).

It’s unamusing to note that while it is contained in the quote, Jacomb did not finger the villain, kenynesian policies (for which he is also responsible). Later in the article he briefly commented that in time; buyers of bad loans might reappear, and then only if the loans are sufficiently discounted. “Securitised” bad debt is, Mr. Swann, worthless; just a bonfire on which to destroy good money, money that government takes by coercion.

Some Media responses to Rudd’s decision

To foist bad debt on that hapless sod called taxpayer, over the weekend:

“It will ‘inject liquidity into the markets”‘; “restore markets”; “its a good thing because it means we can make profits again”‘; “business will recover”.

Janet Albrechtsen

Married to a mate of Murdoch’s (of course talent got her a job on The Australian), this wealthy, sympathetic economics expert blamed the modest man in the street and his and her reasonable desire to own a home:

“perverse incentives that allowed consumers to take a one-way bet when they borrowed money… for every episode of predatory lending there was plenty of predatory borrowing.”

They could get away with their crimes, according to Janet, because they faced no punitive consequences. Well, those who failed to meet their payments did pay: they have lost all that they did pay; it’s called homelessness.

These vicious bastards were, according to Janet, in collusion with another pack of “evildoers”, (non central) bankers, dealers, brokers and any other low-lifer making their way in markets. Together, they conspired to bring down some companies and the whole wide world.

What else is to be expected of Janet, who did her bit to undermine Howard, destroy the campaign for free labour markets and called for a nazi style coup de tat as her solution to defeating the hard Left. Janet fancies herself as warrior for Liberty. Destroying causes she claims to fight for is a weird notion of heroism before the enemy.

It has clearly not occurred to Janet, nor has she bothered lifting a finger to find out, the massive credit expansion by central banks ends up somewhere. It ends up in mortgages and credit card debts. Then, why should she. The CIS and IPA are as incompetent as the newspaper commentariat, and the economics writesr of the Australian are also appallingly bad. Callous, ignorant, deaf, dumb, and blind, Janet has a snowflake’s chance of coming to grips with what is behind the crisis.

Andrew Bolt
According to this Cambridge don in economics, ‘inflation is the price you pay for a successful, booming economy’.

What else is to be expected of someone whose ‘economic advice’ comes from the likes of those clowns in the HR Nicholls Society. Oh, and whose vicious attack on Co2 taxes is to say, it means price rises, as opposed to destruction of capital. It’s understandable why Bolt avoids mentioning capital destruction: he fully supports capital destruction through a particular Co2 tax, ethanol production, and this is wiping out food production around the world.

John Quiggin He attributes the crisis to, in good hard Leftist fashion, to the ‘internal contradiction’ of capitalism. The disaster was inevitable. Except for one thing, keynesiantis policies are against free markets.

Quiggin believes he can get away with his oily deception and he is right up to a point. CIS and IPA are not engaged in free market economics and defence of free markets. They have done great damage in both endeavours.

What Quiggin runs away from is debate with those who can defend free markets, and it is clear why he does. Feeling superior,Quiggin used to smugly write very nasty ‘criticisms’ of Jackson and his work. His sense of his greatness did not last, it was beaten out of him by Jackson in searing articles. Mention the name Brookesnews and Jackson, and Quiggin flees to the hills, or at least under his bed. Yes, Quiggin is another gutless cretin whose equals are vicious fishwives.

It’s been the diseased Left’s chorus line, the crisis is the proof against ‘free market ideology’. Christine Milne of the Nazi Greens Party freely declared so in the Senate, and why not. There is no-one in the Liberal Party, in both Houses, capable of demolishing that lie and defending free markets.

Prediction

Not one of them predicted the crisis, not that they could. Arsenic purveyed as economic theory is no grounds for prediction. The exceptions are those who work from the within the framework of Austrian school monetary theory, and I retained in my pc from the 1990’s articles demonstrating this. Oddly enough, those pertinent to the Australian scene are by Jackson.

Here is one startling prediction, delivered in 2004 (US economy: storm clouds ahead):

“I’m betting on another recession in or around 2008. Of course it’s possible that the economy might begin to slow much sooner.”

Jackson over the last few years, has repeatedly warned of the storm that is now breaking, thanks to the RBA’s massive monetary expansion since the 1980’s.

He predicted the 1990’s recession -

Is Australia heading for a “recession we had to have”?

