Mangled Thoughts

A popaganda blue print to attempt to cloak the planned destruction of Australians, and convince Australians arsenic is nothing more than a good cup of tea taken with scones heaped with jam and cream.

Three key claims the Centre for Independent Studies makes are:

1. Co2 taxes are costless. Well they are if you consider the mass destruction of capital costless, and the resulting human misery the height of prosperity, splendour, and joy.

2. The taxes will miraculously render by no stretch of the imagination economically worthless ‘alternatives’ “competitive”, ad will do the work of abundant, cheap coal based energy. The CIS can test their abundant energy from an ‘alternative claim right now by every one these liars leading by example and volunteering for immdediate open heart surgery in a hospital powered solely by one of their ‘alternatives’, a bloody useless windmill. One would like to have recommended to these cowardly lobbyists brain surgery, but they have none to operate on.

3. Australians can be compensated for impact through transfers and tax cuts. The man in the street knows there are no incomes full stop if the generator of income, capital is destroyed. This is before demonstrating the bleeding obvious from thoery, and ranging cases studies to ram home the ugly truth. The CIS are as divorced from truth the and modest man as are the Rudd brown panatalooned Cabinet of Fascist slobs.

Now, though he didn’t realise he did it, Kim “Il” Carr, Rudd’s designated central planner for manufacturing, has conceded the killer truth: Co2 destroys capital. This is what the Centre for Independent Studies also deliberately lies about and it has to, because it is a Lobbyist for concerns seeking to make squillions out of this grotestque, treacherous fraud to ruin Australians.

To reinforce the above, in Continued below, is reproduced an exchange in the Senate, yesterday. Kim “Il” Carr, rather as the CIS, tries evasion, protestation, and smear to avoid answering the truth about the impact of Co2 taxes. Yet, to repeat, inadvertantly he conceded the case.

It’s a pity Liberal MPs are not armed with sound economics, because they could have a fun time shredding into bloodied little bits of cut up ribbon both Kim “Il” Carr and Penny Wong, the dumbest snivelling wannabe Attila the Huness and cretin in the Rudd Cabinet and this is no mean feat:

Rudd’s front bench runs only a nostril length behind the stupid cow. Wong “the flounderer”, of whom the Institute of Public Affairs is afraid of. It is hilarious watching the IPA run up the white flag before Penny “the little dribbler” Wong, and then dart into their clubrooms, bolting the steel doors and wetting their pants.

The responses by Carr and Wong also point to the sheer scale of their central planning fantasies, which will be explored further in other items. Oh, what was that rubbish you were on about Professor Sinclair Davidson, about manufacturing being a game of Roulette played in a home cottage filled with grannies clacking away with their knitting needles?

(Continued)

This is an instalment of the follow up to, Centre for Independent Studies has caused great damage. This instalment takes up -

“Hansard will be brought to bear, to lift out the above…”

The Rudd Cabinet, in their desire to prove themselves the greatest cental planners in history, fusing corporativo and zwangswirtschaft in order to masterplan worse. To reiterate, Penny Wong stated the Cabinet’s aim, in a singularly chilling statement to the Senate:

‘What is involved is a whole of economy approach. We are planning a new economic future for Australians’.

By gum, there I was assuming there could be nothing worse than mass destruction through Co2 taxation and it is wrong.

Let there be no mistake about this. Rudd and his gang of psychopaths are using the very arguments the Centre for Independent Studies put to excuse the economic destruction of Australians via Co2 taxation.

Until the Centre for Independent Studies threw their lot in with the ‘let’s get wealthy by larceny and destroying Australians by Co2 taxation’ brigade, it wasn’t clear yet who led in the daily stakes of how to help the diseased Left to absolutism. Is it the HR Nicholls Society (over labour market reform and how they brought down the Liberal Party with it), or the Centre for Independent Studies. The CIS took a 3,000 furlongs lead. The Institute for Public Affairs is half a neck behind Nicholls Soc. Boys.

