Mangled Thoughts

For joyous, spontaneous head-kicking. Members in the seat of Higgins want Michael Kroger booted out of the Party and Peter Costello turfed out of Parliament. They are fed up with the Kroger-Costello Party’s abuse of them and the Liberal Party and they are saying so.

They are saying so on radio stations. Others to flood radio stations are ex Liberal Party members. They are ex members because they had had enough of being abused by the parasitical “Right’s” abuse. Costello’s craven misuse of his Parliamentary seat is the last straw for members of Higgins, and they happily called him a venal coward on radio.

There is a fly in the ointment. The “Left wing” of the necrotic Right, the Wets, see the growing rebellion as the chance to dominate the Party again. In view of what little credibility he has, geratric Mal is giving his support in the effort to eradicate the KKR Party out of the Liberal Party. He’s backing “Red” ted against the Kroger-Costello gang. Typical, Mal seems to consider reds real talent - look at Mugabe. Well, Mugabe does have ability, he’s shown it. this Marxist has reduced Zimbabwe from a flourishing, prosperous paradise into a hell hole.

Still, at least Mal recognises the Party has been strangled by the Kroger-Costello club and this needs rectification. In view of the extensive damage this gang have done, rectification must include throwing Kroger out of the Party. His ex wife, Helen Kroger, must be sent down from the Senate and replaced with a genuine Liberal. Indeed, quite a few Federal MPs who owe their position to this lot of Party poopers need sacking and replacing with their superiors. Minchin, Georgiou, Fifield, and Reg Hunt are three MPs who must be issued the D notice.

In the fight for labour market reform there were and remains two opponents, the ACTU and the fungus brained “Right”. Who caused the damage, and continues to damage this grave and highly moral cause? The second. Incredibly, this lot blamed Howard for the defeat and for the 2007 election loss, and continue to do so.

Peter Brown commented in, RBA in a fluster: reply to “Anon”. He took exception to the reply to “Anon” on the subject of labour markets:

Gerry is that you? If not, then Douglas you are a total lunatic. You are sick. The lawyers are on their way to you and Rumcorps

This is in two parts. The first fixes an upset stomach. The second part is more damning indictments of what the frozen “Right” did and continue to do to labour market reform.

1. What is wrong Brown? Upset stomach?

Brown is free to hurl even the most offensive of invectives against me, I’ve no complaint because I happily throw in a few telling adjectives. But this alone is no good. Rule one, Brown, make sure abuse is surrounded by argument.

If wrong, Brown should have attached an argument as to why. Instead, his response is the Right’s typical notion of cut and thrust, jerk knee and come out smearing. Secondly, while the inert “Right” whine about hard leftists censorsing opponents, consider the record of the “Right”.

It is a profound insight into the Statist “Right” that it was they, through the Kennett administration, who turned the STO and OPA into a criminal racket it still is. They prepared the Victorian anti-Bill of Rights and, in view of the timing, it is reasonable to infer that they might have aimed at strengthening the criminalisation of free speech in Victoria by preparing the Blasphemy Act it was Brumby’s pleasure to have passed.

Moreover, Federal MPs of the scrofulous Right clamoured, in the final couple of years of the Howard administration, for ‘censorship’ of the Internet. What they meant was suppression of free speech - there are blogs and websites that hurt them as much as they do the diseased Left. Now what do we see:

Peter Brown, for some reason peculiar to the scrofulous Right, likes neither what Mr. Gerry Jackson writes and publishes in his news magazine, and doesn’t like what I write. His answer is not refutation but intimidation, threatening to “sick” lawyers onto Jackson, and onto me. I thank Peter Brown for providing another crystal clear insight into the treacherous but comatose “Right” for readers.

Oh, to reinforce: it is typical of the Right’s notion of ‘debate’. That was their reaction to Jackson’s devastating criticism of the IPA’s totally false ‘Islam and the free markets’ by Andrew “Andy Pandy” Kemp and Chris “the brain challenged Kid” Berg. It was their reaction, through the Centre for Independent Studies when Jackson delivered a strict Austrian economic criticism of their position paper boosting mass capital destroying carbon taxes. We know why they immediately reach for the knee jerk and smear.

They can’t defend what they write, they refuse to defend what they put, and are afraid of a direct encounter that will expose them for the hollow men that they are. They also know Jackson is solid, his defence impenetrable and that is why, instead of challenging him directly, they run about smearing him elsewhere, as Brown has done on this site. After all, millions in donors’ funds into their bank vaults is at stake and their hubristic conceited estimation of their prowess and grip.

2. What the frozen “Right” did and continue to do to labour market reform

Wreck the fight for it.

The economic case is rock solid. This they cannot wreck.

They wreck the fight for reform, and persist in wrecking it. One part why they do so is: they don’t have a clue as to what the case is. It is important to observe that from 2005 - the official launch of the campaign to the present, they have not defended what they put as the ‘case’ for reform. They ensured that they never faced open, direct exchange with, say, ACTU guns. They ran away and the reason is clear, cowardice. They have enough sense to realise, they would be shot up all over again,and they are bleeding their gizzards out as it is.

