UN, den of diseased Leftists who are anti-Semites. The lying media
Wednesday, January 7, 2009
It’s ‘OK’ for Islamo-Nazi terrorists to murder Israelis, firing rockets and sending in ’suicide bombers’, killing Israeli children in schools, in their homes and in the streets. Israel fights back, to eliminate terrorist cells, and that is called an “atrocity”. Israel, apparently, should lie back and serenely allow the Islamo-Nazis commit Holocaust II and supported by their great ally the UN. Meanwhile, in Australia, the media commentariat are doing their best to cover for the vermin whom the diseased Left portray as regular nice guys, who are ony victims of those hideous ‘occupiers’ of “Palestine”, Israel.
It’s not only Lying Leftist central either - ABC, and The Age aka “The Spencer Street Soviet”. Those who consider the Herald Sun and radio station 3AW as counters to the Left are in noddy land. 3AW ‘presenters’ daily wring their hands: “it’s all too complex”; “there must be a way to end the conflict”; “who is in the right”.
The real horror is Israel taking action against rodents. Needless to say, 3AW and the Herald Sun have also played up the latest ‘atrocity’, the wiping out of a Hamas terrorist hold, formally a UN school for ‘Palestinian’ children. The sheer laziness of ‘journalists’ is reflected in their confusion and their false sense of outrage and false pity.
A firm grip on history is required for clarity, as one intellectual requirement. Absence of the modern disease of shallow, “moral equivalence” is another. Both covers things the idiot “Right” are also happily oblivious to.
As for the UN, ’General Assembly President’ Miguel d’Escoto calling Israel’s defensive action an ’atrocity’ and a ”holocaust” perpetrated against the “Palestinians”, typifies the UN. De Escoto is a hater of the Jewish people, and here a few ripe facts summing this thug up:
- He is a supporter of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
- He’s a Sandanista. In the 1980’s, he was
- A long committed diseased Leftist, 1980s, d’Escoto was the foreign minister for the Sandinista regime, and sought to establish strong ties with the Soviet regime and Arab regimes. He established a PLO ‘embassy’ in Managua. They engaged in persecution of Jews in Nicaragua, who, understandably, fled the country. The Sandanistas deny the Holocaust was committed by the Nazi regime.
They are a few brief facts and some readers might opine they ‘prove nothing’. To the contrary, they square with the mountain of evidence condemning the UN.
Before crushing rotten eggs, let’s summarise some hard historical facts.
History
Introduction
The lie, Israel are occupiers of “Palestine” and drove them out of their country, is not only told by lying journalists and ‘academics’. It is mouthed by the man in the street, but he is excused, because he is not equipped to punch the truth through mud and slime. Sadly, neither are the “Right-wing” and their clunking think tanks the IPA and CIS, which defect is compounded by their gutlessness (they cower before hard leftists). A major influence that pushed the lie was lefist historians, zeroing in on in particular Marxist,Toynbee, who wove a complete tissue of lies in order to attack Israel and support the Arabs against Israel.
In, Jewish Rights in Palestine (1962), he began:
“In the current dispute over Palestine ,the immediate claimants are the Palestinian Arabs on the one side and the Jews now in Palestine on the other…”
He expanded on ‘now in Palestine’. He asserted, the Romans `exterminated’ the Jewish population of ‘Palestinian’ in the two Jewish-Roman wars. The Arabs succeeded as the ‘native inhabitants’. Modern Israel, according to Toynbee, is a fiction without a shred of historical foundations to it, generated out of the Balfour Declaration of 1917, and Western guilt:
“if not for their (Germany) atrocities against the European Jews … there would not have been the pressure there was to turn palestine into an asylum for the jews…. The genocide was not committed by Arabs… Yet it is (they)…. who have been made by Germany’s fellow -Westerners, the Western Victors in the Second World War, to pay for Germany’s crimes.”
These two developments, according to Toynbee, created the opportunity for an intruder Jewish population to take “Palestine” by conquest, overthrowing and expelling the ’native Palestinians’ in the 1940’s, and establish a bastard state called Israel. Toynbee’s account is not only a pack of lies purveyed as history, it involves a glaring contradiction coated in hypocrisy.
Ancient History
The Roman Empire, according to Toynbee, ended the existence of Judaea. They conquered the Jews and thus they were no more an independent people, and their independent country was no more. They ceased to exist as an independent people. This is a pack of lies. They ceased to exist. What, bye they way, of the previous Greek, Persian,Babylonian, Assyrian,and Egyptian periods? Toynbee’s history is very peculiar.
