Mangled Thoughts

It might as well be the headlines.

The Victorian Liberal Party is a shambles. The narrow cliques that dominate the Party, and feud with each other for power (there is no faction fighting, contrary to the media) are responsible. The disaster stems before the Kennett years. The problem is, the wreckers, in treating members as serfs, have not only betrayed members, they have betrayed Victorians with it.

Their economic illiteracy is matched by no principles and no spine. It is truly shocking to appreciate it was the Kennett Administration in its last term that prepared the antil-Bill of Rights. Under Robert Paper Doyley Doyle, they stood shoulder to shoulder in support of Steve Bracks’ Blashphemy Bill. Indeed, considering the timing it is likely early preparations for this unconstitutional Act were also made under the Kennett Administration. Having raised this possibility many times, it has not been refuted. Then there is the conversion of the STO-OPA into a criminal racket.

The, “Abortion Refom” Bill, which is cognate to the defeated (for now anyway) “euthanasia” Bill, was passed 10/10/08

House divided on question:
Ayes, 23

Mr Barber, Mr Madden, Mrs Coote, MS Mikakos, Ms Darveniza, Mr Pakula, Mr D Davis, Ms Pennicuik, Mr P Davis, Ms Pulford, Mr Eideh, Mr Scheffer, Mr Hal, Mr Tee, Ms Hartland, Mr Thornley, Mr Jennings, Ms Tierney, Mr Koch, Mr Viney, Mr Leane; Tellers - Ms Lovell, Ms Broad

Noes, 17
Mr Atkinson, Mr O’Donohue, Mr Dalla-Riva, Mr Finn, Mrs Petrovich, Mr Drum, Mrs Peulich, Mr Smith, Mr Guy, Mr Somyurek, Mr Kavanagh, Mr Theophanous, Mrs Kronberg, Mr Vogels, Mr Lenders; Tellers: Mr Rich-Phillips, Mr Elasmar

5 Liberals voted for the Bill. They are 5 votes that could have defeated the Bill.

There are three arguments against the Bill:

- It is stated sanctioned, unlimited killing of the defenceless

- It opens the pathway to worse

- It is also another overthrow of real rights. Doctors and nurses who refuse to aid and abet state sanctioned killing of the defencless, and even referals are aiding and abetting is aiding and abetting, will be charged with criminal offences. Even to say anything to discourage anyone from complying or availing themselves of what is a horrifying measure, is a criminal offence under the Act.

Steve Bracks is a liar. He said doctors and nurses are not required to act against their conscience, won’t be committing an offence. Yes they will. But it is worse than this. It is a totalitarian measure coercing doctors to violate their Hypocratic oath. And, it is coercion. It is state police force used against individuals, over-riding, absolutely their freedom, whether they would or not volitionally supply ‘abortions’.

Those 5 Liberals supported a totalitarian, police state measure that mandates coercing doctors and nurses into killing. These are 5 Upper House members, in addition to 5 Lower House Liberal Party members, who support this criminal action by the “Government”. Thus we see a prior failure.

The failure to stand on principles. A failure not only within Parliament, but a failure in also defending them outside of it in public, and also in the Party before the membership who are held in the same contempt by the blobs pretending to be Liberal MPs as do Kroger and his Brahman backers. Unmitigated gutlessness is the word.

Though the Liberal Party is dominated by economic ignoramuses, including the likes of Peter Costello (and he is an ignoramus), Michael Kroger, Red Ted and Kennett and their backers,it might be expected that they would at least assert common law. Not a bit of it. Common law upholds and advances real rights but its ground is absolute property rights, and economic free action. The dead in the water “Right” have never defended this.

Not only the Victorian Liberal Party, but the Federal Party has been trampled over by statists who only give a stuff about themselves and their lust for power. Their treachery against Victorians over the ant-Bill of Rights, the Blasphemy Act, the STO-OPA and now this, sums it up. They ,in some telling respects, no better than the ALP. They have, as a consequence, handed another major victory to the diseased Left.

They are a bloody disgrace. They are not fit to be Liberal Party members let alone MPs. They should join a Party rather more familar to them, the Greens Nazi Party; this is how good the blobs and the neptotistic “Right” are. After all, they have also given their full support to “watermelon red measures”; egged on by the likes ofToorak Doctors’ wives and bimbos called lawyers such as fascist Malcolm Turnbull. “Euthanasia” and the abortion Bill are also aims of the Nazi Green Party and the camotose “Right” obliged them once again. Callous, ignorant, gutless, unprincipled, venal slobs

A word to Steve Edwards

In the exchange over, Next reply to Mr. Steve Edwards, I left his last comment unremarked to some rainy day. This is the day.