It was, however, temporarily arrested by the RBA. It engaged in a massive monetary expansion from January 1996 to June 2005.

Australian economy, recession and the trade cycle
Monday 22 August 2005

In, Now for the Clinton economy Bush has inherited( December 2000), he related:

“In the last few months at least 250,000 jobs have gone, with about 45,000 or more going in November. For the last five months jobs losses have averaged about 52,000 a month or more… the vast majority of job losses have been in manufacturing.”

In, American economy looking worse( March 2001) he observed:

“A few more figures will illustrate just how bad the monetary situation really is. Consumer credit grew by $135 billion in 2000, compared with nearly $100 billion in 1999, a 35 per cent leap, while 1999 was 50 per cent up on 1998. Not surprisingly, non-mortgage credit has been racing ahead. It has now reached the point where spending is exceeding income. This is what I call a real monetary shot in the arm — and it’s Dr Greenspan who wielded the needle. In the meantime the personal saving rate fell to –1 per cent in January….

“We have seen that though consumption is still rising manufacturing is still going south. Nevertheless, many commentators defy reality by parroting the argument that consumption accounts for about 75 per cent of final demand in the US economy consumption spending must be the key to recovery and prosperity.

“Wrong. Consumption is about 38 per cent of total spending, if that. The manner in which GDP is calculated conceals this vital fact. Therefore, it is not consumption spending that needs to rise but spending in the higher stages of production — and this means more savings. However, as there will never be enough savings to save the malinvestments that Greenspan’s reckless monetary policy created a shakeout is unavoidable.”

The mainstream media and the think tanks have been, to quote one of their number, “caught by surprise”. Jackson wasn’t, but it’s not him, its the framework of theory that ensured he wasn’t caught by surprise.

Returning to the beginning

What sparked this item is the actions of the RBA, Rudd and Swann, Turnbull and Bishop. It’s not clear how severe this recession will be but, this lot have given every indication that they will find a way to compound it. On the other hand, Rudd proceeds with Co2 taxes and central planning (which was the policy of the regime of the USSR and thus it collapsed), and the question of severity will seem, in retrospect, rather trivial.

It’s come about by ‘professional economists’ and a commentariat drilled into the arsenic of keynesianism. The RBA, and statist politicians committed to keynesian policies. The trouble this time is that the crisis is being used by the hard Left, and statist politicians as an excuse to attack free markets.

In the case of the Rudd Cabinet, free markets is totally incompatible with their fascist aims. Worse, the ‘Right’ and their anti-free market think tanks are also causing great damage.

This morning the Premier of Brackistan, Brumby, declared Rudd should follow the keynesian prescription, a massive increase in Federal Government consumption. The Rudd cabinet needs no such encouragement; it has already rocked up billions of extras in squander. Brumby also called on Glen Stevens to commit another round of credit expansion. He said he will advise Rudd this afternoon. Great, just spiffingly wonderful.

As I write this, Glen Stevens has announced another round of credit expansion. Echoes of 1991.

It truly is appalling that despite the record of Keynesianism, one disaster after another, it is nonetheless adhered to. It is the crisis is not a spur to return to something tried and true, sound money.

More tomorrow.

In comments, Tim Blair considered response to, “Liberal Party News: “Betraying party members and Australians is fun”, is:

“You are mentally ill”

I appreciate pyschology can be absorbed in three weeks flat, but degrees in science and postgrad in neuro-science?

It might also be observed, it is not a good thing to do, because it’s a fusion of sound science with the muck of psychology. However, I thank Tim for his evident concern. I do have a complaint and I had to visit the local chemist for a cure, cough drops.

Someone cynical on the other hand would conclude Blair has demonstrated once again, and he has done it a few times, the “Right’s” typical response, jerk knee and come out smearing. I had occasion to remind someone else who did this in comments that to be effective, a bit of mud flinging must be delivered within a framework of rebuttal and Blair has, once again failed to secure this. In Blair’s case, this is most likely due to sensitivity, whereas of, for example, the CIS, IPA, and Kroger Kronies Party, it’s donor’s money, arrogance, and blind stupidity.

Still sensitivity doesn’t excuse Tim Blair ignoring what was set out in, “Liberal Party News… is fun”. Could Tim be committing the same sin that stamps the putrefying “Right”? If it’s a toss up between them and the ruination of millions of Australians, millions of Australians can get stuffed. This is more than a little pointed.

