Due to some intervening matters, we will be away next week. Postings will be resumed on Monday the 15th of March, 2010.
I apologise, readers, for any inconvenience, noting outstanding matters will be finished when we resume on the 15th. Until then, thankyou readers.
D.J.B.
Chavez is hailed as a second Fidel Castro. This is some commendation comparing Chavez to Castro and his fellow Stalinist butchers.
Chavez is trying to usurp the Constitution of Venezuela in order to impose a Marxist dictatorship. At the same time, he has been attempting to overthrow the government of Colombia, through Marxist terrorists he funds and trains. This is besides his funding and training of Muslim terrorists. He trains Muslim terrorists inside Venezuela. Then there is also his world-wide drug operation.
In 2008, there was the famous capture of a laptop, in which extensive was stored tying Chavez directly to the Marxist terrorist front in Colombia. Now there is this, courtesy of Ed Morrisey:
Spain: Chavez conspired to assassinate Uribe
Instead of tolerating this vicious Stalinist, Hugo Chavez should be on each country’s hit list. The amusing thing about this is, the hard Left Hugo Chavez fan-club in Australian, featuring the likes of Bob Brown and the Greens and “Phuc” Phillip Adams. It’s a galaxy of the hard Left. These treacherous, not Australian thugs are campaigning to allow Chavez and his drug pushing, terrorist funding Marxist gangsters open door entry into Australia.
A rather long list of “Who’s who” of the diseased is given in “Continued”. They all signed a petition demanding Chavez be granted open door access to Australia. Hmmm, one could agree on this term, he’s allowed in and he and his gang are all shot as soon as they step off the plane.
The names and their “petition”:
Silly question.
Their front page lead report is sterling cringe causing matter. They confidently declared “though the stimulus has resulted in some mild growth, because of the RBA’s interest rate rise yesterday it should be withdrawn.”
It has not, evidently, occurred to them that if the consumption fallacy were true, another economic ignoramus, Treasurer Wayne Swann, could just as confidently say the Fin Review is very much mistaken. Put it this way, Greece should not be on the brink of collapse; they should be vibrant and becoming even wealthier by the year. If the fallacy were true, France, Germany and Britain shouldn’t be fast approaching what the Greeks now face. In fact -
Forget Europe. Forget Swann and Kevin Rudd. Under States’ Cabinets, all Australians should be doing spiffing well. Who can omit Uber Economist of the World, Peter Costello? How Costello increased Government’s consumption and managed to record a surplus is swiflty explained below (1). Darn, there’s his rival for the Mr. Universe Award, Paul Keating, even the poorest Australian should be a millionaire.
Why, all this ’stimulus”, a man has “gotta” know all Australians must be mega-billionaires. So, why are so many destitute, or facing the high life sleeping under park benches?
It has not occurred to the Financial Review, obviously, the so-called “stimulus” actually erodes capital, arresting what is really needed, its accumulation. They failed to spot the glaring obvious, and let’s step this through:
Inflation, that is monetary expansion by central banks, besides constituting tremendous wealth confiscation and transferring it into the hands of the lucky few, including Treasurers, creates the impression real savings are higher than they are. This dissembling is due to what inflation does, distorts the price signal of interest rates. (2)
There are real market rates of interest rates. Economic laws are real, they can only be ignored at great peril and cannot be defied forever. It has not occurred to the Financial Review that savings may be far, far lower than appears to be the case. Indeed, when Jackson pointed out that an over-valued dollar could be hollowing out Australia’s production structure, in his article showing Professor Sinclair Davidson had got things very wrong on manufacturing, I sat their stunned and transfixed:
Is monetary policy destroying the country’s manufacturing base?
This leaves the possibility the RBA’s rate raise still leaves rates below real market rates and, chillingly, very likely far below. This entails the implication, even though it is a rate rise, the RBA’s rate is still inflationary. To illuminate:
In December last year, Neil Mitchell attacked the head of Westpac, Mr. Peter Hanlon, on radio station 3 AW, over Westpac’s announcement it was raising interest rates independently of the RBA. Neil Mitchell accused Westpac of, to use the pejorative, profiteering, which is funny.
All those whining about profiteering of course themselves seek to profit. Scratch hard leftists, a Tim Costello or a Clive Hamilton and you find a profiteer but these types don’t earn their profits, unlike modest Australians grinding away in production. But I digress.
Mr. Hanlon defended Westpac’s position live on 3 AW in a tense exchange with Neil Mitchell. Hanlon made a singular error. Mitchell re-stated his accusation and Hanlon entered a long explanation, though true, including cost of funds (Westpac’s explanation is here), instead of nailing the falsehood in Mitchell’s accusation. Mind, he nearly did when he stated:
‘There is a great shortage in savings and rates have to be raised to build capital finds. The bank has to do this so modest Australians will do this.’
Just consider this statement alone. This is a banker who stated savings are far lower than assumed and this can only be corrected by rapid accumulation of funds. He did not use the expression, ‘capital funds’, but it is the problem they are struggling with. We know they are struggling with it through other evidence, the sheer number of firms trying to raise them.
Neil Mitchell accidentally drew one correct conclusion. It entails a shift from consumption to savings. Neil Mitchell drew the erroneous conclusion, this hurts consumers. Oh, it does. The pain is real, higher rates on housing loans for instance. This is short term pain. But it is false in the long run because only savings raises living standards. But this misses the real pain:
Malinvestments induced by inflation are being wiped out, on top of strangulation of firms by regulation and taxes and if all this is not enough, further eroded by “stimulus spending”. All will be wiped out with carbon taxes and related measures. Joy in the morning.
Anyway, what Mr. Hanlon should have said to Mr. Neil Mitchell is this:
“Mr. Mitchell, you are calling modest Australians, many whom don’t earn what I earn, nor what you are paid, venal “profiteers” because they rightly expect to earn market rates in return for building savings.
“What you are telling me is this: I should cheat our customers out of their just returns to subsidise the consumption of others.
“To cap it all off, Mr. Mitchell, you are telling me I should impoverish Australians by ensuring the only thing that raises living standards cannot occur, capital accumulation.”
To finish Mitchell off, he need only have added:
“Look Mr. Mitchell, I’m not responsible for this indeed very nasty situation. I do, though, have to correct you severely because you clearly do not understand the matter, and misconceptions are very damaging. Errors means causes won’t be rectified and this has even greater serious force.