The only thing ‘neo’ about Rudd’s megalomaniacal vision is, this will be the first time in Australian history that Australians will have no choice but to endure what the Europeans have found a devestating exercise.

The supine, ‘pragamatic’, economically illiterate ‘Right’ paved the way for the danger now about to be detonated. This brilliant achievement of the gutless, statist ‘Right’ will be the subject of another instalment on what was foreshadowed in the first item. Now for the arsenic declared to Parliament and fixed in Hansard.

Hansard Tuesday, 26 August 2008

Climate Change

Here is good old diseased Leftist, Bob Brown, who qualifies for what his state ordered murder euthanasia Bill prescribes, a quick end to the unpleasant:

“Senator BOB BROWN (2.42 pm)—My question is also to the Minister for Climate Change and Water, Senator Wong…

Senator Martin Ferguson, is hosting a meeting of some 60 vested interests in this place on Friday so that they can complain about and lobby for their exemptions from a carbon trading scheme. I ask the minister: will she or the Prime Minister be present at that meeting?”

Ya, what did nasty old capitalists do to Brown and his gang of spoilt, wealthy middle class brats, apart from making them wealthy? Oh, this was the crime, making them wealthy.

“Senator WONG—I thank Senator Bob Brown for his question. As the Senate would be aware, we released over the break a green paper which outlined in a fair amount of detail the government’s proposals on the design of the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme…

It is the case that this is a whole-of-economy reform.”

Bingo, there it is, the very line that Mussolini, Hitler, Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin, and Mao could have said. They oddly enough did but not, obviously, as coarsely as Rudd’s Kommissar for enforcing adherence to the Greens’ cult of death put it. She did not hold back on stating the Cabinet’s new red dawn:

“This is a whole-of-economy reform and there is a whole-of-government response.”

I say, does this mean the might of the armed forces will be directing tremendous fire power against the ‘enemy’, Co2 emitting man. Will ASIO raise plans to counter Co2 subversives, enemy agents and 5th columnists?

Here is the element, corporativo -

“that ministers across an range of portfolios consult closely with both business and members of the community about their views on this issue.”

“I have met with environmental groups; I told you that in my primary answer. The reality is that ministers across a range of portfolios will consult…”

Here is Kim “Il” Carr:

” What I can say is that the government’s proposals in regard to this important initiative mean that we as a country are for the first time actually able to prepare ourselves for the inevitability of climate change and to do so in a manner which will actually preserve jobs, provide opportunities for Australians and mean that we are able to meet the challenges that we are confronting head-on.

“Inevitably, there will be cost increases as a result of
these changes. But there have equally…”

Carr is a hard Leftist and keen central planner in the Soviet style. Not scared by this telling point? Then, reconsider on digesting his continuation:

“But there have equally been measures taken by this government to… as we have heard from Senator Wong, to ensure that there is a proper consideration of these matters… without pretending that we can give some sort of renaissance to the climate change sceptics in a manner which seeks to avoid the inevitability of these issues.”

In another answer, he assured Parliament of exactly what they are about, absolutism to order economic destruction:

“What we have now in this country is a government that is actually committed to ensuring that this country is prepared for the future…”

Wong, again:

“I do want to make this point This is an extremely important issue in terms of preparing this nation for future challenges and it is not an easy policy debate.”

That is a “porky”. It is transparent that it is all too ‘easy’ for this lot of fascist thugs to prepare what they are about to do to Australians.

Lastly, the Kommissar Penny Wong puts beyond doubt, the Rudd Cabinet is preparing for outright absolutism:

“There should be, and that is the whole purpose of the process we have outlined—issuing a green paper and working methodically through that and the economic modelling which will be issued and made public in October as well as Professor Garnaut’s report. That whole process is a methodical, careful process of determining the best outcome for this country. I hope that the opposition over time will stop the sort of scaremongering that we have seen in recent months on this…”

“Scaremongering”? In the face of pschopathic thugs in Executive office, out to seize what are nothing but absolutist powers, and impose Soviet style economics, it is not scaremongering to say so.