1. “Sadly, there was no evidence supplied for any connection between the CIS and the Kennett Government’s “criminal STO scheme” that you wrote about.”

The Kennett administration was advised by CIS and the IPA. Any criminal investigation, that must be undertaken, will examine any involvement, if any, of IPA and CIS in the conversion of the OPA and STO, but because they were advisers to that Cabinet, this means they cannot be ignored in what is fully warranted.

2. “a gigantic conspiracy to steal land from Victorians?”

I see, ‘conspiracy theorist’. Let’s get this absolutely crystal clear: Right from the day the Kennett administration and their advisers converted the STO and OPA into what they are today, the Government has seized private property from victims. It is on a massive scale. It is evident that Mr. Edwards, typical of the sneering “Right”, doesn’t give a stuff about the victims of what the callous, ignoramuses pretending to be genuine Liberals and free marketeers did and what is still perpetrated on a massive scale.

3.”…do you continue to defame the CIS and Greg Lindsay…”

I’m not defaming any of them, quite in contrast to how Mr. Edwards’ gutless chums smear, for example, Mr. Jackson. It is about major criminal activity, conducted by ther Government of Victoria, how it was sett up, and everyone, from then through to today, involved must be followed up, and charges be levelled where they shopudl be. Any involvement of the CIS and IPA is a matter for investigation, a thorough criminal investigation conducted by incorruptible, principled, tough detectives. It is that serious.

4. “I am not “shilling for the Establishment Right”

Oh yes he is. A very large number of Victorians, many more added each year are victims of these criminal operations, set up under the Kennett administration, and the Kennett administration took its advice from the IPA and the CIS. Mr. Edwards’ concern and it is typical of the treacherous, venal, cowardly, unprincipled, myopic Right, is all about butt protection; theirs.

Edwards is flying cover for a pack of Statist cretins who ruin lives, who have caused great damage, because as well as being Statists, they hold modest Australians and genuine Liberal principles in contempt. Edwards can deny it, but the mnan in the street say just these very things. They identify the arrogant “Right” with the genuine Liberal Party and what it stands for. It is why Edwards, members are still leaving the Party, and voters.

It is why, Edwards, there is now a Rudd Fascist Cabinet. It is why Bracks was elected and Victoria is now not only Brackistan but a charnal house for good measure. It is all due not merely to the blobs and fascists wrecking the Liberal Party. It is also due to the incompetent, unprincipled illiterates with which Greg Lindsay and the Kemp family have stuffed the CIS and IPA.

Bye the bye, Professor Sinclair Davidson, another spineless, backstabbing fishwife, is yet to defend what he supports, the CIS’ demand for carbon tax destruction day. He is yet to answer the matter of the inverse of the ‘J’ curve. Oh, and Professor Saunders, whose defence of capitalism is so bad only the hard Left appreciated it, those who weren’t put into a deep sleep by it that is. Saunders’ efforts can be peddled as substitues for anesthetics and sleeping tablets.

Neither CIS and IPA has defended free markets at all. Neither have they promoted and used those who can. Instead, over a more than a couple of decades they have expended their energy smearing those who can. For good measure, they have the media cheer squad of those clowns Tim Blair, Janet Albrechtsen and Andrew Bolt.

The above, Mr. Edwards, is only one more abysmal symptom of the affliction that is the pustular “Right” and the anti-free market think tanks IPA and CIS.

Is the bill constitutional, as the other anti-Rights Bills, constitutional is now the last line of defence. If it is allowed, what will come next is the ‘euthanasia Bill’. Though defeated in Victoria, if the abortion Bill is not overthrown, by the High Court, it will be reintroduced. David Davis himself said it would have been passed if it had been worded the “right way”. The Germans went down this road, 1870’s to Nazi Germany and the T4 program.

It’s real, and it is state ordered murder.

The Bracks and Brumby, Orwellian titled “ABORTION LAW REFORM BILL” (2008) was passed in the lower House last week. It was put through without debate. Cabinet banned debate in Parliament on the Bill. Its cognate bill, the Bill for killing of the defenceless euphemistically called, Medical Treatment (Physician Assisted Dying) Bill 2008, was defeated on the 10th of this month. The only difference between the two bills is:

Who can be killed under each bill.