“I acknowledge your genuine concern we all share but you are in grave error on the reason for the concern. It is very damaging to mislead Australians on these serious affairs. It’s wrong for anyone in the media to do this and, and, frankly, I’m appalled at the rubbish poured out by what are supposed to be expert commentators in the media.
“I wish everyone was far, far wealthier than they are. It’s due to the RBA and its criminal monetary policies that they are not. They should be hauled over the coals. In the meant-time, let’s tell listeners what you have stated:
“They, modest Asutralians, some of whom happen to be our customers, are vicious because they expect just compensation for building savings which is now urgently needed and the situation is dire.
“You have told Australians, as the head of Westpac I should make it policy to cheat modest Australians. This is offensive. I would be ashamed to even contemplate it. It would never occur to me to do this to mums and dads and youngsters, to anyone.”
If Hanlon had said that, Mitchell would have crumbled and properly, humbly, apologised and, to be sure, Mitchell does do this when he blunders. Unfortunately, with the likes of the Financial Review and the rest of the media commentariat, and the likes of the Institute for Public Affairs, Mitchell has no reason to realise he was nastily wrong.
Unfortunately, bankers don’t have the advisers they need because they have bloody keynesians as their ‘economics experts’ instead. Indeed Westpac’s postion and Hanlon’s reply was framed on the consumption fallacy. Yet, even the reduction absurdum of the fallacy has not even registered inside their skulls, ‘we save in order to spend our way into… what?’
Talk about suicidal, it was suicide committed long ago using keynesians.
“Stimulus”, bah! This is what a stimulus is:
A three year old attaches one end of a wire to the exposed muscle of a dead frog, the other end to a battery, and watches it twitch.
The protean scientist is sound, not the ‘adults’. What separates the Fin Review from the other rags? Price. Being far more expensive than the others, it must be really serious. Which is why I stopped buying it a few weeks after I first bought it back in the early 1980’s. It has maintained its standards ever since. You can tell:
It also promotes the lie of human emissions causes global warming, carbon taxation is necessary, “alternative energy” scams and “government spending sprees are “sound investments:” This is a newspaper for investors and entrepreneurs? They can cut the price by simply producing a 5 page rag -
P.1 The Dick and Dora headline - “look, Jane, see Dick run.” Pp.2-5, The list of yesterday’s stock market results.
It’s hot stuff.
Damned hot. I’m going back into business. I’m going to slay the Fin Review with the 5 page elite bumper newspaper at five cents a copy - Bargain!
I shouldn’t do this – I’m ruddy well not about killing my fledgling newspaper empire but, here’s an antidote to the Fin Review, and the rest of the media:
The US recession and the myth of 1937
Why the US economy could suffer another contraction
Does it make sense to resurrect the Glass-Steagall Act?
The US economy: Why the surge in GDP does not herald a recovery
Footnotes
(1) Peter Costello’s famous surplus
peter Costello increased in real terms Government consumption by a large factor in each of his budgets. According to keynesianism, Australia should be No.1 prosperity land. We should all be so wealthy that, why, all should be luxuriating in the Bahamas.
He could do it and record ’surpluses’ because of monetary expansion. This finally does raise nominal prices, which results in real rises in tax revenues to Treasury, because most taxes are indexed. So long as his increases in Cabinet’s consumption plans were less than the stealth increases in tax, he could record surpluses. So, readers, you can see the problem with a house of a cards.
Costello, Malcolm Turnbull and the rest of the “Opposition” attacked Swann for what the RBA caused, recession. Secondly, the danger of deficit (before the impact of debt-driven spending of Rudd and Swann).
The man was as all Treasurers are, no more than a book-keeper. A bally clerk, who affixed his moniker to budget papers handed him by Treasury. This makes him the Greatest Economist of the Entire Universe! Careful, Peter, the other claimant, Keating, knows how to bury snivellers.
If he was as brainy as some believe he is, he would have taken on the likes fo Mr. Jackson and Dr. Shostak and confronted the heads of the RBA head on, publicly, and driven for the only cure, a return to sound money. Instead, he sat there, sometimes he stood, with that smug grin on his face and poured out more destructive bilge.
(2) Interest Rates
Interest rates are not ‘prices of money’. The price of sound money is given in its basis, a commodity such as gold. A valued good exchangeable for other goods, its properties rendering it suitable for use as money. Real money is generated out of production. It has been interesting to observe those shifting into not only gold but also oil as a defence against debasment of money by central banks.
Interest rates, as Jackson carefully explained in, The nature of interest rates and why it’s dangerous to manipulate them, are the prices of time, given in preferences for present goods and savings. Böhm-Bawerk killed false explanations of interest and founded the theory of interest - the time preference of theory.
“Keynes just could not grasp that interest exists because people value present goods more than future goods (time preference). And so interest determines the supply of and demand for capital goods.”
The rate of interest is established by:
“… the marginal efficiency of capital [expected rate of return] is the rate of interest. This is the natural rate of interest and a price on the time market.”
The rate of interest not only equates supply of capital with demand for it. It is a process that occurs with time, capital goods are allocated over time. Keynes’ account of interest and money totally debases both, reducing them to mere “monetary phenomenon” of “supply and demand for money”.
Credit expansion distorts the natural market rate of interest signal informing entrepreneurs in establishing capital allocation priorities, based on the marginal productivity of capital. Every entrepreneur in planning capital allocation, while not working from economic theory, does exactly this through financial analysis.
Thus, to make explicit, interest rates balances production and consumption with time.
Alcoa announced its renewed its energy supply contract with coal based energy Loy Yang Power. This, naturally, upset the hard Left. The Age, aka “The Spring Street Soviet”, is in horrified shock, as the tone of its report shows. The hard Left’s green fronts foamed at the mouth, in particular, Environment Victoria”. Before writing this item up, in addition to several mountain ranges of material in my discs, I needed to to find out a couple things.
A couple of things, ha! It took all ruddy day in a very interesting hunt and checking with sources that has turned up much else besides. So, what we have to do is split them up into separate posts, thanks to what I have been uncovering - and I’m several months behind unloading material as it is. Below are articles rarther germane to what we have to relate. Right, let’s begin unloading with this first post on another right disaster sapping Alcoa, Victorians and Australians.