Toynbee compared the Arab-Muslim conquest with the foundation of Jerusalem and Judaea as the country of the Jewish people, as accomplished by invasion and conquest. He is speaking of the biblical wars of Joshua, with the kingdoms of Judaea and Israel, according to Toynbee. He asserted that it is arrant hypocrisy to accept the foundation of the Jewish people as legitimate but deny the same for the `Palestinian Arabs’. Since it is Toynbee who considers modern Israel was established only by conquest and yet declares Israel to be illegitimate, it is Toynbee who hung his hat on the rack of hypocrisy. It’s OK for others to trample over Jews but not the Jews?! No, not quite right; they did it once, long ago, but, hey, it’s not fair they do it twice, it’s the Arab’s turn.
He deliberately committed the fallacy of generalisation in order to prop up his home-spun account of Jewish and Middle Eastern history. It is a rather strange notion at that:
Conquest is a means by which a conqueror not only takes over another country and asserts administrative control over it. Conquest means the conquered no longer exist. This is certainly not true of Jewish history; Toynbee lied.
The conquered in the ancient middle East remained an independent people with their country theirs. They were bound only, under force of course, as vassal to the the Overlord King, formalised in vassal treaties. The terms specified conditions which the vassal King had to fulfil. Standard expressions included familiars like ‘brother’. The overlord would protect his brother/son , and do so for as long as the other ‘brother’ fulfilled his ‘brotherly’ obligations, which were the point of conquest, to extract taxes as ‘tribute’ from vassal kingdoms.
Even the harshest, most brutal of vassal lords, the Assyrian, were no exception. The Assyrians were ever-ready to take direct administrative control of a vassal. They did this, however, in strict form.
Their tactic was to impose the harshest terms on a vassal, calculated to provoke revolt by the vassal. The Assyrians would mount a bloody campaign, completed with execution of prominent people and impose additional burdens. Vassal revolts provided the “legal” trigger to slaughter most of the ruling house and enough of the supporting aristocratic families and install their own administration . Yet, they never equated that with, ’that country is now mine; it and the people no longer exist. It is now Little Assyria.’
Under successive empires, noting the major differences between them, Judaea remained always the land of the Jewish people. The Roman Empire did not liquidate them, and it was not by any stretch of historical truth the aim of the Romans.
Neither were the Romans interested in interfering in their domestic affairs. Certainly there were restrictions, capital crime trials as an example. The Sanhedrin had no competence whatsoever on such matters, and so the the trial of Jesus - the pithy `King of the Jews’ amplifies why Pilate tried Jesus. The Roman empire was a military - adminstrative order, and was brutal, but the Romans did respect those with history behind them, including the Jewish people.
Toynbee lied about the cause of the two Roman-Jewish wars. They were brought on bys self-styled, to use modern expression, national liberationists. Bloodthirsty types such as the Siccari, with a totalitarian bent, who were far more odious and dangerous to Jews than Romans. As Josphesus attested, the modest Jew wasn’t given to ‘nationalist’ wars, they were still independent, and it was understood, it only spelt misery for the Jewish people. and peace, but this did not stop the thugs busy press-ganging them into war against Rome. The Romans destroyed the Temple to put an end to such violent inclinations.
The crisis of the Judaeans was not a loss of independence and expulsion from Judaea. The Romans did not do this, it was still the land of the Jewish people. The crisis was the destruction of the Temple. It was one of the first major themes of the second great body of Jewish classical literature the Talmuds Babylon and Jerusalem, followed by the commentaries and tractates. These collections received their seminal departure point from the somewhat secular Mishne.
Not only through the above empires but also, through the Arab and Turkic empires, from c. mid 4th century c.e. to 1917, some 1,600 years of history. From the conclusion to the second Jewish-Roman war to 1917, ‘Palestine’ remained the Jewish country and Jerusalem their capital. Though, under Islamic rule, they were much reduced -their property could be confiscated; subjected to very high rates of taxation; persecuted; massacred by Allah’s butchers; all alleviated by the hilarity of being subject to bouts of mere mob violence. But, it was still the country of the Jewish people.
It should be noted, the Crusaders did not expel and overthrow the Jewish people, and liquidate their country.
Damascus was the capital of the Arab world, Mecca its centre. The Arabs who conquered Jerusalem were composed of mainly the southern desert tribes and for the Arab empires, as also the Turkic empire, the interest was economic and military control. Palestine remained Jewish country and Jerusalem their capital all down those centuries, through to 1917 and on to the present.