Malcolm Turnbull is another power hungry, unprincipled ignoramus. This man declared when he was Minister for the Temple of the Greens’ Death cult, the Department of the Environment, Government must force the prices of goods up. Energy is a priority, because, he declared, that will make usage more effficient and will combat greenhouse gases.

Apart from being an ignoramus in science, Turnbull is witlessly pushing economic inefficiency and cutting supply to Australians, while wealthy types like him enjoy a really comfy life. He is an economic dumbkopf. He is psychopathic with it, because he is committed to destroying capital through carbon taxation, as he has already demonstrated on the Bills one related in the article. What does Tim Blair make of this buffoon:

A promising start from Malcolm Turnbull:

This is also comical; “Turnbull also took aim at Wayne Swan”. Tim links an article that purpotedly shows what a terror of the hard Left Turnbull is. It is rubbish, tripe. It is appallingly bad. It might also be observed since, it seems, Tim hasn’t noticed it but the ALP has been shredding the Liberal Party in the Parliament. What happened this week in Parliament this week is only a symptom of how bad they and their advisers are, and what an effortless, fun time the hard Left are having. This, Tim, is their form.

The arrogant Right’s contempt for the modest man, and that they live in a steel enclosed gene pool doesn’t only mean they are intellectually dead. Other symptoms might seem trivial to some but let’s see:

They are blind to voters. The Liberal Party is gutted of members who have left in digust, and membership is still bleeding. Secondly, the insouciant Right have so discredited genuine Liberal Principles, it is becoming commonpace to hear the man in the street to call for a return to protectionism and ‘industry polcies’. This isn’t merely the ALP and the ACTU, this is the man in the street calling for it. Radio is flooded with callers saying things. I have taken to a bit of activism and as a part of it, ask modest Australians about their concern, and they tell me the same things.Yet, it is worse than this:

The ‘know it all’ “Right” have so discredited free markets, and this driven by error shot economics, the man in the street is increasingly agreeing with the diseased Left that free markets is an ideology.

Contempt for the man in the street is also contempt for the voter and this is where fights are won or lost. The Right treat the modest modest man as a serf with the intelligence of a retarded child; they are to be indulged, patronised and will do what they are told. If that were the case, then why didn’t they do what they were told at successive states’ elections and the 2007 Federal election. To point this up:

It was the assumption of those clowns, the HR Nicholls Society, with special attention to the central figures culpable for destroying what was a sound and thus highly moral campaign for free labour markets. Namely, Hugh Morgan, Des Moore, Ray Evans, Nick Minchin, Peter Costello (as a Nobel prize winning economist he was bloody clueless too), Kroger, Kroger’s $4,000 a week lickspittle “Iron Man July” Julian Sheezel. Morgan, Evans and Moore, however, were the architects of this catastrophe, and it is clear Tim Blair never did ping them for what they did.

As a matter of fact, in first The New Australian and then its successor, Brookesnews, Jackson was warning the Liberal Party, if they followed the tripe pumped out by those three incompetents reform would be blown out of the water. And, Tim, it was worse than bad. They only conceded every falsehood the ACTU relied on to defeat labour market reform. On the other hand, looking back, this lot were not about defending free labour markets. They were about ‘reforming’, as it were, labour, and they assumed voters would obey them.

Morgan smiled into the camera that he believed loved him in 2005. Oh, the ABC camera did love him but not for the reasons he assumed. That night, he not only completed the destruction of the fight, he blew the Liberal Party out the federal election waters ahead of the 2007 election. In 2005, ACTU commissioned a top US pollster who confirmed this. He told voters they will do what he and pals tell them, including an election clinching detail.

Voters correctly drew the conclusion these lot of wrecking morons were stating, modest Australians were paid too much and will take a massive pay cuts. $3,000 a week Andrew Bolt reinforced this cheering news by telling modest Australians they are wealthy and are ingrates for not appreciating how well off they are. This week in Parliament, ACTU boss and now Senator, Cameron stood up in the House and delivered an effective speech with the sort of venom the gutless Right wouldn’t dare against the hard Left.

He assailed them for their contempt of modest Australians, on modest pay, in real jobs that involves real work. He hammered them for not giving a stuff about the realities of what they face. He also hammered them over reality of collapsing manufacturing. Cameron is hard left, a Union thug but for all that, he had list of telling good point, and while he is wrong in the explanation, he is genuinely concerned about what he raised.