This is what the scrofulous “Right” flung into office. This is what the Centre for Independent Studies is deliberately aiding through the arsenic it calls economic analysis. This is what the CIS is lobbying for.

Bye the bye, Professor Sinclair Davidson, readers are keen to peruse the brilliant paper defending the CIS and its actions that you have promised. Ah, I see, you are adding the final touches.

On Monday, this fascinating exploration into exactly what the cleptomaniacal “Right” slung into Office will be resumed.

In Rudd’s new way,-corporative andzwangswirtschaft, iit was putwhether the Rudd Cabinet’s grand plans might not be a fusion of Corporativo and Zwangswirtschaft. It’s worse.

Centre for Independent Studies has caused great damage. Along with their pals in the Institute of Public Affairs, the HR Nicholls Society, Michael Kroger and his chums, and this is only a short list of the unprincipled ignoramuses, including Peter Costello who have not merely strangled the Liberal Party. They have done far worse than this. They paved the way for Rudd and co.

There is one other thing to muse before launching into the rub of this piece. Perfect competition, as a fiction is thus not only no explanation of markets, and pertinently free markets. It discredits the effort to defend free markets, a thoroughly sound and moral cause. It smashes the effort. Next, it supplies ammo to interfering politicians. Take regulation as an example, an abysmal one at that.

Regulation is not the rule of (common law). It is taxation and strangles markets. It also serves Statism, incipient absolutism. The assumption of Perfect competition is why The Centre for Independent Studies and the IPA have failed over decades to fight for and defend free markets.

It is why, to the contrary, they provided advice on how the Executive can increase regulatory control over Australians, and continue to do so. They did this during the decade of the Kennett administration and the 12 years of the Howard administration.

Combined with their execrable conduct, these wreckers, and their fellow cleptomaniacal, narcissistic dunderheads of the ‘Right’ not only helped to fling Rudd into Cabinet. They laid the foundations, paved the way for Rudd and what he is about to do to Australians. Senator Wong, Rudd’s chief priestess for the Greens’ cult of death and economic destruction through Co2 taxation announced on Monday:

‘What is involved is a whole of economy approach. We are planning a new economic future for Australians’.

Who else said much the same thing? Mussolini, Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Mao and his gang of butchers, Pol Pot, and Castro; that’s who.

Wong’s short sentence boomed across the Senate did send a chill down the spine.

A couple of months ago, Rudd’s senior ministers declared, many goods will have to be scrapped for Kyoto compliant replacement products. They include heating appliances, kitchen appliances, a whole range of appliances, tools and whatever other apparently evil device that ‘hurts itty wittle bubba mad mudder bloody nature’.

Co2 taxation will wipe out energy companies and thus firms will also collapse because there will be no energy. Assume, however and for some mystical reason they survived. What are they talking about? They are talking about destroying efficient lattices of production and dictating new capital combinations be set up. This alone, it is easy to discern without stepping through all the implications, is staggering in force. As with Wong’s announcement, it is also incipiently totalitarian.

The week before, we had the Bracks’ plan unfurled, billions to be squandered on a ‘volk’s’ car. Needless to say, more larceny to support another scam, in something no one is prepared to freely buy.

Today, Rudd’s Cabinet of brown pantalooned dictators announced, extensive price controls, but guess what? They use the euphemism ‘price standardisation’. They are also all for breaking up companies, because this is what ‘anti-trust laws’ are about - attacking consumers, destroying efficient firms, and protecting those who produce nothing much at all.

45 % of farm operations are genuine enterprises, producing 92% of total agricultural output. The remainder are loss making, not by any stretch of the imagination consumer serving, ‘lifestyle’ indulgences subsisidised to the hilt. This 55% are supporting ‘anti-trust’ measures. Two of their their ‘MPs’, Bob Katter and Tony Windsor, relying on the falsehood of perfect competition, declared the ACCC is a toothless tiger; supermarket chains should be broken up; that there should be a central price fixing board setting ‘fair prices for farmers’. They declared, ‘the notion of serving customers is wrong, it misses the point; without farmers they will have no food’.