The crucial terms of each Bill were related in,

“There is a certain stench of death in this building today….”

Under each bill, it is a criminal offence for any doctor and nurse to refuse to commit killing of anyone prescribed for killing. This includes doctors and nurses who, understandably refusing to kill, refuse to refer a ‘patient’ to those who are prepared to kill.

The reasons why the killing of the born bill was defeated was because debate and free ‘conscience’ voting was permissable and it is obvious why. If, as the abortion bill, it had been rammed through Parliament most Victorians, not only doctors and nurses, would have realised the truth of the bill and would have gone for the jugular of the Cabinet.

Brumby threw in a pretence. To ensure culpability could not be sheeted home to him and his Cabinet of absolutist thugs, should it be passed, they sponsored the bill as a private members bill. They gave their support to a member of the Greens Nazi Party, one Colleen Hartland MLC. Secondly, allowed debate and a “conscience vote”. It is a cognate bill, and both Bracks and Brumby are guilty, more so since it was they who prepared the abortion bill when Catholic Steve Bracks was Premier. Mr. Fascist Slob pretending to be a saint Mr. Steve Bracks enthusiastically supported the abortion bill.

Cardinal Archbishop George Pell never said a word. Neither did he condemen Liberals under Kennett for preparing the anti-Bill of Rights, the Blasphemy and Kowtow to Mulism Fascists Bill, and the Let’s turn the STO-OPA into a crime syndicate Bills, all implemented and carried on by Steve Bracks and John Brumby and their Cabinet of lying parasites. Now that nice Mr. Christian and Devout Catholic Steve Bracks is not Premier, the Church is condemning both bills and has declared its hospitals in Victoria will be shutdown should the bill pass the upper house.

A Digression

I notice the Church is not also attacking another very obvious totalitarian overthrow of the real rights of individuals. Why not? Discount the neo-Marxist thugs that have corrupted various offices and associations of the Church, there is no excuse for the “Orthodox’s” failure to mount a hard offensive on all counts. None what so ever.

The Church Catholic asserts the dignity and liberty of individuals above all else and this includes collectivist thugs - including Fascist Kevin Rudd another pseudo-Catholic. Why the cowardice, with all respect to Cardinal Archbishop Pell? You do, George, recollect a conversation on A’Beckett and the point I drew your attention to?

Freedom of the individual, George, freedom in economic action, property rights, the individual was in contention, not A’Beckett’s sanctity. I’ll go further, George, A’Beckett failed badly in these matters and in his failure sapped the King who adavanced these grave priorities by binding the crown to upholding the rule of Coomon Law- exactly what has been overthrown around Australia and crushingly in Victoria.

The above is the sort of Nazi policies, plus the Greens’ Death Cult that can be and are the upshot. Styling yourself, George, on A’Beckett, you might care to rectify his very bad mistake. At least you now have a common motive.

What has transpired in Victoria is what I have warned of in the past, it is also an assault on the freedom of the Church. However, since the clerical ranks include the likes of those who have wrecked the Liberal Party, know it all illiterates, the orthodox have never defended anything worth defending. It is called defeat by self-inflcited stupidity and cretinism due to, the senior ranks are drawn from the same two closed gene pools the necortic right and diseased Leftists such as Bracks and Rudd are drawn from. What, for example, Fisher, Chifley and Curtin, terrors of the diseased Left! Good jokes, George.

I have not altogether digressed; only slightly digressed. Rather topical really,and not only on this grave matter.

The Bills are ordered to giving the appearance of legitimacy to State ordered murder

That doctors and nurses commit criminal offences if they co-operate in any way. The Bills explicitly set out, the “State” orders them to kill on pain of criminal prosecution. All other translations of the Bills are excluded by the terms of the Bills, the “State” orders them to kill, or co-operate in killing, even by “referrals”.

In the name of Victorians, the bloody socilaist slobs in Spring Street, and their equals in the Opposition, ignorant, unprincipled Statist slobs pretending to be Liberals, will turn doctors and nurses into murderers. It’s not whom and when killed, and when ‘requested’. It is the fact all doctors and nurses must kill that is decisive. This, this makes these bills Bills for the execution of “State”pordered murder.

It is not “State” santioned killing, leaving such horrific acts to the discretion of individuals. It directs all to engage in each act. This is deliberate murder by the “State” by use of police state powers to force, on pain of punishment, all doctors and nurses to commit the deeds.