Then there is the march of the diseased Leftists, as observed in the first article of today. The idiot “Right” have been so successful that the Greens Nazi Party are emerging as a major Party while the Liberal Party is being reduced to a rump party the size of a flea. The membership numbers demonstrate this.

The bastards wrecking the Liberal Party have choked the Party, in order to retain their death grip over it. They are protected by ignorant journalists. So, we end up with:

-The Statist blobs stuffing Victorian Parliamentary seats.
-Fascist slobs stuffing Parliamentary seats.

According to Tim Blair, these are effective Liberals. Mind, I can see why. His pals in Victoria have stuffed Victorian Federal seats with cretins. The Victorian Division is about to be wiped out and this means the Federal seats will be wiped out too. This is such a splendid success that now I appreciate why diseased Lefts are carted of to hospitals for heart attack operations, the strain of laughing uncontrollably takes its toll on the ticker organ.

To sum up this reply so far:

What is at stake are grave matters which have tremendous impact on Australians and their prosperity. It requires solid principles to

- To work them them out accurately and in order for effective action.

- To present the case to the man in the street, it is they who must be convinced of truths.

- To fight the Left

The above requires robust intellectual engagement. It requires activism. It requires spine. It requires energy. These are the very qualities the decaying “Right” is devoid of, and they destroyed good causes, wrecked the Liberal Party and have only succeeded in putting the likes of Bracks, Brumby and Rudd into office, and fuelling the Nazi Greens Party. To cap it all off, what sits opposite these fascist bastards is no better.

What it reduces to is a pack of shallow, conceited, venal dunderheads playing games with the lives of millions of Australians while pretending to be their best friends. The example of the genuine concern of ACTU heavy, Senator Cameron, is a rather pointed contrast. It shows, the Federal Liberal Party sees nothing wrong with wiping out capital through carbon taxes and thus ruining millions of Australians. This is what these stone idle lounge cushions support and,

Tim Blair sees nothing wrong in all that!

What disturbs him is being pinged over covering for these useful idiots, and pointing out his pals in the IPA, and Bolt and Albrechtsen have caused great damage and have entrenched the worst. No, that’s a mistake.

They are useful, very useful to the diseased Left, but then Tim Blair also joined in. After all, Blair, that is what the business of blacklisting and smearing Jackson is all about, to damage his reputation as a fine economist, in order to prop up incompetent cowards busy only in wrecking good causes and destroying the Liberal Party, and sapping Australians with it. Blair gave his fulsome support to this, at the HR Nicholls Society.

This will do for today. On Monday, we bring in a few more points that are a tad devestating. How Tim Blair can continue believing in his heroes of the Press and in the Party, and in the clunker tanks is, some hold, a puzzle. I must strenuously disagree. A man who has mastered all that is prequisite to practice psychiatry in three weeks flat, can’t be shallow. Oh, there is a defect, the component psychology; this leads good men astray, but I defy anyone to say it has lead Tim Blair astray.

My friend Strider signalled “have compiled full list of the embattled companies which have been funding the IPA, which may now turn off the money as they fight to stay afloat…” We can inform, the list is due to a leak that has, oddly enough, sprung in the hull of the IPA. Let’s call it, Leonardo.

It’s a fascinating list too. Still doing some research based on the list and so for now, one is struck by a contradiction, with exceptions that will be mused on. It can be phrased in a few questions: Why would companies, being strangled and torn up by each tier of government and agencies, fund a think tank that has:

- Failed miserably to fight hard and win against the very measures and instruments by which government is shredding them?

- Has helped government to strangle them by imposing measures ‘the right way’?

- What does this disclose of directors of the companies facing death by a thousand cuts?

What stands out with sparkling clarity is that as the Centre for Independent Studies the IPA is as a blowfly to food (money); it zooms in and attaches itself to it like glue. The usual action is to prevent this by sealing food and spraying poison to eradicate the pests. Not the directors of the companies. The CISand IPA are very good at buttering Directors and steering them. They have to be, because those Directors have poured at a minimum $30-40m into these two clunker tanks and for it nothing has been achieved and worse:

They have been sold out by Greg Lindsay’s pension plan and the Kemp family’s cash cow. The CIS, unchecked, is openly selling out companies, with a couple of exceptions, by lobbying for Co2 taxes and having written the propaganda script for capital destruction day through Co2 taxes Rudd and his gang of thugs freely draw from. Even better, Nick Gruen, who is the CIS’ expert Hayekian, and he cocks this right up too, advises the Rudd fascist Cabinet.