Knock out the 45 % of genuine agri businesses producing for consumers, running to markets. and let’s see what we have. The 55% that are so good Australians would starve to death if they relied on them for supply.

Listening to what the Rudd Cabinet has declared in Cabinet this week, it is hardly exaggeration to speak of his ‘grand plan’ as not simply central planning, though this is damning. There is sufficient in what they have laid out to date to begin calling it Corporativo and Zwangswirtschaft.

These developments are reinforced by what is an increasingly strident attack on free markets by:

-ALP members

-ACTU thugs, who were vociferous this week against free markets

-Bush socialists pretending to be businessmen and women

-Staggeringly, Liberal MPs! This is correct. Some who did so, to be sure, are too stupid to realise this is what they are doing, and have never been enlightened by the likes of the Centre for Independent Studies.

The above is brief,but today has been another of unceasing interruptions. So, one apologises to readers for being light on the juice this week. Tomorrow, however, will be a Festshrift day. Hansard will be brought to bear, to lift out the above. A few outstanding matters will be written up. And, Centre for Independent Studies Institute of Public Affairs, the HR Nicholls Society, and the rest of the death rattling ‘Right’ will be hammered again, including on the matter of how they laid the foundations, paved the way for Rudd and what he is about to do to Australians.

It is chilling: Australians are being trampled over by a pack of venal psychopaths, the zombie ‘Right’ and the diseased Left. After all, it is the zombie Right who set up their own “let’s destroy Australians through Co2 taxation cheer squad”, and too many of them hope to make billions from pretending to be junior high school cheer squad girls and larceny courtesy of their pal, Kevin “Little Mussolini Rudd”.

Greg Lindsay and his Centre for Independent Studies are having a major breakdown. It’s sad really, they are ruining their comfy clubrooms. Good and they brought it upon themselves.

What has tipped them over the edge from their ususal whining, stamping their feet, screaming and sobbing, is obvious. Exposure for what they stand for and are through the looking glass of their full support and lobbying for the economic destruction of Australians through Co2 taxes. They tipped themselves over the edge the day they crossed the line and became lobbyists for larcenous parasites.

It must be repeated that these actions, including of those paying for the campaign, entails violations of the tax. Violations carry prison sentences. It is easy to spot, so it can be safely assumed the ATO have. Targets usually discover the ATO are after them only when they are hauled before a judge and sentenced to the University of Criminals.

Bye the bye, the Business Council of Australia has broken ranks with the Right’s clunker tanks CIS and IPA. They probably threw Hugh Morgan overboard too, noting Hugh ‘the WMC atomic bomb’ Morgan, and Ron ‘the lurching Ronnie’ Walker also hope to make squillions out of Co2 tax destruction day (these two are consistent). This morning the BCA came out and declared, ‘Carbon taxes will destroy companies Australia wide.’ I suppose the CIS could try to tell the BCA Co2 taxes are ‘costless’, if they fancy having their heads torn off.

Greg Lindsay and the CIS are twisted, as well as brainless, to deny science and economics in the fight against Co2 taxes and the excuse for it, the diseased Greens’ lies. Malicious also in smearing those who had the hide to point out what is wrong with their position. Abandonment by the BCA adds a comic touch. The deranged entombed in their clubrooms they soaked donors mulit-millions for.

It might be a lonely feeling, publicly exposure for intellectual fraud in economics and science. Shame, however, doesn’t disturb them. This, shame, however, doesn’t disturb them.