Oh, the back-log; amongst very many other reasons such as incompetence, feeblesnees, cowardice and wrecking thoroughly sound causes and so forth, another damned good reason why the Clique and their clunker tanks the Centre of Independent Studies, HR Nicholls Society, Quadrant Magazine, Ray Evans’ Online Opinion, and Institute for Public Affairs are contemptible is their undiluted idleness. All their ‘effort’ is in begging for $millions poured into these bastards each year over decades. They are so bloody idle they have never done even what I have done in three days; you can tell; there is nothing in the piles of pulp they crank out. So, Heavens knows the frustrations of the editor of Brookesnews and any other genuine freedom fighter “marginalised” by the clique.
I’s not money I’m talking about. I’m talking about honest hard work, which is foreign to the Clique and their clunker tanks. Funds are needed for materials, not for paying a wealthy man’s version of the dole, which is a real insult to all those thrown out of jobs due to rubbish purveyed as “economic policies”. Well, the Clique do have something in common with the cadres of the hard Left and their fronts. The cadres of the Hard Left are all for the “revolution” as long as, they believe, they are rich slave masters of everyone else. The Clique holds modes Australians in contempt.
Let’s put this in perspective, the modest Australian. These are guys who slog their guts out building roads in local councils. I have never told a “Council worker” joke for over a decade now and never will. Then there are the guys slogging away on production lines.
Also, guys who happen to be entrepreneurs and their backers, which happen to include tens of millions of Australians slogging it out serving Australians in the grind of production.Very many of these guys, not many haven’t, commenced in the sloppiest, back-breaking jobs. This is as foreign to the Clique as it is to the hard Left.
Believe me, many real entrepreneurs, including heads of majors, know what back-breaking work means. They also know most employed in firms they are charged to run, right down to the cleaners. They screw their backsides down to drive production to serve customers and thus serve shareholders because this is the only way to succeed, serving even those whom a chap detests. These guys respect the little guys they are the boss of, this is the absolute truth.
I know all this because I have done it myself. Best of all, it is why I enjoy chats with many entreprenuers here in Australia and overseas on even these very humble things and not the “big (t)issues” the Clique (not only the hard Left) pretend to know and “gas-bag” on about.
Only entrepreneurs and good people under them and behind them and not parasites know this. All this puts the like of the CIS, Greg Lindsay Professor Sinclair Davidson, IPA, Ray Evans, Des Moore, Chris Berg, HR Nicholls Society, Michael Kroger, Peter Costello and Quadrant magazine in their damned place. These mediocrities do not know what work is.They don’t know what capital is They don’t know a damned thing they pretend to write on. It is amusing to note that they have not served Australians under arms either and, to be sure, they treat the men of the Armed Forces of Australia with the same nasty contempt they have for all modest Australians (and we have another item on this in the wind).
I’ll say this: It’s time for certain heads, including Alcoa’s, to bloody well face up to what they are bloody well paid to do. It isn’t to crawl to little thugs like Rudd and Brumby. Neither is it to grovel before the likes of Clive Hamilton, Sharan Burrow, Wakeham, Greg Hunt, Malcolm Turnbull, and Tony Abbott.
To reflect, neither should they have massaged other blood-suckers such as John Brumby, Jeff Kennett, Alan Stockdale, Bob Hawke and Paul Keating. In fact, it is not the job of any head of a firm to grovel to anyone but to customers. Their job is to serve people. Enterprise, from the highest to lowest stages of production is all about serving others. So, what in the blazes is Alcoa doing running to the likes of Rudd, then Brumby, the IPA and other little lying bastards who serve no-one but themselves.
To the heads of Alcoa, this is your first big mistake: saddling your firm with useless, ignorant parasites called PR Managers. I mean to say, Hugh Morgan was an object lesson. Once, surely, was enough. The next big mistake was to sell out to enjoy subsidies.
On these mistakes the rest follows, as we shall see. The trouble is, because of your gutlessness, your cowardice, your unprincipled hope of being secured, you have sold out Australians and Australia. Now you can crawl to modest shareholders and explain to them why Alcoa must be wiped out via carbon taxes. Brilliant. Bloody brilliant.
Jesus H Christ. Your biggest mistake was not why I am writing this. Your biggest mistake was selling out principles and then whining about being clobbered by the very twerps guaranteed to destroy Alcoa and through what you are screaming about now: the risk cheap energy supply will be destroyed.
Shareholders should haul you over the coals. This monstrosity can be fought but, as we shall see, Alcoa told Rudd they are happy for carbon taxes to be rammed down on everyone else, as long as they are protected.
Now, I have to get this straight and I’d like the genius in Alcoa to explain this, for a good man likes to have his facts straightened out, but who is the brain dead “chieftain” who came up with the notion Alcoa can survive carbon taxes and all else that is entailed if their little mate in Spring Street, John Brumby, protects them?
How bad is this? Well Brumby distanced himself this morning faster than streaked lightening – “Nothing to do with me. I’m only a retarded brat who by some mysterious stroke of fortune happens to be Premier of Victoria. I’m a lucky boy,. My playmate is the er, ah, um Leadah of dah Opposition. Don’t know a thing about it.”.
The Clique and the Left have too many things in common and this is a big thing in common, in Victoria:
Vic Crime Inc, set up by the IPA and two of their heroes, boof-head Kennett pretending to be Saint Merciful and his faithful Kemasabe, Alan Stockdale.
They all put the Mafia to shame. No, they would all make even the Mafia cringe.
Alan Stockdale, Macquarrie Bank’s head of taking taxpayers’ money courtesy of politicians and throwing it down the drain, euphemisically called “infrastructure”. Summed up, it is:
Politicians and bureaucrats enjoying a right old spending spree and then charging smelly oafs all over again and then diddling them for the umpteenth time via “alternative energy” scams, calling the sum total swill “investments”.
Yes, Sir, the Clique and the Left, they have their priorities right: Help themselves and then run for cover fast, hoping smelly smelly oafs aka Australians won’t notice a damned thing about them. Oafs endure stench only for so long and then they hose the shit out.
Why the US economy could suffer another contraction
Does it make sense to resurrect the Glass-Steagall Act?
The US recession and the myth of 1937
Carbon taxes energy production and technology: more green nonsense
[Gad, we’re lucky the Copenhagen Treaty that Kevin Rudd was going to sign fell apart.]
The European Commission has just announced an agreement whereby English will be the official language of the European Union rather than German, which was the other possibility.
As part of the negotiations, the British Government conceded that English spelling had some room for improvement and has accepted a 5- year phase-in plan that would become known as “Euro-English”.
In the first year, “s” will replace the soft “c”. Sertainly, this will make the sivil servants jump with joy. The hard “c” will be dropped in favour of “k”. This should klear up konfusion, and keyboards kan have one less letter.