Hmmm, since he is in receipt of taxpayers’ funds, and taxpayers have a right to know such things: How much are you being paid for this sell out to the Fascist Rudd Cabinet, Nick Gruen? Well, it’s a handy job isn’t it.

He can brief Rudd in detail on the CIS’‘right way’ to destroy Australians. Perhaps he is advising Rudd on how to compound the damage caused by keynesiantis, by, oh, short-selling bans. Whatever, Gruen’s advice can’t be good for Australians, given Rudd and co like it and throw Australians’ hard earned stolen property at it.

So, taken with the IPA, company Directors’ are taking shareholders’ funds and throwing it down a wealthy man’s version of professional dole bludging, unlike all those made unemployed due to anti-free labour market effective minimum price fixing. CIS’ star defender of Lindsay’s super fund, Professor Saunders, had the hide to say that modest Australians made unemployed for that genuine reason should be turned from dole bludging and made to beg for what is otherwise just compensation for thuggery against modest Australians. Saunders called it ‘mutual obligations’.

It never occurs to the CISand IPA, they have a ‘mutual obligation’. They have had a $30-40ms+ mutual obligation and have not fulfilled it. They have had a fun time, lolling about in their clubrooms doing anything but fulfill it. Some say, they have had a fun time wrecking the things they are supposed to deliver on. Some are rather irritated they have managed worse than this.

Can Directors’ justify to shareholders throwing their funds at wealthy parasites who are destroying the causes they are paid to fight. Justify to much abused shareholder handing more of their rapidly diminishing capital to a pack of wreckers of fights? Justify, keeping a pack of arrogant, unprincipled cowards in the lifestyle they believe is theirs by divine right?

The Directors have a real problem, they are presiding over the destruction of the companies they are entrusted to run and funding clunker tanks who are helping governments destroy companies. Of course, the Directors would have to realise defence of their companies requires solid defence of free markets, and activism to match it. The CIS and IPAhave not defended free markets. It is well they are cowards and not actavists because they would only discredit a solid fight in the eyes of many more voters - and the 2007 election was enough punishment for such defection.

A word to Ess

From your comment, it’s clear you don’t know my friend Strider. But otherwise, thankyou for the cheers. Ah, it is not supporting Mr.Jackson; it is simply that one attends to his output.

What one is doing, is drawing attention to Jackson for the very reason the commentariat, CISand IPA are appallingly bad. I correspond with fine economists overseas but it is important to refer to Jackson. He is learned, unlike say Professor Sinclair Davidson. His reasoning as a theoretician is impeccable. His analysis of affairs deadly accurate. He also does what the CIS and IPA and the media commentariat never do:

Besides his work in economics, he writes for Australians, and in it nails what has to be nailed swiftly. With it, it is clear, his is an effort to engage the public. There-in is the telling point, those overseas cannot fight battles in Australia, they have to fight battles in their own countries. Jackson and Shostak are the only two genuinely fine economists I’m aware of doing work that must be done in Australia.

Jackson discusses and debates what should be attacked openly and in public fought, but the media and the a-nueral “Right” have shut debate down. Thus, it is why on the “Right” in the media, there are only the likes of Alan Wood, Terry McCrann, Andrew Bolt, Janet Albrechtsen and Tim Blair: they are wrecking grave matters, and it boils down to ignorance and arrogance. That is all there is in the media. This rotten state of affairs cannot be blamed on the diseased Leftists in the media. It’s the necrotic, incompetent, ignorant Right that has shut debate down in the media. Look at the upshot:

We have not only ended up with the Rudd Fascist Cabinet out to destroy Australians. The truly scary thing is we’ve ended up with Liberal Parliamentary Parties (States’ and Federal) that are no damned better.

Unchallenged by a feeble “Rightwing” commentariat, these lounge lizards continue in their preferred “right way” to ruin Australians. All this in the name of Liberalism! This is supposed to be a Liberal Opposition fighting their way back onto the Treasury benches! It’s not scary, it is terrifying; first Rudd, next this lot. To check, as an example, the bozos in Canberra are supporting measures that will destroy capital and thus immiserate Australians.