In regards to labour markets, it is plain that what pains Brown is exposure of the sheer stupidity of his heroes in the “Right” and in particular, the HR Clubmen and the fact that they are ignoramuses who have caused great damage to a rock solid and thus highly moral cause. Let’s see:

I draw attention to, for example, Walter Block and William Barnett II, An Austrian Critique of Neo – Classical Monopsony Theory.

This paper is a thorough examination of the false assumption on which monopsony, and oligopsony rests, ‘perfect competition’. Monopsony is the extension of the root fiction. They demonstrate perfect competition is the anti-free market fiction it truly is - pseudo economic theory. [There is nothing new in this demolition by the way, as Jackson’s articles also shows - from history of economic theory.] What is the importance of this?

Des Moore Moore, for instance, concedes the ACTU false claim of indeterminacy of wage rates, and of “balance of power”. The second is rooted in the falsehood of monopsony. The ACTU latched onto Card and Krueger in an attempt to lend credence to it. Jackson nailed a suicidal qualification made by Card and Kreuger, an escape hatch as it were.

The crux is: neither employer nor employee has power. There is no power to be ‘balanced’. Free markets and the marginal productivity of labour explains why, and why labour is justly paid.

The error of perfect competition involves a whole nest of errors including horizontal curves. The HR Nicholls club committed the lot, and in truly clownish style. They compounded the mess by their own idiosyncratic notions.

The ACTU’s assessment of the “Right” in the labour market wars

I had the hot flash from an ACTU heavy that they were delirious with joy when they found out the HR Nicholls Society were supplying advice to Cabinet. That, no alternative sources were involved. This was early in the piece, when the Cabinet began preparing for reform.

Futher, they were surprised Cabinet had not turned to Jackson for advice. That, they fear Jackson and their concern was, if Cabinet had turned to Jackson, they would have been smashed. Remember, not only the ACTU but also the ILO attend to Jackson’s work very carefully.

Further, they checked to make sure it wasn’t a ruse. That, the Cabinet might have been holding Jackson as a secret weapon, concealed by the screen of buffoons in the HR Nicholls Society (Bob Day is a worthy member of this circus of wreckers). This is what the ACTU did; they could not believe their lucky stars that it was true, Cabinet was hanging itself by relying on the troupe of jokers.

In March 2005, Hugh Morgan puckered up for ABC cameras (he believed Auld Bolshevik Cow’s cameras loved him and for once he got something right). Fresh from buying a $700,000 oil painting that very day, and reciting his novel theorem, told modest Australians they are paid too much.

In a few minutes, the final disasterous demolition of the campaign had been accomplished. Cabinet was warned and it ignored the warning - dump this lot and find a gun to get it right. Here’s the confirmation:

Joe Cambria, in Are Liberal Party blue bloods sinking the Government’s workplace reforms? (Nov. 2005), informed the public that the ACTU had hired the highly experienced US national pollster Vic Fingerhut (which also means the ACTU shelled out a hefty sum for his servics). His findings?

“Despite the incredibly stupid headline in the Financial Review (IR bluster fails to rouse most voters) the figures show that your campaign has made an enormous impact.

“These are powerful numbers… you’ve increased the proportion of voters who saw the issue as important to 49 per cent of the electorate and Labor is now seen as best to handle the issue by a 24 point, 50-26 point margin.

“Also, you’ve hit one of the key target audiences [the $50-$75,000 income range] with a full 40 per cent saying they are now less likely to vote Coalition as a result of its planned workplace changes.

“These are great numbers. Very few independent media campaigns –– anywhere –– do this much damage.

“These findings are absolutely devastating for the Government and its advisers, and must surely be cause for considerable alarm among Coalition MPs and Senators.”

Cambria then names the culprits for this massive defeat:

Friends of mine in the City have complained for years about Michael Kroger, Morgan and Calvert-Jones picking incompetent advisers and funding self-important twits.

Oh, defeat wasn’t inevitable. It hung on whether the Cabinet would reach for brains, but they didn’t and they stuck with the arsenic the HR Nicholls clubmen poured into them. The odd thing is, they did cut Des Moore, Ray Evans, and Hugh Morgan loose.

It was not appreciated at the time, Senator Nick Minchin, as a Cabinet Minister, had failed in his oath sworn duty by unilaterally rejecting material prepared for Cabinet. Why? His fellow HR Nicholls Society clubmen? Oh, yes, what Minchin did stinks, marked by his grovelling before his fellow clubmen over the disaster Howard was not responsible for but them.

An amusing blackwash

Des Moore and Ray Evans each made a submission to the July 2007 hearing of the Fair Pay Commission. Being absent of economics, the submissions are revealing for entirely different reasons to these:

Any submission to the Commission would, presumably, contain a proposition and the case for why the proposition is sound. An economic case in fact.

Moore’s paper is 2½ pages long, bears a grandiloquent title, and littered with the perpendicular “I”. He showed his “classical literary learning” in a nice, callous touch. He quoted Luke 6:20. Not a few have noted Moore’s ‘delicacy’. He, as Evans did, told the Commission to read their classics on labour markets for all that they need to know.

Ray Evans’ paper has a modest title but overtook Des in the “look at me stakes”. His paper is 5½ pages, on the HRNS letterhead, with a postscript: “Mr. Ray Evans is the President of the HRNS.” [Is that for life, or just all eternity?]