There will be growing publik enthusiasm in the sekond year when the troublesome “ph” will be replaced with “f”. This will make words like fotograf 20% shorter.
In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted to reach the stage where more komplikated changes are possible.
Governments will enkourage the removal of double letters which have always ben a deterent to akurate speling.
Also, al wil agre that the horibl mes of the silent “e” in the languag is disgrasful and it should go away.
By the 4th yer people wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing “th” with “z” and “w” with “v”.
During ze fifz yer, ze unesesary “o” kan be dropd from vords kontaining “ou” and after ziz fifz yer, ve vil hav a reil sensibl riten styl.
Zer vil be no mor trubl or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi TU understand ech oza. Ze drem of a united urop vil finali kum tru.
Und efter ze fifz yer, ve vil al be speking German like zey vunted in ze forst plas.
[ Ich habe gerade die ursprünglichen Manuskripte von Williams Shakespeares komplettem oeuvre aufgedeckt. Ja, Es tut mir leid, dass zu sagen, war er ein deutscher Agent schließlich.
Außerdem, “Zu sein oder nicht zu sein” war Spitzenstille-Stille-Code für den von Schlieffen Plan.
Trans: I have just uncovered the original manuscripts of Billy Shakespeare’s entire oeuvre. Yes, I am sorry to say, he was a German agent after all.
More-over, “To be or not to be” was top hush hush code for the von Schlieffen Plan”.]
Not unfortunately, say, the Victorian EPA. It’s the U.S. Federal EPA. However, the court cases being mounted on very serious charges do have wide international implications for all involved, including those in Australia. For it is international in scale. Monash University’s reputation, for one, will be at the least shredded, in view of its involvement in the perpetration of the lie of human carbon emissions causes global warming, and advocacy of economic destruction through alternative energy scams and carbon taxation. See, for example,
“Hottest January ever” say climate experts, establishing a new comedy genre
Where will this leave CSIRO? In the same sunk boat, that’s where.
What will it take for the same sort of actions to be taken in Australia? When it is too late? After politicians and Kommissars, Federal and States’ and Local Councils’, have succeeded in wiping out Australians with carbon taxes, related measures and other vicious ‘green’ policies?
By the way, during the weekend it was reported on radio a “VCAT Judge” squished a planned development on Victoria’s coast because of the lie. The “Judge” asserted the coast will be inundated and they must stop Victorians building there. Consider what this really means. The “Judge” might look up the word dictator and consider what a nasty little jackbooted dictator is. A hint, use the mirror, use the mirror. VCAT is nothing more than the enforcer of decrees rammed down by politicians and must be shut down.
The actions launched against U.S. agencies and individuals and their fraud and “ponzi” schemes need to be reduplicated in Australia. This has force for not only Government ‘departments of environment’. The CSIRO is caught red-handed. The item on CSIRO will be finished this week.
Monash University has also abused taxpayers over the best part of a decade now by not simply throwing funds into ‘research programs’ that assume the twinned lies. It also actively supports the Government progroms. Monash also needs to refresh themselves on what intellectual fraud and charlatanism are, and what aeroplane scams are.
Put it another way. Is Monash University seriously asserting engineers, physicists and economists of the University will defend all this out in the open, in robust debate? It is now going to be treated to a really fun time.
Then there are Ministers, Federal and States, who are responsible for the Kommissars infesting departments, institutes and agencies. Sources have related strong rumours of intimidation of any who do not obey the progrom, and any who have the nerve to dare say it is false. By this, I also mean scientists are also intimidated. This itself requires investigations of the type the perpetrators fear.
It is disgusting, unspeakably despicable that three former Federal Ministers in the name of the Liberal Party are also guilty of this as responisbhle Ministers. They too should be made to account for their actions on the wrong end of investigation and actions that follow: David Kemp, Ian Campbell and Malcolm Turnbull.
There is also intimidation of Liberal Party members, through none other than Malcolm Turnbull-Tony Abbott Shadow Minister of the “Environment”, Greg Hunt. This alone is very good reason for the expulsion of Greg Hunt from the Liberal Party and also those responsible for this adolescent hard Left buffoon, and they include not only the likes of Turnbull. Michael Kroger Kronies slung this parasite into a precious Liberal party seat because he is just like them.
We disclosed in,
Liberal Party: Scoop! Greg Hunt’s Order to Party Members
The details of Greg Hunt using “edicts” and threats to suppress scientific evidence showing carbon emissions causes climate change is a lie and of economic evidence showing carbon taxes means economic destruction, the complete ruination of Australians and Australians. That he was using force inside the Party to ensure even the hint of any debate on these matters is suppressed. Since he is Shadow Minister, the inference is crystal clear, it is the action of thugs inside the Liberal Party, who are also responsible for the wrecking of the Liberal Party. A few weeks ago, Tony Abbot declared:
There is no suppression of members, speech and debate inside the Liberal Party. This is a falsehood. The Clique and their “think tanks” the Institute for Public Affairs, the Centre for Independent Studies and the HR Nicholls Society is responsible for this shocking state of affairs inside the Party.
Carbon credits and ‘alternative energy’ scams, they are what can be termed ‘aeroplane’ schemes. In Australia, “aeroplane” schemes have been declared criminal schemes under statute, regulations rammed down by the politicians of both major parties. What a black irony this is, politicians perpetrating them in violation of their very own ‘laws’. Well, Bernie Madoff knows all about “ponzis” and what follows.
Actions being launched in the US include the charge of racketeering, under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act of 1970, unifying the germane Acts of 1961-1968, all raised to fight major crime syndicates, principally the Mafia. How amusing. The Mafia only aims to milk firms and not destroy them. However, it was realised the Act is an instrument any individual can use so long as their case satisfies the judicial tests for such an action. Guess what?
Al Gore is a goner. He will face soon enough a tough barrister who is going to kick his backside all the way into penitentiary. For Gore, besides lying to the public over climate change, besides his involvement with Bill Clinton in selling top US military secrets to the Communist regime of China in return for funding the Democrat Party, has made a tremendous fortune out of governments “funding” carbon reduction scams.
The importance of the cases being launched in the US, besides those being launched against the fraudsters at East Anglia University, is precisely the international depth. Mann, by the way, the perpetrator of the ‘Hockey Stick’ fraud, on which the IPCC based its lies, is one charlatan in a very long list of scammers who is to be prosecuted. Someone should point all this out to CSIRO and Monash University.