Funnier still, the Nazi Greens Party is emerging as a major Party. The Liberal Party is being reduced to the point it faces being wiped out altogether in certainly the Senate, and to a tiny rump in the Victorian Parliament. The clowns in the nepotistic “Right” never took the danger the Greens Nazi Party and their other fronts such as PETA seriously. They considered these diseased Leftists as a merel pack of crazies and villages that are a political one day only.

I always took the threat the Nazi Greens Party posed seriously. If you’ve read Jackson over the years, you will appreciate he has too. Well, who was right? Though, if I’m wrong, and Jackson is wrong, it’s a tad tricky explaining all the victories they have been handed, by the camotose “Right” and watermelon heroes such as David Kemp, Ian Campbell, Malcolm Turnbull, Ian Macfarlane and that gibbering idiot Reg Hunt. How is the increase in their Parliamentary numbers to be explained - a vote counting error? Polling officers have been bribed in each election?

That is the upshot Ess. That is how much damage has been caused. The result, great dangers have been unleashed and all that the pustular “Right” can do is scream when a few truths are spelt out. What else can be expected of venal, myopic, blundering stupid types. It’s all about them - “Sod Australians, we want moolah from donors,taxpayers, and Murdoch, and careerahs and power”. It’s the ever present perpendicular “I” that always shines out with this lot of boobies.

It might as well be a Liberal Party News headline.

The carbon tax on car emissions alluded to in, Liberal Party News: Liberal Party sells out Australians (24/9/08), is diktat to car manufacturers. They are to rebuild cars to capricious dictated Co2 emissions levels.This has been imposed on makers in Europe. It is strangling them. It is a capital destroying Co2 tax. This is not all, the Liberal Opposition is an enthusiastic supporter of another capital destroying C02 tax called:

OFFSHORE PETROLEUM AMENDMENT (GREENHOUSE GAS STORAGE) BILL 2008

And cognate bills. As their speeches disclose to each of the above C02 taxes, they are totally deaf, dumb and blind as to what they are.

Ian Macfarlane is somewhat clear on what ‘cap and trade’ will do to coal based energy firms -

“thousands upon thousands of workers in Australia will simply lose their jobs. They will lose their jobs because the coal industry will not have a future under that government’s flawed carbon trading legislation.”

He is still, though, in a muddle. Has it occurred to him that whatever an ‘unflawed’ plot might be, it will still wipe out energy firms? Funnily enough, it is what Turnbull declared recently:

Macfarlane has swallowed the Green’s lie:

“Greenhouse gas emissions is probably one of the most complex areas that the government and opposition are going to have to deal with… There are a whole range of reasons why that should happen, but the single biggest reason is that we must lower greenhouse gas emissions….

“There are those who are opposed to this legislation per se. It is going to be an interesting time in the Senate for the minister responsible for this legislation, as the Greens oppose this legislation out of hand. They are making wildly erroneous and inflammatory claims that CO2 cannot be stored safely underground….Companies that are operating brown coal power stations in the Latrobe Valley will seek the opportunity to store gas in that area.”

His objection is the Rudd plan is flawed, but if it is the right plan, it is ok:

“We need to get this right, and we pledge our support to a consultative process.”

Why didn’t Macfarlane pledge to the Liberal Party and decent modest Australian to eviscerate the Rudd Cabinet and, at that, also the watermelon reds in the Coalition, including Turnbull? Instead, he see nothing wrong with capital destroying taxes, so long as they are the right ones.

What could possibly be the right way? Oh, I know, when it’s a Coalition Cabinet destroying Australians through Co2 taxation. Ian Macfarlane is Shadow Minister for Energy and Resources and leads the Liberal Party position on the above carbon taxes. Another totally incompetent Shadow minister.

Complementing the bogus economics is the bogus science of:

Co2 emissions causes climate change.

So-called climate modelling eliminates physics, and this is what the IPCC models and those of other boosters do. Not even brief weather can be modelled. Models are bought from toy shops or the skilled can make their own model planes, ships and trains from scratch and insert model working engines in them. So, in contrast to the boosters of voodoo this as an example, a reading list on Solar Influence that includes -

“Bond, Gerard, Bernd Kromer, Juerg Beer, Raimund Muscheler,
Michael N. Evans, William Showers, Sharon Hoffmann, Rusty Lotti-Bond, Irka Hajdas, Georges Bonani, 2001, Persistent Solar Influence on North Atlantic Climate During the Holocene: Science, Vol. 294, Issue 5549, 2130-2136, December 7, 2001 (Originally published in Science Express as 10.1126/science.1065680 on November 15, 2001)

“Demonstrates 18,000 years of complete solar control of climate fluctuations as measured by ice advances and retreats in northern hemisphere. Supplemental data on Internet version provides graph of solar variability for 20th Century. Data based on Carbon 14 and Beryllium 10 isotopes and ice rafting events.”