I showed the ’submissions’ to a senior executive of a large concern. Finished reading, he remarked : “They make me cringe.”

Here begins the scrofulus “Rights” decision to blame Howard

For the caranage they caused:

Evans declared to the Commission; the Howard Government accepted

“the Marxist dogmas which inspired the trade union movement of the 1880s and 1890s.”

He insouciantly concluded:

“…imbalance-of-power argument used to justify collective bargaining is the last remnant of a “Marxist class-war mindset”.

Unionism in the English speaking world in the 1880s and 1890s was not inspired by Marxism. This is not the first time that Mr Evans has asserted “the entire regulatory edifice of unions, tribunals, employer bodies, is based on the Marxian fallacy of class struggle”. It was the HR Nicholls Society, as above, that ‘conceded imbalance of power’ - from perfect competition.

Evans then accused Cardinal Archbishop Pell of being a neo-Marxist! He recieved it through Aquinas!

Pell is no neo-Marxist - not even protean. Neither were Aristotle, Aquinas, and the scholastics who seminally drove economics. Pell is only in need of sound economic advice. Evans has no excuse for his completely stupid defects in economics and history. For the ostrich “Right”, history begins when, risen each morning, they’ve had their first cup of coffee/ tea.

This is typical of the Right, they are impervious to correction of major mistakes in facts and in explanation (theory). Remarkable. Slothful, intractable, and arrogant clutzes are a few apt adjectives. And cowardice:

Evans, Moore, and the Institute of Public Affairs smeared Howard and Pell in safety; they know as well as anyone else, they were not as Prime Minister and Cardinal Archbishop of Australia in a position to defend themselves and are still not in a position to do so. Other bishops and parliamentarians can but not anyone in their positions is free to engage in such a public exchange.

The trouble is, they have caused great, extensive damage. Their collapse on Co2 taxes and the Greens’ lie Co2 emissions causes global warming draws it out: they don’t give a stuff about the sheer havoc they can wreak on lives of many others, so long as they are at the fore and, in the case of the Centre of Independent Studies and the Institute of Public Affairs, their bank vaults are lined with bundles of cash.

Back to Peter Brown

A. I haven’t met Mr. Jackson. I am not defending him, he demonstrates on Brookesnews that he is very capable of defending what he puts forth. The point is why the mention of Block and Barnett II: Jackson, as an exponent of and theoretician in the Austrian school of economics, reasons from solid principles - theory. He makes predictions from these grounds and they have shown out, demonstrating the soundness of theory he is solidly grounded in. Along with Dr. Shostak, these are the only two fine economists who write for the public and are fighting good causes.

B. I correspond with a couple of economists overseas, who are also very fine. I take their advice. They can’t serve Australians. They have their own countrymen to serve. They can’t engage in Australian affairs, they are engaged in the affairs of their countries.

Here we have in Australia the only site one has come across writing for Australians, from solid economic reasoning and they hurt the Hard Left. They hurt the Right too for the reasons indicated above, and one has banged on about for some years now. The economists I correspond with have no difficulty in concurring with Jackson, and in damning the efforts of the cretinous “Right”. It’s not Jackson, it is what he works from and puts. When I read Block, I read nothing new for it is solidly grounded too.

C. The Institute of Public Affairs in its December edition of the IPA Review, bashed Howard. This was the core of what the edition was for, self-exculpation of their part in the destruction of reform and the election. With the Centre of Independent Studies , this is not the only damage they have caused, damage that is certainly hurting many a Victorian, who now also face blackout because of their rubbish.

D. Stupid people are callous, destructive types. Confined to themselves, they only hurt kith and kin. But when in the Executive and advising, they hurt many.

Defective and worse economics will do this, hurt many Australians, as Co2 taxation will do - thanks to the rotting “Right”. This is of no concern to them. Their concern is themselves.

Truth counts, truth in economics counts, because the impact is great and the ruination can be great when in error. We are talking about the lives of millions of Australians and this lot conduct themselves as narcissistic, shallow, delinquent children do.

E. It is clear where Brown stands. It is clear what he ‘defends’, his completely stupid “Rightwing” heroes. His reaction tells me he is one of them.

‘Labour market wars’, it alludes to the publication, The Labour Market Wars, Jackson, which works through the case and hits targets that had to be hit, and still have to be hit. Go blow bubbles Peter Brown.

I have long mused on the “Right’s” absolutist inclinations. During the last few days, a bombshell was dropped into my hands. A very good source unloaded:

The Victorian Right, who have betrayed and thoroughly wrecked the Liberal Party, have been working hand in glove with the Left to impose a totalitarian regime in Victoria.

Well, that explains the incipiently totalitarian force of many a measure the “Right” have rammed down also when in Federal Office. It is exactly what is also wrong about ‘watermelon red’ “policies”, and their evisceration of the Rule of (Common) Law by displacing it with ‘positive law’. Not to put too fine a point on it but, positive law is a euphemism for the rule of dictators. All this pales before what the “Right” is guilty of in Victoria.