This is going to be very interesting indeed.
In, Beating the Climategate Cover Up: the next legal step, John O’Sullivan traces out the application of the RICO Act and against some of the many who will be charged under the Act. Some telling quotes from this article:
“Senator Jim Inhofe (R-OK) has stated the need for an international criminal investigation into what he called, “unethical and potentially illegal behavior by some the world’s leading climate scientists.”
“Inhofe emphasized the significant finding of the British Government that data destruction at the CRU was criminal.”
“As Stuart P. Green of Rutgers Law School, Newark tells…
‘As a result, the person has been prosecuted for obstruction of justice, perjury, false statements, or other similar ‘cover-up’ crime. In some of the cases, such charges have accompanied charges for the underlying crime; in others, they have displaced them.’
“Pertinently, even though Professor Jones is a British climatologist employed at a UK university, he made this admission in the leaked CRU emails:
“I’m hoping that no-one there realizes I have a US DoE grant and have had this (with Tom W.) for the last 25 years.” [1120676865.txt ]”
“Thus Jones remains liable to extradition and may conceivably be convicted under both UK and US jurisdictions.”
World’s biggest coal company brings U.S. government to court in climate fraud
“The petition must be answered and covers the entire body of leaked emails from ‘Climategate’ as well as those other ‘gate’ revelations including the frauds allegedly perpetrated under such sub-headings as…”
As readers can see, these are very serious actions. They will see CSIRO and Monash University, their names certainly, hauled through courts. This is a given because of their links to the IPCC. CSIRO boasts of its capacity as adviser to the IPCC. Well, they can be disturbed, noting by the way that Dr. Rajendra Pachauri of the IPCC is subject to on a range of matters involving fraud.Whether both institutions will be able to recover from this is an interesting matter of speculation around the City.
The heads of both institutions have made their bed of mud and slime and will find out that they will be made to lie in their own mud. They won’t be able to escape what is now being launched. They, evidently, did not consider the price of their own stupidity.
Fraud is international fraud and both are internationally tied to it. Only the thick cannot see these institutions are about to subjected to the right sort of treatment at the hands out to see justice done in the course of very serious court actions in the US and UK. Let’s spell it out for them, it is going to blow up in their face.
They made this bomb and attached it securely to themselves, no-one else did. So they can’t run screaming to good old real taxpayer, whom they have abused and betrayed in these matters, and scream for protection in these very serious matters. Those who believe they are entitled to destroy Australians through carbon taxes, alternative energy scams and bunk purveyed as science and economics cannot be given any protection what-so-ever.Those in institutions ostensibly dedicated to the advance of truth have no excuse for their actions in these matters of tremendous force.
Oh, and where does this leave Greg Lindsay and his Centre for Independent Studies? Right down the same tube. Fraud is fraud, and scams are scams. Lindsay and his CIS sunk themselves by deciding to campaign for them. Gone, and good riddance.
There is an upside to “The chances”, the enemy gets it all at once.
After months of hard slog, a Recce Troop captures a Taliban leader in Afghanistan, takes him to a warehouse. They read him his “rights” - dice.
The Sergeant says, ”Roll the dice and if you get a 1 2 3 4 or 5 your head comes off.”
The Taliban leader says ”What if I throw a 6?”
The Sergeant says, “You get to throw again.”
This is the way to interrogate Islamo enemy and read them their “rights”. They understand this. Their “supporters” also understand this.
It is why they, the villagers and townsmen in Afghanistan, are disillusioned by Mohammad’s great ‘leadership’. Reality is dawning. If this is glorious Jihadic conquest, what in the Hell is Goddy on about blasting his devotees to smithereens and, come to that, making life hell for the little guy courtesy of his enforcers. And, they are bothered about what is done to them by their “brothers”. This, before mentioning that Muslim shit-hole paradise, Iran. All self-inflicted death, no glory tends to do that.
This is another message to the “religion of peace”, courtesy of patriotic Australians and our allies delivering messages of solace attached to lead carrier pigeons fired through tubes carried by bird fanciers dressed in “eco-friendly” camouflage gardening dress.
As a keen gardener, my best friend is Mr. Roundup.
On Friday and Saturday, I had interesting conversations with some manufacturers. Those still surviving that is. Despite what Rudd, Swann, and the media commentariat say, these guys - entrepreneurs are in no doubt Australia is deep in recession. They are in capital goods and consumer goods production. It’s a miracle any production of capital goods survives in Australia because:
Even before recession, caused by what inflation is - central banks’ expansion of money (try this at home and see what happens to you), the truth is manufacturing has been pounded into the ground with regulation and taxes.
The gentlemen I spoke to are more than worried. This time of the year for the firms they run happens to be their major funds build up and planning period. They are watching their builds being diced. I cracked to some of them: “Well, if carbon taxes are rammed down no-one need bother turning up because there won’t be anything to front up to, but we’ll be too bloody busy trying to survive on nothing.”
Amid the wry smiles the following could be heard: “F…… politicians… bureaucrats. Bastards.”
On politicians, they didn’t distinguish between the Left and the “Right”.
Peter Costello, Nobel Prize wining Jurist and Economist and the likes of the Institute for Public Affairs, Centre for Independent Studies, HR Nicholls Society and Quadrant magazine are culpable for what is a devastating disaster. The hard left are where they are today and manufacturing is being eradicated because the Clique, who have wrecked the Liberal Party, are:
Venal, unprincipled, economic ignoramuses busy at only one thing, ensuring they are “OK” by hoovering real taxpayers and sending begging letters to company directors to fill their bank vaults with share-holders’ funds. These guys know the meaning of principal principle.
An uncle, who was a manufacturer of capital goods, gave this sound advice: “To be an entrepreneur in Australia is penal punishment. Don’t do it.
He was dead right. The difficulty is, if none were prepared to engage in markets, there would be no Australia. It would be a land of the immiserated fighting for mere survival. Carbon taxes will do that, reduce Australians to savagery.
It bloody well is penal punishment. During much of my lifetime, I have watched firms butchered by lousy “policies”. Indeed, the whole point to schooling is to eradicate the protean entrepreneur and ensure all turn out dutiful serfs of politicians and bureaucrats. Idolaters of the “State”.
Not only the hard Left, but also the Clique holds, Australia will be truly great when all production is destroyed and smelly oafs otherwise known as Australians are made to keep their place as the serfs to them. The Clique only spelled this out in, for example, the garbage they asserted as the case for free labour markets. No, truly, this lot spot a factory and they call it a criminal offence.