It is a mixture of hubris, resentment, bitterness, schizophrenia, anger, and thwarted venality, that shows out. To cap it off, the ATO breathing down their necks. This is a recipe for a hideous, tremendous breakdown and the CIS and Greg Lindsay are full of it. So are the IPA and the HR Nicholls Society in all but the ATO respects. Consequently, Lindsay blew the bottom of the barrel to find Humphreys to do his dirty work on Co2 taxes. And, dredged up a troll club, Catallaxy and the ALS, to make him and the CIS feel important, good, loved, and to mount a non-existent defence.

They, the troll club, are the same as diseased Leftists Quiggin and Lambert and their trolls. They wield rubber knives and use them, fishwives blowing bubbles and sticking their tongues out on various sites. Why, we have been treated to another titbit of little girls training to be vicious fishwives in action, Ess and.

Not, though, to grumble. To the contrary, they have delivered a pleasant surprise. These guys go out to what they call hunting and stab their noses every time. Lindsay and the CIS are in the middle of a very big crack up to rely on clowns like these hissing ‘poody cats’.

Ess has kindly comments by the good Professor Sinclair Davidson. What backstabbing, snide remarks Davidson has fathomed this time? Are they his typical raspberries or a truly ingeniously infantile chunder? What a surprise.

Davidson, a-typically, has finally acknowledged Mr. Jackson’s superiority in economics, though snidely, smearingly, grudgingly conceded as his statement shows:

“he has no professional qualifications, no professional affiliations and no professional publications. He is, at best, a gifted amateur - and a fine amateur he is too.”

Firstly, though unable to say what degree, it is certain from his articles Jackson went up to University and read economics.It is also obvious he didn’t stop there, and became the fine economist he is today. He is recognised internationally as theoretician and leading exponent of Austrian school economics. In addition the ACTU acknowledges Jackson is formidable and this is why they fear him, unlike the clowns in the clunk tanks. The ILO hold Jackson is essential reading. But wait, there’s more recognition:

Economists I correspond with and since Sinker ‘the sinking man’ Davidson is impressed by credentialism, they have Phds, are forthright about Jackson’s work, the esteem it and him too. I have met others in very serious positions, and the uncanny thing is they have all remarked they find him incisive:

“Jackson has an uncanny ability to get to the heart of a matter…”

And sort it out accurately and swiftly. Indeed he is, as this example shows:

Liberal Government and labour market reform: more fallacious attacks

It is as well to recollect seminal advances in theory were made by men without degrees and those with but not in economics. Keynes produced his poison having expended all of a single term of lectures in economics.

It is awfully decent of Sinclair Davidson to concede Jackson is intellectually formidable in economics. It is rare for amateurs, no matter how brilliant, to lead in a field. It takes work, application, matched by depth and breadth, virtues the CIS, IPA and HR Nicholls are devoid of - and these crippling defects have been remarked on by very serious people I am acquainted with. They are virtues Jackson is fully possessed of, as his work shows.

Still unable to help himself, Sinclair threw this gem in:

“His response to Humphreys was unacceptably poor - reflecting his amateur status…”

What’s the matter, Sinkers? Upset stomach over Jackson demolishing the CIS pack of lies, put through Humphreys, effortlessly, from Austrian capital theory? If, as you say, it is ‘poor’, then you must demonstrate why, in public. It wouldn’t be a surprise if Jackson let you publish a rebuttal on Brookesnews on where Jackson’s analysis is wrong. He’s let others reply on his site (only to demolish them all over again).

It is clear why Professor ‘Sinkers’ Sinclair won’t confront Jackson directly. It’s called cowardice. All that is seen of Sinkers is him running around sites doing nothing but trying to damage Jackson’s reputation as an economist. What sort of “Professor” does this, sacrificing truth and honesty with it?

Sinclair then writes:

“his spear-carriers have further undermined his previously good reputation as a commentator by their silliness.”

Smears, now lies. I, for one, have not met Jackson. My attack on, for example, Co2 taxation and the disgusting CIS fraud, has melded Austrian economics and case studies. This is a different approach to Jackson’s, who is arguing strictly from within solid economic theory.