I had originally assumed it was Bracks and Hulls who had converted the State Trustees Office and the Office of Public Advocate into a crime syndicate. This was a false assumption. Sources not only corrected me; they explained how and why Kennett, Stockdale and their advisers did this. This shocking, criminal action against many Victorians, continued by Bracks and Brumby, is not all that the “Right” did.

It was the Kennett Cabinet and their advisers who prepared the anti-Bill of Rights. Whatever alterations Bracks and Hulls made to it are trivial. The “Bill” was fully completed by the Kennett Cabinet and their advisers, inclusive of making it a criminal offence for any Victorians to reassert their inalienable Rights against a criminal, larcenous Victorian regime by resorting to the High Court of Australia.

Things are worse than even the above suggests. While The Kennett administration asserted VCAT was to be a low cost resort in common law, in contrast to the expense of the regular courts, the reality is, they framed much legislation designed to establish VCAT as an enforcer of the diktat of thugs pretending to be MPs. Kennett and his Cabinet also prepared many legislative amendments to alter the Constitution of the Victorian Government, subverting the rule of common law and much else.

Looking at the time frames involved, and the sequence in which Bracks, Brumby, and Hulls (under both of these “Premiers”) introduced the major bills and alterations, it is highly probable the Kennett Cabinet and their advisers also devised the Blasphemy Bill. This squares with another telling detail, drawn out below. Keep in view, not all the totalitarian measures prepared by Kennett and their advisers, put through by Bracks and Brumby, required even a vote in Parliament. Many have been effected through administrative alterations - some major changes to the Constitution were effected under Bracks in this way.

The above also means:

1. The bills, amendments and alterations prepared by the Kennett Cabinet required co-operation with the Left. Thus:

2. Lawyers of both the Liberal Party and the ALP had to be involved in the drafting of each one of the totalitarian measures the treacherous “Right” planned to impose.

3. Despite mutual hatreds between leftie pseud-Liberals and the Pseudo Liberal Right headed by the likes of Kennett, Kroger, Costello, Stockdale, and their Toorak Brahman backers, these measures required cooperation between them, and with the ALP.

The reason for the following is now clear:

1. The Liberal Party has not attacked the ALP over the STO and OPA and fought to uphold the inalienable Rights of the horrendously large number of victims of the Government through those corrupted Offices, because the Liberals were not merely party to it, they set it up.

2. Why they did not attack the anti-Bill of Rights and eviscerate the Bracks cabinet over it; they prepared the Bill. Their objections to the “Bill” were only two: it was Bracks and his Cabinet and not them who rammed it down. The second, as the Hansard transcripts show, was the few, trivial additions to the Bill made by Bracks and Hulls would eliminate the joy of politicians ramming down on Victorians more totalitarian “law”; this objection rested on a point one has made several times before, explained in the next paragraph. That is correct, they were their objections, and now we know why that that is all that they objected to.

3. Why they fully supported the Blasphemy “Law”. To be sure, there were 3-5 Liberal Mps who did oppose it out of how many were there in the Kennett Parliament? Then, under Napthine, and then Doyle?

The question, as far as those lying “dropkicks” is concerned, is what I have drummed home against Bracks and Brumby, they converted Victoria into an absolutist triumvirate of Cabinet, Bureaucrats and Judiciary. The Bracks and Brumby effort is driven by neo-Marxist ideology. Yet, this is what the Kennett Cabinet, and their advisers, that included the CIS and IPA, were planning. Their objection to the anti-Bill of Rights rested on only whether Bracks’ and Hulls’ additions to the Bill in fact made the Judiciary sole dictators. That is correct; as the Hansard record shows, this was their grievance (as it were).

Parliament itself is a court of common law. It’s function is to prosecute the executive - the Cabinet and Ministers when they trend down criminal pathways and reassert inalienable rights, and common law. This function has not simply been completely betrayed by those who infest the Liberal Party but are definitely not Liberals - they are absolutist thugs. They have completely trashed that function and now we know why.

Kennett did not proceed with their totalitarian aims, why? They faced an election, Kennett’s last as Premier. The privilege, the dictator’s joy of enslaving Victorians, went to Bracks, Hulls, Brumby and the likes of Reverendress Bronwyn Pike, whom I now happily call an “Anti-Christ” in the sound meaning of that expression:

Pike is a Reverendress of the Uniting Church. The Apostolic tradition, which in reality is Catholic, entails Apostles do as Christ. The dogma of the Church is its confessional statement, the Creed. Pike is both heretic and anti-Christ. Cardinal Pell should excommunicate Bracks, along with Catholics in the “Right” who are responsible for what is nothing less than criminal actions against Victorians; no man can do all this and pretend they are a Chistian and get away with this falsehood.

A bleak irony is easily detected. Since it is the ALP who rammed down these measures, the lying parasites infesting the Liberal Party and killing it, should they win office, could say this:

‘It was the ALP who did all this. It is nasty, but, it is now “L.A.W.”, and fixed forever and ever’.

Peter Costello, as federal Treasurer used exactly this excuse to explain why he didn’t eradicate many a police state measure contained in the hideous federal Tax regime. He went on to add hundreds of volumes of decrees for good measure. Now we know why.

‘They could say it’. They cannot now, because their corrupt, dirty, rotten little secrets are now out in the open. However, their motivation is not the same as the diseased Left – psychopathic hatred of free, prosperous, capitalist West.