Professor Sinclair Davidson is too busy trying to find out what a Laffer curve is to be bothered answering the analysis of Jackson (Brookesnews), an over-valued currency could be hollowing out manufacturing and overall the production structure of Australia. besides, along with his mates in the Clique, Professor Sinclair Davidson is also far to busy smearing Jackson than to waste his time on anything so trivial as debate on very grave economic matters. He’s a “professor”, end of debate - as far as the clique is concerned. Man, do they get upset when someone has the nerve to tell that lot the truth, they are not capable of debating anything even of ordinary merit.
This morning there was an interesting announcement. Hands up all who assumed Australian beef producers have not a comparative advantage but an absolute economic advantage?
I did. Well, now they don’t. This morning on the radio there was a brief report, beef will be imported into Australia. Beef in Australia is now internationally trade-able.
It was mentioned that this development has sparked calls for protectionism. Of course it would. Why wouldn’t it? look at the idle illiterates occupying Liberal party seats. What stood out in Professor Sinclair Davidson’s IPA article on manufacturing, with ‘co-author” Chris Berg the retarded, developmentally arrested editor of IPA Review, is he positively invited “industry policy”. In case anyone is unsure as to what is wrong with “industry policy”, it was the “economic policy” of the Soviet regime.
What is telling is, entrepreneurs are angry but they have no confidence in anyone fighting good causes. Why should they? It’s telling, because of the sheer damage the Clique and their clunker tanks has wrought that the backbone of Australia are fatalistically accepting the destruction of production. They Clique has reduced entrepreneurs to stoical acceptance of total ruination.This is the sum total of the Clique’s efforts over decades, and having enjoyed eleven years under Peter Costello the Wizard Treasure of the entire universe and Kennett and Stockdale, the Maestro builders of Vic Crime Inc.
They, manufacturers, know what carbon taxes mean, as they told me in no uncertain terms. These gentlemen will be, of course, accused by the hard Left of “profiteering at the expense of workers”. The likes of Peter Costello, Kevin Rudd, Tony Abbott and Gregg Hunt won’t, of course, blame themselves for their own thuggery. Rudd, Swann and Wong, will blame it on markets. The likes of Ray Evans, Des Moore, Professor Sinclair Davidson, Ken Phillips, Greg Lindsay, the -
Institute for Public Affairs (David Kemp and the Kemp family is the IPA)
HR Nicholls Society
Centre for Independent Studies (Greg Lindsay is the CIS)
Quadrant Magazine
Along with the likes of Peter Costello, David Kemp, Senator Nick Minchin, Michael Kroger and their backers, are all responsible for this shocking state of affairs. Bye the bye, the names Business Council of Australia and Australian Industry Group are also mud. The hilarious thing is, all these blood-suckers can’t figure out why so many in business despise them and, for light relief, laugh at them.
Don’t worry Des Moore and Ray Evans, we’ll give you more “PR” too. Jesus Christ, this pair of clowns busy smearing genuine Liberals and genuine free market economists, deserve, ceaseless media attention. We are happy to oblige them.
The hard Left love them, as numbers have told me, including ACTU heavies and journalists in The Age aka “The Spencer Street Soviet”. And they also adore lesser lights such as Chris Berg and Professor Sinclair Davidson. In fact, a long list of the Clique are the Left’s pin-ups. Never mind, nothing is more important than the Clique and their “hot goss” photo spreads.
This is Douglas of Mangled Thoughts delivering what the Clique and their pet toadies - the likes of Andrew Bolt, Tim Blair and Janet Albrechtsen have never done: tough, uncompromising journalism in the defence of freedom. Unlike these incompetent, idle, gutless “journalists”, defence of freedom means also investigating and exposing the Clique who have - not might have but have also betrayed Australians:
Not, by any stretch of the imagination, because of ideological reasons, unlike the hard Left. No, they have wrecked the Liberal Party and betrayed it and Australians for no other reason than they are contemptuous of Australians. For, they are self-promoting venal boors.
Oh, they spit on even Liberal party members, what’s left of them that is. Why, the Kroger-Costello foghorn, Andrew Bolt, himself, stated that the members of the Liberal Party are beneath contempt. Andrew Bolt also told modest Australians that they are ingrates because they do not realise they are as wealthy as he is.
This, from a $5,000 plus a week bludger who waits on the telephone to be told what he will write in his column. Readers, as related some time ago, a source who is a contractor used by the Herald Sun observed and related the inconvenient truths Bolt’s “colleagues” freely unloaded.
By that single statement, bye the bye, Andrew Bolt also discredited the otherwise thoroughly sound and thus highly moral cause of free labour markets, and convinced thousands of Victorians to vote for the likes of hard Left ACTU parasite Sharan Burrow, and Penny Wong. Then there are the likes of Greg Combet and Doug Cameron, hiding in Cowards’ Castle, who don’t have the guts to face modest union members directly out in the open and tell them to their faces that they are going to destroy them with carbon taxes. Of course they don’t and won’t. They know what ordinary members would do to them if they were to do what honesty and, crucially, Ministerial duty requires.
Australians have not seen the bottom of this recession, thanks to the Rudd Cabinet and what sits opposite pretending to be the Liberal Party. Why worry? Carbon taxes will destroy everyone anyway.
Rudd and co are, at bottom, furious because Mossad, which history is written in courage, eradicated a Muslim butcher, the enemy for Rudd’s information, using fake passports to insert their agents.
Mossad has done an excellent job in exterminating vermin bent on killing Israelis and Australians. It’s a real nuisance Australia doesn’t have a Mossad.
In case any reader considers this a Coward’s Castle type statement, no it isn’t. I’m all for doing the vermin in before they do us in. Mossad, the intelligence and counter-terrorism unit of our ally, does work that has to be done. Readers can call me a Jew.
I’m not. I do have many Jewish friends and they are patriotic Australians. These friendships have nothing to do with this stance. The problem of any fake passport is of course it can be mistaken as the ID of anyone who does not have the nerve to face up to the enemy Israel and Australians mutually share, even though the enemy will not hesitate to do to them what they have done to many others, can be easily done away with. The “Government” can help Mossad out, even call on volunteers if necessary for plausibility.
We are at war against a brutal, ideologocally driven enemy. They underatand only one thing: When they are wiped out. A hard fact of the matter is, faked passports are not a rarity. Enemies in the past used them. Current enemies also use them. It is a part of, like it or not, warfare.