It is stark naked that every politician and bureaucrat who supports these bills, instead of forcing doctors and nurses to do it, and without the fiction of ‘legalistic’ paperwork, should:

Have the guts of their intent and walk into hospitals and homes and murder all those they decide should be killed, and face the consequence before a stiff in common law and uncompromising Judge. This is what the two bills are about.

The Premier of Victoria, John Brumby is a Liar

On radio this week, he said any who from conscience cannot commit State ordered murdered are not required to do so. Liar. They are, by aiding and abetting even if only by refusing to recommend others perpetrate “State” ordered murder. Refusal to refer to those prepared to kill is a criminal offence, as is also attempts to prevent it - even by word alone.

Neil Mitchell is committing fraud

Thanks to the nepotistic Right, there are no genuine, gutsy Liberals in the media. 3AW was recommended to me as an answer to hard Left news outlets. Wrong! The differences between it and, say, ABC are:

- Sodding taxpayer doesn’t have to pay for their drivel.

-ABC disc jocks, though ignoramuses too, pretend to be intelligent and cultivated. 3AW disc jocks don’t, thankfully, entertain a whiff of these pretensions.

Derryn Hinch, pro-abortion, has struggled with the force of the abortion bill. His Kampf was short and feeble. On air one day, he simply asserted his stock line, “it’s a woman’s right to choose”.

Neil Mitchell, last week was nasty to a caller who related the Bills are what the Nazi Party did. Mitchell replied, “Rubbish and nonsense!”. The ignoramus, Mitchell, should apologise to 3AW listeners for perpetration of a false account of history and thus cheating them. This morning, however, he was caught out by a GP:

Dr Gross, GP, was born deformed and declared, ‘this is what the Nazis did’. She is definitely not Catholic and might be an atheist. She put up a sign outside her practice: ” I do not perform abortions. Neither do I refer patients to those who do.” She continued, “if the Bill is passed in the Upper House next week, I will defy it.”

This caught Mitchell out. Being a GP, he did not attack her, unlike the ordinary caller. He did, though, still deny it. This makes the man a liar, because, pretending to be engaged in the ‘debate’ and contributing to the ‘debate’, he is unmistakeably refusing to allow history to intrude into what he and Hinch are effectively doing, running propaganda on behalf of “State” ordered murder.

Yet, we do not have to look only to the past. We also have the charnal house called the Netherlands as an example. Chirldren are now being murdered. The Dutch Government is committing what the Nazis did, killing all deemed unfit to have been born, and to live. That’s right, State directed murder of children up to early adolescent age ( 11 years of age), and up to the elderly.

If the Abortion Bill is passed, the euthanasia bill will be reintroduced and passed

They are cognate bills. The Nazis didn’t invent their ‘euthanasia’ progrom, T4. The ground had been prepared duriong the late 19th century to the 1930’s. Diseased Leftists had successfully pumped their horrendous notions under propaganda cliches, ‘merciful deaths’, ‘end of suffering’, ‘it would be cruel to let them live’ ( i.e. malformed unborn), and so forth.

The pin was the cult of nature and this, as then, is a “State” cult but today it is called “environment(alism)”, with the equation of man and animals. The stock cant phrase today is, ” we kill wounded animals, so why can’t we be put out of our pain too?”

Who is running this infantile propaganda campaign? The so-called answer to hard left broadcasters namely SBS and ABC, 3AW is one station that is. Where are the ‘heroes’ of the camotose “Right”. They are camotose - “No time for this, it doesn’t pay. Besides, it means we’d have to stick our necks out in public.”

What a disgrace.

The abortion bill, if passed, will be run for a couple of years before reintroducing its cognate.

The reason is obvious. The defences of Victorians will be broken down, they having been inured to “State” ordered murder of the unborn. Look at many another bill passed but a matter of years before was rightly attacked for what they still are, Statist usurpation of freedoms.

It’s the principle of erosion. Water on rock grinds rock over time - if there is no active defence. This is what those fascist bastards leading the “Republican” movement, including Malcolm Turnbull, are counting on, as have the Nazi Greens Party - and look what the unprincipled cowards of the “Right” alone have delivered to these diseased, lying Leftists.

Red Ted Baillieu and the dancing blobs

They are what is palmed off as Liberal Party MPs. Some of them did oppose the “euthanasia” bill. David Davis ( Upper House), however, stated it would have passed if it had been drafted correctly. There is a right why to make, by police state coercion, doctors and nurses murderers?!