No, the “Right” are venal, ignorant, lust for power, conceited and hold modest Australians in contempt. In the early 1990’s, I was at a function attended by some of these good for nothing boors. They openly joked. ‘We know what it is really about - benign tyranny, the natural, true order, and it is we who must exercise power.’

There is no such thing as benign tyranny. Tyranny is always violent and leads to greater violence. In their conceit and ignorance, they genuinely see nothing wrong at all in it.

Their conflict with the Left is not over the danger the Left poses. No, they and the Left are fighting only over who will wield totalitarian power over all Australians.This suggests why Janet Albrechtsen wrote a disgusting article calling for a Nazi style coup de tat in Australia. It is understandable why the “Right” set about undermining John Howard. Howard’s crime is, he is what they are not - a genuine Liberal in his instincts.

Ladies and Gentlemen, I went into deep shock when my impeccable source dropped the bombshell. I’ve had suspicions. I have puzzled over why the ‘Right’, for all their many defects and rotten antics, show the credentials of absolutists biding their time. Now we know why; that is exactly what they are, and are deliberately working to bring their aims about.

Australians are jammed between the treacherous Left and the treacherous Right. The Left has an excuse, that is what they are ideologically committed to. The “Right” have none at all.

The “Right” have completely betrayed genuinely Liberal Party members, and strangled the Liberal party. Now we know why. Now we know why they show the same attitude to modest Victorians as does the Bracks –Brumby regime. Now we know why they do as the diseased Left does, hold Australians, free markets and all good things in naked contempt. Now we know why they never attack the Left, and continually apologise to them, and are ever so friendly with them, while they smear and defame genuine Liberals.

The Right in Victoria has travelled far down the road towards totalitarianism. They laid the foundations of the Bracks-Brumby neo-Marxist coup-de-tat. With it, the Right, and not simply those retarded, lying leftist slobs, have dealt out very savage, cruel treatment to many a Victorian. This is so shocking that words nearly fail to describe what this lot is.

Stupid people, to repeat, are cruel people. Confined to themselves, they only damage themselves and those close to them. However, as of Government, their cruelty, though they do not realise that that is exactly what they are – stupid, can hurt and ruin many and it has.

It is the lying, treacherous, and totalitarian Right that has destroyed the Victorian Liberal Party. They are also criminally guilty of shocking actions against Victorians.

It is worse than a disgrace. It is worse than a scandal. These are matters which should see the whole lot of them, ‘Liberal’ and ‘Labour’, booted out of Parliament and hauled before courts on major criminal charges. All of them responsible for it. Their advisers too. Of the “Right”, they include any in the IPA and CIS who advised them, and worked on these fraudulent and totalitarian measures. Well, that clears one thing up:

Why the Right and their “thunk tanks” don’t defend free markets. The whole lot of them, including the CIS and the IPA, can get stuffed. They are rotten, vile bastards.

The Right established a large-scale criminal operation in Victoria under -

Jeff “euthanase” the weak and the infirm” Kennett. The man who wished to starve Victorians and Australians by killing food production in Victoria for the fraud of ethanol production (a scheme that hypocrite, Andrew Bolt, supports, as his propaganda for it shows but with the twist, Bolt wishes it embraces prime agricultural land all around Australia).

Under Premier Kennett, the Right corrupted the State Trustees Office and the OPA. The Victorian Government under both Liberal and ALP administrations has been stealing the private property of many Victorians through its agent the State Trustees Office.

It looks like one victim is dead because of what they did. Certainly, the victim disappeared. Those close to the victim have not seen the victim since a day they last saw the victim. Before the victim disappeared, those close went into deep shock at both what was done to their loved relative/close,cherished friend, and the victim’s very evident suffering.

What is committed on a large scale is known all around Victoria by:

For obvious reasons, law firms. Then, doctors. Real estate agents, and other types of auction houses. Professionals who dare defend victims in the Governments Kafkaesque enforcer, VCAT, are smeared, in order to make those who are prinicipled compliant. As documented, attempts are also made to have certain parties compromise their integriety, in order to trap victims permanently.

The STO also hoovers the accounts of aged Victorians who made the mistake of naming the STO as their trustees. Over the weekend, relatives of another aged victim, who had named the STO trustees, related the STO has taken tens of thousands of dollars out of this victim’s accounts - they have finished the ‘trusteeship’. I warned them:

It might not be over. Be careful, they can resort to the “Guardianship Act” to seize total control over the victim and their property again. They went into shock on this hot but true newsflash.

The beneficiary of large scale larceny is the Victorian Government. It is telling the STO was placed by Kennett and co under the Treasurer, and not, where it should be, under the Attorney General - though this is entirely meaningless under the Kennett, Bracks and Brumby administrations.

They activley seek, in ways much like the actions of HEROC, to place as many Victorians as possible under types of Guardianship-Administrative orders. These orders subject victims and their property and victims under absolute control of the Government. This is a compelte perversion, and corruption of the true function of the STO and OPA. Mechanisms used to achieve this include the “Guardianship Act”. These mechanisms were put in place by the Kennett Cabinet, and have since been tightened by Bracks and Brumby to shut any loopholes vicitms could use to re-assert their liberty and property rights.