(cf. a Warwick Hughes site here, and frontpage here.)

It’s a funny coincidence but as Louis Hissink wrote:

“…coal and oil… if these two substances are actually continually being formed at the lower crust and continually depositing hydrocarbons or collecting in… in the sedimentary basins, then the concept of Geosequestration of CO2 becomes one of the more loonier ideas contemplated by the Climate Changers

“The earth with its deep hot biosphere is continuously exuding CO2 and Methane, amongst many more carbon based liquids and gases, and which often erupt to the surface with explosive consequences as the general buildup of subterranean pressures is released, and now we have this ill-conceived idea of forcing CO2 back into the ground.

“…. geosequestration is much like grabbing the exhaust gases of an automobile and then pumping them back up its exhaust pipe in the hope that overall the CO2 production from its exhaust is stabilised. The gases are not going to stay there because over time the slow buildup from the mantle will release the sequestered CO2 back into the atmosphere. Rather violently one suspects.”

Then there is the elementary scientific point, Co2 is not a poison. It’s the essential ingredient for all plants, animals and man to exist. Oh, and carbon in its gas phase (Co2) is a miniscule trace the atmosphere that cannot form as the crazies claim, an earth heating blanket. Neither doe carbon molecules remain in the atmosphere. It dissolves in water right from the gas phhse of water, and is washed to earth to do the tremendous work carbon does.

What is to be made of Liberal Party MsP:

- Who cannot spot the above fraudulent Bills for what they are, capital destroying carbon taxes, because they are illiterate in economics;

-Who cannot eviscerate the Greens’ lie because they have no science and are too lazy to call it up over the internet by the equivalent of truckloads;

-Who then compound all this stupidity by supporting a loony idea that destroys capital and is a ‘cave-in’ to the Nazi Green Party and Rudd and his band of demented fascists?!

The same questions can be asked of their advisers, as vividly demonstrated by Julie Bishop’s advisers this week. Adding to the stench is that they are all kept by the taxpayer and they don’t do a ruddy thing.

They are paid to advance genuine Liberal principles. They are paid to fight for genuine Liberal principles. They are paid to eviscerate the likes of Rudd, Wong, Milne, and Brown with meat cleavers. What do Australians get for their money? A pack of spineless cowards who run up the white flag each time the bastards they are supposed to shoot open their fat mouths. No, this is a mistake.

They don’t run up the white flag all the time. They join the watermelon red cheer squad for some rotten Bills (as in rather a lot in addition to what they put through when in Office). Their test is, they must be rammed down on Australians ‘the right way’.

Destruction through carbon taxation is what Tony Blair and Gordon Brown have imposed on the British. It is destroying energy firms, and other companies are following. The British are watching their incomes burned, their jobs vaporise, their savings wiped out, and the ‘brains in the Liberal Party’ are pleased to inflict the same punishment on Australians.

The commentariat

The supine in the Liberal Party are entrenched in their aversion to even a semblance of intellectual curiosity by the media.

It’s a habit of mine to engage the man in the street, to find out their concerns, and what they make of things. Then, if it arises, accordingly inject a few points such as the impact of Co2 taxation. The most frequent response is:

“But this is never raised and debated in public… Why isn’t it?”

The answer is, not only the hard Left, but the ostrich “Right” suppress debate, suppress free speech. Debate is anathema to them; this is why Professor Sinclair Davison ran away after Jackson’s demolition of his IPA paper on manufacturing (I mean to say, Davidson hasn’t even addressed: the reverse of the J curve must be true - which Jackson showed in his article).

Who is there?

Janet Albrechtson, who called for a Right wing take-over of Australia, and helped destroy the fight for free markets.

Andrew Bolt, who has botched things rather badly, from labour markets to C02 taxes. This is plain wrong:

“Let’s focus instead on this: can Rudd’s plan work? Will his emissions trading scheme slash our gases by anything close to what he wants?

There are two reasons to say that it hasn’t the slightest hope. That all Rudd will do is raise green taxes, not cut greenhouse gases.”