He happens to also bring it to bear for the benefit of the public in his articles. The HR Nicholls Society, IPA, and CIS are such cowards they even refuse to account for themselves to the man in the street. They run away. Instead, they lickthe boots of the diseased Left dominated media, put risible ’submissions’ to Parliamentary Committees and unheard outside, and which in sum state “We are here to see Australians drink all the arsenic the government can pump out.’ This is a very strange notion of fighting the Left and advancing good causes.

Then, this lot cannot fight good causes. They destroyed the campaign for labour market reform. They discredit the free market cause in general, effortlessly. They claim to be experts on Hayek and show how illiterate they are on Hayek and perforce the Austrian school.

As for Humphreys, he is on the same wavelength as Andrew Andy Pandy Kemp and Chris the Castroingo Kid, pulseless. The CIS-Humphreys paper is as excruciatingly bad as the garbage pumped out by these two unfused bulbs. Indeed, the only reason why I bothered with the Humphreys paper is that it is the CIS position and spring for its lobby campaign.

Jackson’s treatment of the lobby paper was, in my books, extremely generous to a pack of thugs acting as lobbyists for a pack of bastards. A pack of gibbering soakers who give a stuff about destroying Australians through carbon taxation.

In his feeble efforts to defend the CIS, Davidson smeared Jackson. However what does it disclose about this ‘good professor’ that he defends the intellectually indefensible, and a crew of larcenous parasites who don’t give a stuff about destroying Australians? Davidson’s concern for poor Humpers is inverted morality.

Hmmm, to check again, if Jackson were a mere amateur, besides his mastery of theory, how could Jackson have delivered a thorough demolition of the Berg-Kemp pack of flies called “Islam and the Free Market”, in an excellent survey of the history of economic thought? Oh, this still hurts Davidson, and given that one also ripped into Berg-Kemp, I enjoyed demolishing it all over again when these bright sparks proceeded to make the same claim about the history of philosophy and theology. It was unforgettable reading Sinclair pleading to Amir to never refer to it again.

Now, I simply cannot help myself, but I recall a Sinclair Davidson – Castroingo Kid Berg paper. The measure of how bad it is distilled in one superficial sentence declaring production is nothing more than ‘making things’, mere little home cottage industry that won’t be missed if wiped out. In this paper, they pressed again the demand for destruction through Co2 taxation.

We have a real problem today, the fascist Kevin Rudd Cabinet and it’s lust for central planning. The Davidson –Berg reflects why, over the decades, the ignorant Right have caused great damage and paved the way for Kevin Rudd and his fascist gangsters. Then, there is Jackson’s demolition of that junk.

That is the best Greg Lindsay and the Centre for Independent Studies can manage in their defence? Whining fishwives wielding plastic knives behind the backs of their betters? Who else would be stupid enough, apart from the diseased Left, to go into bat for measures that will destroy Australians and Australia? Right now, it is Rudd and his Cabinet of fascists and the treacherous Left who love these bastards. In the meant-time, how is the lobby business looking now, Greg Lindsay?

That’s it for this week. Concentrating on the CIS this week has been no indulgence. The reasons why are glaringly obvious. Not that we shall desist. To the contrary, we will stitch them up again next week when attending to other matters, such as Kevin Rudd’s lust for grand central planning, and how this pack of psychopathic morons found themselves in Government.

To Anon, not forgotten next response to your last. Will also put it up next week.

Happy weekend Lindsay.

Having said it once, it is time to say it again.

The federal opposition has called for a national solar payment to encourage more home owners to generate solar power.

Opposition environment spokesman Greg Hunt on Monday said a draft plan should be prepared for a national tariff… .

“A national solar feed-in tariff could provide an immediate boost to domestic solar power uptake.”

Mr Hunt also told the Climate Action Network Australia conference that the nation needs to develop large-scale projects to create baseload solar power.

“Much needs to be done on this front in relation to cost, reliability and storage of energy.

Former prime minister John Howard…. argued that renewable energy sources like solar and wind could not provide baseload power using existing technologies.