The Right put all this leglislation in. They did it as a major source of revenue for the Government. Their advisers included the IPA and the CIS.

Having already called for uncompromised criminal investigations into this shocking, systematic, large-scale operation, one has yet to complete the account of what Jennifer and Peter were subjected to. In the articles listed below, one has concentrated on the Bracks and Brumby Cabinets. What the STO is doing might have commenced under Cain and Kirner. What is definite is, the Right, under Kennett and Stockdale, corrupted the STO, and established it as set out in the articles written to date.

So, readers can refresh their memories, and this week, we will complete the account of Jennifer and Peter. Then, we will turn to more shocking revelations, and cases.

The Government of Victoria (Brackistan) is operating a large-scale criminal operation, Pt.1

Documented evidence for ‘Phase I’ of: Victorian Government’s criminal operation and State Trustees Office, and accomplices, and other parties.

Victorian Government has eliminated the inalienable rights of some Victorians

(By some Victorians, I man a very large3 number of Victorians who are victims of this tyrannous regime to which the “Right” is a direct party and partner in).

Victorian Government: Office of Public Advocate caught red handed in commission of major crimes: perverting the course of justice.

It is very likely Kennett and Stockdale were advised to do this by Rightwing think tanks. Two do figure in this very serious criminal operation, the CIS and the IPA.

This is the first of a number of items on the matter to be posted today. These items are dedicated to lifting out the rationale and motivation behind why the Right converted the STO into a vehicle for commission of fraud, theft, and extortion on a massive scale. I refer readers again to the items re-flashed below under the header, The Right established a large-scale criminal operation in Victoria .

It is very likely Kennett and Stockdale were advised to do this by Rightwing think tanks. The main advisers to Liberal Cabinets, State and Federal are the CIS and the IPA. It is no secret they advised Kennett and Stockdale on such matters as ‘privatisation’. What the Right did with the STO was done under the same smokescreen, ‘economic rationalism’.

No-one who has read these items can mistake the substance is grave and lays out serious crimes perpetrated not only by Bracks, Brumby and their advisers, but also by Kennett, Stockdale and their advisers. In concentrating on the case of Peter and Jennifer, it must be kept in clear few, they are only one of many victims of the criminals of the Left and the Right and a number of bureaucrats responsible for this crime syndicate. These are besides those in the STO who run it for them.

It is likely Kennett and Stockdale were advised to do this by Rightwing think tanks. The main advisers to Liberal Cabinets, State and Federal are the CIS and the IPA. It is no secret they advised Kennett and Stockdale on such matters as ‘privatisation’. What the Right did with the STO was done under the same smokescreen of, ‘economic rationalism’, ‘user pays’, ‘Government must be run profitably’ and ‘privatisation’. Sources have come forward and informed of how these tags were applied by the Right to the STO.

The motive was typical of them, to enrich themselves and a “Liberal” administration – the Kennett and Stockdale and their Rightwing establishment backers by keeping them in ‘power’. To enrich themselves and some bureaucrats, they set about relieving many Victorians of their private property. I will explain what they did in the next article, and then the case of Jennifer and Peter will be resumed.

An aspect to what was done, and maintained by Bracks and now Brumby is, it is also the equivalent of the state charging the victims of crime for the apprehension, trial and the costs of imprisonment for the perpetrators. It’s rather kafkaesque the criminals themselves adding injuries to violence they perpetrated and still perpetrate against many Victorians.

I now issue a warning to the Right one has already issued on an early and, it is now vividly clear, mistaken assumption it applied only to Bracks, Brumby, their Cabinet colleagues, bureaucrats involved, their advisers, and those in the STO responsible for the perpetration of the crimes described:

Any attempt to pervert the course of justice is also a major criminal offence. Since it is highly possible that any party from the CIS and the IPA advised Kennett and Stockdale, I warn both Nahan and Greg Lindsay, any attempt to shield any director, employee, or associate who might have been involved is perversion of justice. I am not saying anyone is, I am saying it is possible, in view of the fact of their standing as policy advisers to the Government, and specifically, to the Kennett-Stockdale Cabinets.

I warn both the CIS and the IPA that this time they cannot resort to smearing, sarcasm and such antics, through their marionettes such as Jason Soon, Professor Sinclair Davidson and John Humphreys. While these three dumbkopfs are so dense it is unlikely they can appreciate the gravity of what I have already documented, and will complete the documentation. Unlike these three ignorant, incompetent fools, Nahan and Lindsay can, no doubt, appreciate the substance of the evidence already laid out, and why my call for a thorough criminal investigation into parties of both the Right and Left responsible for this shocking operation euphemistically called the Office of State Trustees.

As it is, it is known all around Melbourne that at least one member of the CIS – IPA was involved, Allan Stockdale.

In view of the fact the ‘free market, liberal think tanks’ have demonstrated their avid support for horrendous measures such as carbon taxes, and their reaction to any criticism of their position on this matter alone, if any more were involved and, under Bracks and Brumby have still been involved, such a discovery would come as no surprise at all. For, of them and their Rightwing backers, it would be merely true to form and in character.