Imagine a muslim cell using fake IDs of Westerners. It spells real trouble. The probability is high that there will be not one but, worse, many Westerners with the same name. There can be many very many with the same name. What does this mean?
Each time the enemy uses fake IDs, any number of Westerners are suddenly put on the international terrorist alert list, beginning with Interpol’s. I don’t have the cases ready to hand to demonstrate this, but it is what has been done by the enemy to many Westerners.
Has the media ever reported these case? No. But, because Mossad killed a hero of fifth columnists in the media, it’s different. Mossad eradicated a Muslim who was until now one of the most dangerous Muslim terrorists on earth whom the hard Left adores.
It’s not about some faked passports bearing the names of a few Australians. It’s about the fact Mossad succeeded in a very swift operation in eradicating a hero of the treacherous Left. “How dare Mossad kill someone who is a “hero” of the treacherous Left.” This is what this media driven “outrage” is all about.
Me? It’s no Coward’s Castle claim this: If an ID faked by Mossad bore some similarities to mine, I wouldn’t complain. Eradicating enemy would make the error a really enjoyable bit of sport. It would be satisfying to know an accidental bit part served a good turn of tremendous impact on the enemy.
To remind readers, I have given only sterilised accounts of what the enemy do to their victims, and it does not matter who their victims are. If I were to relate the complete details of what they enjoy doing to their victims, when they are not shooting and blowing up and sending “martyrs” to blow up others, let me assure you readers:
Not one of you will eat breakfast, lunch and dinner for a couple of months. At the end of about two months, you might be able to digest some ice-cream. So, Rudd and co can, frankly, get stuffed. Mossad exterminated a number one rodent.
They know what all Australians also face, thanks to the anti-Australian twinned policies of non-selective immigration en-masse and balkanisation euphemistically called multi-culturalism.
You know what was really saddening? The sheer number on Iranians on the Internet pleading for the allies in the first gulf war against Saddam Hussien to roll through him and straight into Tehran.
The real disgrace is the allies didn’t execute in the first gulf war what should have been done. This failure encouraged the enemy in their notion that they are destined to inflict their hell on earth to all peoples.
Islam, like socialism, is barbarism writ large. We are at war.
The hard, unvarnished truth is: The Islamo fascist regime of Tehran is our enemy. Way to go US combat pilots. All that-was missing was dropping a payload on Islamo-fascism central:
Warrior in the skies inviting enemy to oblige him
[What! The impertinence, of the Mullahs in Islam Central. They need to remind themselves: When real men take to the skies over Ian, they are only going for a joy ride in their own territory. So, the Mullahs in Tehran can mind their own bloody business or take ‘heat’.]
A pilot overheard this conversation on the VHF Guard (emergency) frequency 121.5 MHz while flying from Europe to Dubai .
The conversation…..
Iranian Air Defense Radar: ‘Unknown aircraft you are in Iranian airspace. Identify yourself.’
U.S. Aircraft: ‘This is a United States aircraft. I am in Iraqi airspace.’
Iranian Air Defense Radar: ‘You are in Iranian airspace. If you do not depart our airspace we will launch interceptor aircraft!’
U.S. Aircraft: ‘This is a United States Marine Corps FA-18 fighter. Send ‘em up. I’ll wait!’
Iranian Air Defense Radar: (no response … )
[They probably had to go to the loo.]
U.S. Warriors of the skies are ‘crash hot’
Readers, I will put up more evidence, damned good evidence, of how crash hot these guys are.
Resuming the section on Hamilton’s straw woman, Janet Albrechtsen and her smearing of Viscount Monckton and nasty little misrepresentation of what he puts, she has caused damage again, she does this naturally, with her drivel. Concentrating on this walking disaster, it is easy to identify why Hamilton invokes her as authoritative support for his mendacious, asinine whine.
She finds the statement of totalitarianism offensive. Well, the major thrust of the Copenhagen Treaty was to impose a world government, using the twinned lies as the excuse. It is expressly stated in the clauses of the “Treaty”, to which the Rudd Cabinet was to be a signatory.
Even without the “Treaty”, Rudd’s carbon taxes and related ‘economic’ measures can only be effected with coercion. How does this square with freedom and capitalism? And this is Monckton’s well substantiated point.
However, to single out and isolate the question of totalitarianism is to miss the essential point to Monckton’s attack and defence. He demonstrated dramatically the impact of carbon taxes - it destroys living standards. This, Albrechtsen conveniently passed over, while not saying boo about:
-The IPA has not grappled with it accurately, let alone forthrightly.
- The CIS has lied about it because the CIS is lobbying for carbon taxes.
We shall return to this in the next section. Noting it here, is to mark how bad her “article” is. What a nerve. She attacks Monckton and covers her pals in the IPA and CIS and so forth, who deserve a thorough public thrashing over their antics in wrecking again another cause entailing grave dangers for Australians.
Not only Monckton, but all Australians have every right to be angry and see their anger accurately brought to bear in accurate attack to secure the total defeat of the two lies and the measures that if not thoroughly and soundly defeated means ruination for Australians. But Albrechtsen states Australians should be good sheep and accept whatever abuse and worse is dealt them without so much as a bleat. This callous, fatuous, shallow, conceited ignoramus is regarded as a conservative journalist?!
The hard truth the Clique won’t face, because it is hurtful, is that they have never nailed what the force of carbon taxes is. Noting their cowardice, they do fear the hard left and how. The notion of open fighting is ‘heresy’ to this lot. It is natural that, for instance, Albrechtsen finds a robust, principal driven stand and fight a criminal offence. Combine all their ‘qualities’ and what do you get? An Albrechtsen.
Oh, and a Chis Berg too. Darn! Alright, the whole lot of them. It is telling Clive Hamilton uses her as authoritative support for his diatribe.
Indeed, Albrechtsen is noted for gutlessness too. She, for instance, as the rest of the Clique, did not stand up and eviscerate the Victorian Bracks’ Cabinet over its Blasphemy ‘law’. Not a word from the whole lot. They hid in their Cowards’ castles behind firmly bolted doors.
Indeed, one of them had the nerve to claim on this site how they fought hard. I like a joke too but this guy, one Mr. Steve Edwards, was not joking. He proved it with a banal, soporific ramble no-one had read before until he shoved it under everyone’s noses on this site.