The history of the Jews does not rest on ‘the Bible told me so’. The Bible is a collection of types of literature. The essential point is, the Jewish were not invaders. The history of the Jewish people and Israel stands on solid, secular ground. To use the expression - natives, they are the natives of what is called “Palestine”. Jerusalem is their ancient capital. The the historical fact is:
The ancient Jews were the original inhabitants of Judaea. In other words, Jewish history begins with that stark, mundane observation. Not invaders, not outsiders to the Jordanian defile from Cis- Jordan to trans- Jordan, just the people who populated Judaea, whose dialect was Judahite.
The Jewish people survived, endured the ructions of history as an independent people, with their capital and country intact. Descendants of other ancients, civilised nations of the ancient East have not fared so well, as their plight under Islamo-Arabic-fascist regimes shows - and the bleeding heart brigade care no more for these than they do for “Joos”.
It is time to blow up that monstrosity that now sits on the Mount. The Mount was the seat of the ancient Jewish kings. There is a wealth of material to be uncovered. I’ve had a very interesting eye-opener of a conversation with an archaeologist on this.
20th century to the present
The Jews conquered and expelled “Palestinians” is a lie, just as it is a lie to say there is a distinct Palestinian people, when what is referred to is Arab Muslims. Toynbee couldn’t help himself, he had to re-write all of Jewish history to the 1960’s.
The Jews did not invade, conquer and drive out Arabs out of their country. Neither were Arabs who left Israel refugees, and their are still no refugees from modern Israel, contrary to the lying bastards in the UN and drivelling journalists in Australia. They volitionally left out of murderous motivations.
The Balfour Declaration of 1917 did not ‘create’ Israel ex nihilo or as a capricious act of Western governments. It merely reflected what was acknowledged by the League of Nations, the forerunner to the United Nations: “Palestine” is in fact the independent land of the Jewish people, it has never ceased being that.
The League went further. It asserted that the Jewish people should be encouraged to build their economic interests, establish their own governance, should be encouraged to advance their traditions and practices and, Jews in other countries contemplating migration to the homeland of the Jewish people should be encouraged and welcomed. The Balfour Declaration merely formalised some of these crucial points, and the background to it was Chauvel and Allenby put an end to the Turkic subjugation of Middle East countries. The League’s position was not only Israel but for all countries in the Middle East to re-emrge economically and re-establish their institutions. a
Toynbee lied on another count. The Arab world was not merely influenced by the ideas of the National Socialist regime led by Hitler. They drew on them to shape their pan Arabic version of National Socialism, including the extermination of the Jews and the destruction of Israel. The trouble is, they were some years down the path before the full nightmare of what the Nazis were to commit was launched. Arab leaders were inciting Arabs long before the 1930’s and 40’s against Jews. An upshot was the massacre of the Jews of Hebron in 1929. This was 19 years before Israel’s declaration of independence in 1948.
The Arabs’ position was not a dispute conducted by gentlemanly Arabs against boorish, ingrate “Joos” over the future of “Palestine”. The Arab leaders crystallised and then drove the aim to exterminate the Jews and Israel, before 1948. This, understandably, added urgency to realisation of Jewish Independence, it had become a matter of survival for the Jewish people.
It came to a head in 1948. Azam Pasha, Secretary General, Arab League, the Arab version of a U.N. delivered their great analysis of the ‘tensions’. His prescription for resolution was observed for decades and certainly remains in force for Islamo Nazis. The Cairo paper, Al-Ahran, was lovingly quoting Pasha in May 1962 when it cried:
“The Israel- Arab problem can be solved only by war. And since Israel knows very well that we will not agree to anything less than her liquidation it is she who will start the war and will attack as in the near future.”
The Arabs wanted all , the territory and the Jews exterminated. They backed Fauzi el Kaukji and his army to do it in 1948. Israel smashed Kaukji’s army. The response of the Arabs was to launch a second war against the Jewish people in 1948, in a coalition of five countries led by Egypt and Syria, which was defeated. In a single year, the Jews had survived two massive attempts of the Arabs to seize their land and perpetrate Holocaust II.
These facts alone are major killers of Toynbee’s lies.
The Arabs’ attempt to exterminate Israel was the excuse the United Nations used to carve up Israel. Amusingly, Israel did not oppose partition, the Arabs did.
The Arab ‘leaders’ created the faux refugee problem, starting in 1948 by calling upon Arab residents to leave Israel, on the promise that the army would massacre the Jews and they could, after the overwhelming victory resume their properties and take everything the Jews had built up. (What, after all, do the dead need of assets?). They also declared, any Arab who remained in Israel is a traitor. Any traitor could be killed by loyal Arabs.