I warn them, justice must be done, those responsible be brought to book, charged, convicted and thrown into prison ( I am not jesting, nor are barristers already contemplating whether to proceed with actions – oh yes, there are some giving this serious consideration). If this means heroes of the Right are convicted and imprisoned then good; it is proper, it is just that they face trial and conviction.

I call upon readers to approach your MP and go for them, but in the right way, by laying out the case to them and demanding of them: What will you do to see justice done not for one couple, but many Victorians?

Ah, one last thing. Now I know why the Right has been loathe to pursue the matter correctly and with vigour; some of their own are culpable of what is perpetrated against many Victorians.

What a joke: The CIS and IPA et al didn’t attack Bracks over his blasphemy law, his Bill of anti-Rights, and much else besides. They find time to promote Stalinist schemes. So, why would this lot of unprincipled, spineless, not Liberal but fascist bastards defend modest Victorians who have been dealt treatment even the Gestapo would have been ashamed of? The closest to it are the defunct USSR and the still in control Stalinist regime of Cuba.

Michael Kroger and Peter Costello are set to job a puppet into a blue-ribbon Liberal seat, the seat Costello will shortly quit, Higgins. The two names they are considering are Kroger’s stick-puppet “Iron Man July” Sheezel, and Kroger-Costello lackey Kelley O’Dwyer.

Julian ” Iron Man July” Sheezel

That Kroger would job Sheezel into a seat has been no secret in Liberal circles for several years now. It has also been no secret that a safe seat would be “Shitzeel’s” reward for service as Kroger’s automaton ‘gofer’ and paid thug. (Oh, that is not correct, he’s Kroger’s thug but members are forced to pay him $5,000 per week. )

Sheezel, after all, besides “cutie pie” Russell Hanan and “potty mouth” Barry, did what Kroger told him, knife Richmond branch in the back and try to cosh Prodos in a dark alley. True, Kroger expected the alley to be dark and not a lit up 104 Exhibition St. and, consequently, Sheezel the “Shitzeel”, as Kroger’s el Presidente of the Victorian Liberal Party had to stew in his juices and weather the exposure of his uglier side - he has a good side?

Well, I suppose, if it were not for that little problem of what Sheezel is, he has a good side. Owners of them find their pet, obese, slobbering lap dogs cute - I don’t, ugly little things that they are. There you have it, I’ve admitted it, Sheezel has a good side to him. Bow-wow.

Since Sheezel has been well covered on Brookesnews and Mangled Thoughts, let’s turn to the hitherto obscure Kelley O’Dwyer.

Kelley O’Dwyer , Kroger-Costello Lackey, and stone cold labour market ‘warriors’

Until now, no-one has heard of an O’Dwyer, let alone noticed her, and studied her -to work out whether she is brain dead, incompetent or just another useful ‘know-it-all’, as so many lawyers are, who stuff all Parties’ parliamentary seats.

Being a lawyer, as Julia Bishop knows, is even almost a qualification to practice brain surgery, and for Peter ‘corrupter of youth’ Garrett physics. It means O’Dwyer must be an authority in economics, certainly labour marker economics.

Actually, since O’Dwyer was an adviser to the Treasurer, a very grave matter is involved. Considered properly, even if she were not a Kroger-Costello lackey, the matter should kill promotion of O’Dwyer as an M.P. in a rock solid Liberal seat.

Joe Cambria wrote on the results of research commissioned by the ACTU. We will return to Mr. Cambria’s article in another item but for now, in the report “the highly experienced US national pollster Vic Fingerhut” included a candid statement on the performance of the Liberal Party and its advisers on their conduct of the campaign for labour market reform:

Despite the incredibly stupid headline in the Financial Review (IR bluster fails to rouse most voters) the figures show that your campaign has made an enormous impact.

These are powerful numbers…

These findings are absolutely devastating for the Government and its advisers, and must surely be cause for considerable alarm among Coalition MPs and Senators.

Costello required sound, accurate economic advice, and complementary advice on how the campaign should be run and he certainly did not receive any such advice.

Finghurt’s damning indictment of the advisers to Cabinet and Ministers thus applies to O’Dwyer. The Indictment is also an indirect way of saying:

The advisers had completely bungled the campaign, which as we know is completely true. It is also true that so many of the MPs and Senators, including Costello, ignorant of economics, did not spot the problem, their advisers, not just the HR Nicholls Society, were selling them snake oil, and they swallowed the snake oil every last drop of it.

Ms.O’Dwyer as an adviser to Costello is, in short, party to the wrecking of the campaign, and thus is party to the defeat of the Coalition this year. That was Mr. Costello’s adviser, too stupid to spot the trouble, too thick to take action to rectify it. And, that woman wants to be a Liberal MP, and not in any old seat, but a blue ribbon seat.

No white-washing Peter Costello’s culpability for that fiasco the Liberal Party’s labour market reform campaign.

Costello himself doesn’t come away from the disaster with clean hands. He is, after all, the man mumblers such as Bolte and McCrann have praised as the “world’s greatest economist”.

If he were, then why didn’t Costello have a clue as to what the true economic case of free labour markets is?

Next, why didn’t he thus send the HR Nicholls Society packing, demanding economic advisers who have a thorough grip on this grave matter?