Mr Hunt said the coalition now has a vision of Australia becoming the world’s first “solar continent”.

Howard remains absolutely correct. Hunt is a moron and a disgrace. Three hot red Greens’ ministers in the Howard Cabinet -

Ian Campbell David Kemp Malcolm Turnbull

Now, Greg ‘the blathering uber Toorak village idiot’ Hunt. Has Hunt asked Red Ted Baillieu whether he can swipe the mantle? Thought not.

This fith rate ignoramus, ignorant in science, economics and law, read ‘law’ at the University of Melbourne. Mind, a degree in law is no guarantee at all graduates are learned in anything remotely germane to law. Just joking. Today, it is a guarantee that they are totally ignorant in law - look at Nobel prize winning jurist Peter Costello.

The majority these days believe common law is quaint tribal practices, and this is no joke. They are grounded in the rule of dictators, ‘positive law’. Ask them a serious question requiring sound scholarship to answer and they stare back, blankly - a good sign of cretinism.

Reading law, as Hunt explained, makes him a physicist. Thus, ex cathedra, he declared the Greens’ lies are all true. For some unfathomable reason he reminds one of the Centre for Independent Studies, but this can’t be right. They at the Centre for Independent Studies know, apart from John Humphreys, they are peddling lies and economic arsenic. Hunt is the Federal Liberal Parliamentary Party’s Humphreys. Well done Hunt, spastic extraodinaire with wood leaves on crossed bicycle spokes.

Having said it once…. and, why, it was only early this month too!

Greg Hunt, MP, has done Australians a great service

To repeat:

Hunt is typical of what Michael Kroger and Peter Costello have done to the Victorian Liberal Party, with Federal and State positions and seats, as aided and abetted by their gutless comrades in:

HR Nicholls Society, The Centre for Independent Studies, and the Institute of Public Affairs

Stuffed it with cretins, while suppressing the rabble called genuine Liberal Party members.

Federal Liberal MPs cried crocodile tears in Parliament over a family that sunk a sum into ‘pholtovaic cell production’, subsidised to the hilt of course, and went broke because an admin technicality cut the supply of stolen private property into their coffers. Serve them right for being a willing party to larceny and receiving stolen goods.

For the benefit of this little snivelling brat, Greg Hunt, apart from all that has been written on why ‘alternative energy’ is a complete economic disaster that will destroy Australians, he might care to ponder also this:

East Europeans fear climate policy pinch By Anna Mudeva -

GORNO OSENOVO, Bulgaria, July 28 (Reuters) - Many pensioners in the Bulgarian village of Gorno Osenovo, who go to bed with the sunset and wake up at sunrise, have never heard of carbon dioxide. They don’t get electricity either.

But a new plan by Brussels to make European Union energy companies pay for the carbon dioxide they emit from 2013 threatens to…

Poland is also concerned about possible closures at its huge mining industry, which employs some 140,000 people.

Back in Gorno Osenovo, the villagers have been let down by renewables. Three years ago a Bulgarian company erected several solar-powered street lamps but the light went off a few months later.

Oh, darn, what was it that the CIS is lying about… Co2 Taxes are costless and it doesn’t destroy capital!

This bastard could be a CIS ‘gun’, or Malcolm Turnbull:

“These countries have to do something. It’s a long-term policy and they need to start now,” said Colette Lewiner, director Energy, Utilities & Chemicals at consultancy Capgemini. “They can do a lot, not just waste energy for nothing.”

That’s right Lewiner, that’s why they want real ‘renewable energy’, such as economically efficient coal based power companies and not bloody solar panels that Hunt believes will power even his sunbeam house.

Oh, dear, and here’s someone who also terrifies the brainless CIS, IPA, HR Nicholls Society, and inbred congenital idiots occupying precious Liberal seats:

Gerard Jackson:

Lefty journo pushes green solar scam

Stupid journalists promote the great solar scam

Why a Carbon Tax Would Hit Living Standards