Bolt doesn’t see that Rudd will cut gases by destroying capital. Bolt speaks of costs, and rising prices of energy to consumers and doesn’t hit the target, which is, the real cost is the destruction of production. The rest of it, as bad as it is here, Carbon pain is priceless.

He doesn’t have a clue as to what to attack, and is not armed to attack, and he refuses to bring in those who can help him. He wings it and thus sticks another knife into the back of a fight that must be won. Making Bolt’s efforts sillier is his advocacy of the C02 tax called ethanol production.

Ethanol production is itself heavily subsidised. This alone shows it is not economic and capital is thus being consumed. The diseconomies of ethanol are worse than this. It is destroying food production. To make it even better, Parliament put through legislation to force transfer of land into forests, to be preserved for a century (!) as carbon sinks - another Co2 tax. Bolt has never defended what he supports and has never apologised for it.

The whining “Right” bang on about the nasty Leftists dominating the media, the lies they tell and their efforts at censorship. What about these great heroic Rightwing journalists, and for that matter those who are also supposed to be economic commentators? Nothing, zip, but for a constant flow of stuff ups passed as tough journalism.

The problem with this lot is: they are so incompetent and extremely feeble with it that they do not stir Liberal MsP and their advisers. There is nothing to force them to reach for the panic phone and demand they be introduced to sources who can advise them. Nothing to stir them into a bit of effort; and into a bit of fight. Nothing. The diseased Left observe this and are pleased.

The anti-Free Market Clunker Tanks

The IPA’srecord of advice is how Cabinets can strangle firms to death the right way. This sums up their performance on Co2 taxes.

Centre for Independent Studies has achieved the same. Then found itself an even jollier roll, telling stupid MsP how to wipe out Australians ‘the right way’ through Co2 taxes. (It is yet to explain it’s lobbying activities, and its conflicts of interests).

Now, while having noted Bolt’s limp attacks on Leftists over the Greens’ lies and Co2 taxes, he his strangely silent on the CIS‘ thuggery and treachery. Why, Bolt? Let’s reel off some considerations:

Michael Kroger and Peter Costell
HR Nicholls Society.

His lips are zipped tight with super bond glue, as a recent item by this brave reporter shows. In it, he enthusiastically slams Rudd, using a statement by Garnaut that leaves Rudd hanging. He did not go for the CIS’sjugular over Co2 taxes.

Again, he failed to hit what is wrong, including Garnaut’s economic modelling, which as of physics models nothing. He needs to start reading Brookesnews. Shostak swiflty disposed of economic modelling in an article on Brookesnews. Jackson neatly demolished Co2 taxation for what it is and the CIS’s false claims with it. Yet, Bolt would rather cripple a fight that must be won against dangerous measures than do that.

Bolt is in with them. He’s one of them. He’s fed his lines by them. He covers them. Ditto the CIS. For some odd reason the words gutless, unprincipled and stone dead idle occur. So, in case they mean anything, they are trotted out. Murdoch must be a charity bin. After all, Murdoch, $3,000 a week is a lot of charity to apply to a spineless ‘wait for the telephone to ring sitter’.

Tim Blair, covers the covers. They all belong to a closed group. Tim Blair sees nothing wrong with the ‘Rightwing’ duds. He sees nothing wrong with Bolt covering for duds. He sees nothing wrong with the Right’s failure to promote talent, and their suppression of talent. He sees nothing wrong with the Right blacklisting of talent. Indeed, this is why Blair was so happy to see Jackson blacklisted, he cheered for it.

These highly paid bastards, Blair, Bolt and Albrechtsen are reinforcing the slobs in Parliament and their inbred family members pretending to be advisers. These three mean that Parliamentary seat warmers remain secure in their cretinism. These jokers are doing their bit to destroy not only the Liberal Party, but bloody Australians with it. This is how hot these three bozos are. Again, the hard Left see this and are well pleased with these three clowns.

All up

Why is Rudd and his pack of sponging little dictators in Office. It’s rhetorical question only for:

Rudd and co would not be in office if it were not for the sodding bungling “Right”. We wouldn’t face being wiped out by Co2 taxes, central planning and all locked together by coercion, if it were not for a pack of cripples, who daily manage to crawl out of bed each morning only to piss on the toes of genuine Liberals and modest Australians, and then crawl off for a good all day snooze in comfy chairs.