Indeed, if he were such a great economist, Costello would have been thoroughly familiar with Mr. Gerard Jackson’s work on labour market economics, and a few others besides (- even though those others are in the U.S.).

Just to reinforce the damning detail: Mr. Costello is not only ignorant of the case for labour market reform, he is so in far too many grave matters which means, he his illiterate in economics, and this warrants an item in itself.

“This happy band of incompetent brothers”

So, there was Costello, economic guru, surrounded by gurus, among which lot of duds figures one Ms. O’Dwyer. Together, they sank the campaign, and because of that the election.

That is a brilliant scorecard and recommendation: “Dud for Parliament”. Well, at least O’Dwyer, if she is the one slung into the seat of Higgins, will be free to show her genius in Parliament, every time she opens her mouth.

The Kroger-Costello gang, thugs in action.

Next, while “Shitzeel’s” role in the Kroger-Costello gang is in plain view, it is now a matter for attention:

As a Kroger-Costello supporter, the only conclusion to be drawn is, Ms. O’Dwyer is party to Kroger’s and Costello’s thuggery in Victoria, and the sheer contempt they hold for members, Liberal principles, and for voters in general. In summary, she is party to the Kroger-Costello gang’s wrecking of the Victorian Liberal Party, and now, their aim to do the same federally.

O’Dwyer’s hands are not clean. O’Dwyer is one of them, and thus she too can take her medicine.

In view of O’Dwyers association, she is involved as much as Julian Sheezel is, up to her eyeballs, in the wrecking of the reform campaign, ensuring the defeat of the Liberal Party at State and Federal elections, and in wrecking the Liberal Party. Instead of the prospect of advancement, and further sinecures, the woman should be relegated to the position of mere ordinary member – and that might be a tad too generous.

A one stable, rigged race for the seat of Higgins.

Even if other names are put up, the contest for Higgins isn’t a contest; it’s a two horse race run by one stable, the Kroger-Costello stable.

One nag is doomed to the glue factory, entered only as a pacesetter to guide the other beast out of the starting gates. Who is the glue making material, and who is the race ‘winner’?

My initial view was Sheezel is the jar of clag. Sheezel, after all, is now too much of an embarrassment and thus a liability for Kroger and Costello to hand him Higgins. He would be skinned alive by the ALP in Parliament, to the merriment of voters.

Yet, I’m not so sure now. Considering the above, they might send O’Dwyer to the glue factory instead, and risk ‘Shitzeel’. Kroger did after all, install Helen Kroger in a safe Senate seat.

Costello and Kroger are treating members with contempt and, once again, voters with contempt. They are strangling the Party by ensuring Liberal parliamentary seats, safe seats in particular, are stuffed with their lackeys and cronies. They are also making sure no one of ability and talent can rise in the Party - which, it barely needs stating, would threaten their strangle-hold over the Victorian Liberal Party and their moves to impose an administered dictatorship over the Party federally. It shows:

The Kroger-Costello Gang treating, treating Higgins as they do most seats: their feudal property, free to gift to their faithful henchmen.

Things are bad enough on the federal parliamentary side of things. Coonan, Turnbull, Nelson Cambell, Julia, Bishop, Minchin, Fifield, and Goergiou, are less than impressive Federal MPs as it is. Heaters have to be turned on when they walk into a room. Then there are their coalition colleagues from the National Party, morons such as Barnaby Joyce.

Not content with injecting cretinism, Kroger imposed totally ga-ga stick puppet Helen Kroger. She should be told not to open her mouth at all anywhere in Parliament. She will be worse than an embarrassment to the Party. It is very easy visualising the fun ALP members will have with Helen.

Oh, while she is completely stupid, her brain a very fine example of devolution back through cretinism to amoebic existence, she is also a thug. Rather many Victorian Liberal Party members can attest she is very nasty bit of work. Yes, she brings qualities to the Federal Party, those that might have been fine in stone-age life, and are right up the Kroger-Costello dark alley.

Des Moore; Ray Evans; Hugh Morgan; Doyle; Ted “the Toorak village idiot” Baillieau; John-Calvert-Jones; Sheezel; Minchin; Helen Kroger; and an army of ineffectual, spineless, venal ignorant, unprincipled politicians state and federal; a non stop circus troop of clowns, all singing psalms to their ‘deah leadahs’ Kroger and Costello.

Cemeteries must be filling up with union bosses - they are dying from ceaseless laughter.

The Kroger gang has much more in common with, say, neo-Marxists, or the State Trustees Office, under Attorney General Rob Hulls of Brackistan, the Victorian ALP, than they have with Liberals. Just ask Ron Walker, he’s as happy with Bracks and Brumby as he would be with a red jellybean ‘Liberal’ Cabinet.

Time for Liberals to rebel

All that can be suggested to the members of Higgins, and their Selection Committee is, it is time to stand up and be counted.

Find a candidate worthy of the name Liberal, with guts, energy and ability, and tell Costello and Kroger to jump off the nearest cliff. Don’t be afraid of them; show them your fists and your boots.

After all, those two, and their gang of bloodsucking bludgers, hold you in contempt, as Costello has publicly demonstrated. If that’s not sufficient motivation then, consider who your MP would be, and ponder, you will have to prop up another heavy, useless blob who too holds you in contempt.