In 1955 the Israeli government made a firm offer to compensate those Arabs for the assets they had abandoned. This was a promise they did not have to commit, as the above demonstrates. It kept the offer of compensation open, on the condition the former Arab residents integrate into the Arab world, with the assistance offered in 1955 to for that transition as well as restitution. In November 1960, the Israeli government instructed its ambassador to the U.N., Mr.Comay, to re-affirm the offer in an open, public declaration before the UN. McComay delivered it on the 28th to ’The Special Political Committee’, General Assembly, U.N.
In summary, the Israeli govt. did not dispossess Arabs of assets and lawful freedoms and expel them out of Israel. To the contrary, to the extent reasonable the Israelis offered to to honour those rights by compensation. The Israelis can be accused only of committing an act of generosity towards those who sought their extermination and seize all Jews’ property.
Yet, some were robbed of their rights, they were all Jews. In the wake of 1948, Arab govts. confiscated the assets of Jewish residents and expelled them from their countries and have never made any offer of restitution for those sequestered assets. The worst was the Egyptian government, which robbed some 180,000 Jews of their property and drove them out of Egypt. The Iraq govt. put in a good effort too, robbing and persecuting 90,000 Jews.
The contrast runs deeper. The Israeli govt exhorted the Arabs not to leave but to stay and continue to add to the economic and general prosperity of themselves and Israel in general. The Israeli govt. and people did not seek the ruination of those Arabs and tried to convince them not to ruin themselves.
Even to speak of Israeli intolerance of Arab residents is not stupid, it is a deliberate lie malevolently aimed against Jews and Israel. To speak of Israeli abuse of Arabs and oppression of Arabs is a vicious lie aimed at fuelling hatred of the Jewish people and modern Israel. That the UN foments such malevolent propaganda is only further evidence of the duplicity, mendacity, and all round rottenness of the UN, more so given the record of the stance of the Israeli govt. before the UN. Ditto lying Lefist journalists, as well as those merely dunces. These lies set in relief the patience and generosity of Israel towards Arab-Nationalists and their Islamo-Nazi ‘brotherhoods’, who only sought the best for Jews - extermination.
Which brings us to the PLO , it was founded by the Arab coalition to wage war against Israel by means other than army-based operations. The PLO was not a “spontaneous popular `liberation’ movement” by ”Palestinian Arabs”. Next to Arab govts. setting it up and financing it, the Stalinist Soviet regime also backed Arafat through the KGB, which also supplied PLO with intelligence against Israel.
With the raising of the PLO, the lie of a ‘native Palestinian people’ was spun for the obvious purpose, a propaganda stunt aimed at the West. It required the co-operation of agents of influence, and diseased Leftist journalists to pump it out. It worked.
Arafat was hailed in the West as a sainted uncle whose only crime was trying to ’save his people’ from Israelis. Half wits cried crocodile tears over the fate of “Palestinian refugees booted out of their homeland by cruel Jews”. The UN chipped in, beginning its still running, consistent record of condemning Israel as a house of butchers, passing resolutions by the truckloads saying, “Israel is a criminal bastard”. After the PLO, the development of additional terrorist cells shifted to firm anchorage in Islamo-fascist cells, as opposed to the pan-Arabist-muslim blanket orientation of the likes of the PLO. Thus sprung Hamas and Hezbollah, and supplied by Syria, Iran, and until smashed, the national Socialist Baath regime of Saddam Hussein. It’s blowing up in the faces of, for example, the Egyptians, who are now in as much danger from the monsters they have spawned as is Israel.
Conclusion to survey of Israel’s history
Compressing Jewish history into a brief survey is like squishing an elephant into a shoe box. The distinction between Bible and secular history, for example, should indicate one is alluding to a background built of exacting scholarhsip. Taking it down to the present points to what a thorough treatment entails. However, the above sketching of salient lines shows how extensive are the lies and fabrications told against Israel. Nothing much new has been added to Toynbee’s pack of lies, so it made for a good demonstration of a few hard facts.
The ‘arguments’ and ’claims’ made against Israel, and those made in order to support the enemies of Israel are false. The UN and Leftist liars peddle them. The only way to smash the diseased Left, is, as on economics, to eviscerate what they spew out as arguments. Only the armed can do this. The idiot ”Right” and their clunker tanks the IPA and CIS are not armed to fight on any ground, and their intellectual feebleness, as their efforts in economics demonstrates, only yields ground to the diseased Left and this is not warranted at all.
This article will be resumed tomorrow, in Part II.