He wrote it and it was published, a he stated, “under the auspices of the Centre of Independent Studies“. Egads! You need “auspices” to even write pulp fiction. There was no fight in it, just a spineless, hand-wringing bit of tripe about free speech is a “good idea”.
A “good idea”? How about this: It’s an inalienable right and it was stolen by politicians, and the Clique’s mates occupying precious Liberal Party seats in Spring Street supported it to the hilt and it was time to stand up in public and go for the jugulars of the bastards.
Where are you Bunny Champers? Come back! Please. You are needed. (1)
The Clique went into hiding, but there were those fighting
1) The Two Pastors standing up to the thugs enforcing this anti-freedom decree. Did the Right come out and stand up for them, while the media were also smearing the Two pastors? No, not a peep and nowhere to be seen at all. As for Steve Edwards and the CIS, he was too busy writing his monumental thesis on a “good idea” and Greg Lindsay hard at it setting the keyboard fonts for such superficial action.
2) A few hardy types openly breaking the law to show it is nothing more than a political measure aimed at eradication of free speech and the great beneficiaries of it are, why, those fun guys Muslims. Peter Faris QC, for one. Mr. Jackson of Brookesnews stood out with a stroke of inspired tactical genius.
I was really, really annoyed. I hoped to be hauled up and show what Bracks, Hulls and their Kommissars, Sisely and Szoke, really are and what that tripe called “law” really is. I tried really hard. I broke the “law” in the most determined and horrendous way I could fathom without offending public decency.
It was cheering when it looked like Jackson had damned well succeeded in getting himself hauled off to a star chamber trial. You could see from the documents he was happily manacling his wrists to save the Kommissars time. The Kommissars were handed direct the uncompromising, well documented evidence of his heinous crimes. Correspondence showed Cabinet and their Kommissars had been caught out red-handed. Putting Jackson on trial would have seen them eviscerated and thrown into the gutters where they belong.
So, Sisely and Szoke whined and wheedled on about why they could not possibly enforce the “law” they were charged by Bracks and Hulls with enforcing. How can “Judges” concur in gross, criminal violation of the “law”? It was interesting reading their attempt to get out of answering explain why the could not possibly proceed with action against Jackson. Are there shops that sell brown dresses for special occasions? (2)
The champion bantam-weight of Australia and the entire Universe, Janet Albrechtsen, in action
Did Albrechtsen come out fighting? No-one could find out where her corner was to see if she had even bothered togging up and wrapping the hands.
Did she back Jackson on this? Of course not. Defending freedom is not what Albrechtsen and the Clique are about. Anything but this. Their great cause is pushing themselves and their own interests. This is their cause.
There’s nothing in it for them defending freedom and the genuine grounds of freedom at all. Besides, it would mean anyone else but them hogging the lime-light and paparazzi photo-shoots. You never get between the likes of Hugh Morgan, Ray Evans, Des Moore and Chris Berg and a camera - if you value your life.
What Janet Albrechtsen’s smears are really about
Viscount Monckton also hurts the Clique that has succeed in cutting off alternative sources of advice to the Liberal Party. Advice the Party is in desperate need of.
The Clique, consequently, destroyed fights for thoroughly sound causes. Neither has it fought politicians, irrespective of which Party, and bureaucrats over rotten ‘economic policies’ from sound principles. Moreover, their in fact anti-free market nostrums spewed out by the Institute for Public Affairs, Centre of Independent Studies, HR Nicholls Society and Quadrant magazine are the pivot of much damage the clique has caused through States Cabinets – definitely under the Kennett-Stockdale Cabinets, and Federal Cabinets. They also find publication of hard truths hurtful, very inconvenient indeed. (Reader’s, mention “STO” in their presence and watch them run screaming for cover.)
A serious political problem for the Liberal Party
They have left the Party stranded and the likes of Tony Abbott and Greg Hunt are the upshot. No principles, no brains, nothing. But here’s the problem:
How does any party expect to succeed once the electorate holds it responsible for slashing real incomes?
In view of the Shadow Cabinet’s position, it won’t simply be the Rudd Cabinet voters will hold responsible for the impact of carbon taxes and related measures, should they be rammed down. Since the Shadow Cabinet’s disagreement is in emphases only and not in substance, voters will be after their necks too. So what does this mean for the Liberal party as such?
It will also be held responsible when in fact, this rotten situation is entirely due to the Clique and in Victoria, Michael Kroger, his mates and their backers. They are not the Liberal party but they have convinced the public that they are identical with it. We shall return to this.
The voter and also Liberal Party members have every right to be furious with what stands in the name of the Liberal Party, and those who have choked alternative sources to ensure only their rubbish forms the anti-intellectual framework of advice, “debate”, and policy formation. As for debate, that lot reject debate. They debate nothing. Mind, all this requires principles too and they have none; this is tellingly transparent in the States’ and Federal Parliamentary wings of the Liberal Party. It’s a right disaster.
The Great Upset
So, Viscount Monckton had the nerve to come to Australia and upset their stomachs. Really, what on earth was Monckton thinking running around Australia saying things forthrightly and out in the open against real opponents when they, the Clique, had safely killed such nonsense and iced and knifed any genuine Liberal with the guts, brains and ability to do it decades ago. The scorn of a woman is fury incarnate -
Albrechtsen heaved into her type-writer and it really looks like a ghost-writer had to wash it up a tad. A solid blue funk will not be kept down. It’s still a smelly mess.
She’s inane at the best of times. But when she blows steam, it’s the guys who are genuinely defending freedom who have to dive fast into their trenches to avoid the blast and flying shrapnel and then fight the ensuing rear guard actions. Yup, she’s no menace.
Clive Hamilton is welcome to her. A bloody relief really. She’s worked already: Clive Hamilton has blown his head off using her. In the next section, we shall finish exploring how extensive the carnage Hamilton caused himself is, by detonating earthquake Force 10 Albrechtsen. This is bloody hilarious. What many hard Leftists would avoid like the plague, Hamilton ran to.
My god, this is a scream. I need a break, because I’m breaking up in laughter. Hamilton, meister warrior, slinking in Coward’s Castle, relying on the a-neuronal to beef up his trash with another pile of dung. In a while we’ll have the rest up, for sure – it’s the best light comedy relief to come in weeks.
A heartfelt big thankyou, thankyou, thankyou Clive Hamilton for giving your all so generously. And, you now have a very large and very diverse audience truly appreciative of your qualities. Yes, no greater favour can I do for Clive Hamilton than to serve him up properly.