Passage of the ABORTION LAW REFORM BILL 2008

The Lower House divided Ayes 49, Noes 32, as follows and with Liberal Party Members in bold:

Ms Allan; Mr Andrews; Ms Asher; Mr Baillieu; Ms Barker; Mr Batchelor; Ms Beattie; Mr Brooks; Mr Brumby; Mr Carli; Mr Crutchfield; Ms Duncan; Mr Eren; Mr Foley; Ms Green; Mr Hardman; Dr Harkness; Mr Helper; Mr Herbert; Mr Holding; Mr Hudson; Mr Ingram; Ms Kosky; Mr Lim; Mr Lupton; Mrs Maddigan; Ms Morand; Mr Morris; Ms Munt; Mr Nardella; Ms Neville; Mr Noonan; Ms Overington; Mr Pallas; Mr Pandazopoulos; Mr Perera; Ms Pike; Mrs Powell; Ms Richardson; Mr Robinson; Mr Scott; Mrs Shardey; Mr Stensholt; Ms Thomson (Footscray); Mr Trezise; Ms Wooldridge; Mr Wynne. Tellers: Ms D’Ambrosio; Mr Langdon.

Ms Pike is Bronwyn Pike, who is a Uniting Church Reverendess. Then again, she is one of the diseased, neo-Marxist dribbling Leftists who have made their fortunes preaching against Christ and destruction of the bad old capitalist West.

I recollect a gaggle of clerics in ‘training’ saying, when it the first time she stood as an ALP candidate was announced , “Now, all will see what a real Christian can do.”. The name Christ being code for Marx neofied by these middle-calls-wealthy-spoilt-brats-idiotenlumpenmasse.

Louise Asher - The Victorian Liberal Parliamentary Party’s version of the Federal’s Julie Bishop. These two can arrange an ‘exchange trip’, no-one could tell the difference between them if they occupied each other’s seats.

NOES 32

Mr Blackwood; Mr Burgess; Mr Cameron; Ms Campbell; Mr Clark; Mr Crisp; Mr Delahunty; Mr Dixon; Mr Donnellan; Mr Hodgett; Mr Hulls; Miss Kairouz; Ms Lobato; Mr McIntosh; Mr Merlino; Mr Mulder; Dr Napthine; Mr Northe; Mr O’Brien; Mr Ryan; Mr Seitz; Mr Smith (Bass); Mr Smith (Warrandyte); Mr Thompson (Sandringham); Mr Tilley; Mrs Victoria; Mr Wakeling; Mr Walsh; Mr Weller; Mr Wells. Tellers: Mrs Fyffe; Mr Kotsiras.

16 Liberals out of 21 voted no. The two Liberal tellers being tellers on the vote could not, of course vote. Perhaps it’s a turn up. Ted’s in a minority of 5. It’s 5 too many and we will serve up why in a separate article, it doesn’t simply turn on state ordered murder.

We shall wait for next week’s Upper House vote before writing up the item - after all, as David Davis (who ruins a perfectly good blue ribbon seat in that House) indicated, there is sufficient support for “State” ordered murdered of the defenceless born. It’s conditional on only a Bill for it beings framed the right way. It’s rather like ‘wannabe’ Fuhrer, Malcolm Turnbull, and his ministers such as idiot Greg Hunt and sellout Ian MacFarlane, who chirrup gaily daily, “capital destruction by Co2 taxes is good if they are implemented the “right way”.

Needless to say, the diseased Left plumped for State ordered murder of the defenceless en-mass and, if he were still in Parliament and since he raised it, so would have Steve Bracks. Ha! The daddy of Brackistan was “represented” by Red Ted, making it a 50 to 32 division.

Thus Mr Finn MLC (Liberal Party) commenced his speech against the “euthanasia” Bill. It was given an orwellian name:

Medical Treatment (Physician Assisted Dying) Bill 2008

State ordered killing is not only medical treatment but the finest expression of the Hippocratic oath! Many doctors took exception and wrote strongly worded protests to MsP against the Bill.

The Bill was defeated last week (10/9/08) 25 to 12. A comprehensive defeat, but it was a far closer run thing than the raw numbers suggest.

One of the blobs the scrofulous Right have jobbed into Liberal Party seats, Mr. David Davis, explained the next morning that the bill had not been drafted properly. He continued that if it were sent to the ‘Law Reform Commission’ (code for jackbooted thugs but this is entirely lost upon Davis) and rectified by these Kommissars, it would be passed.

Yes, it wasn’t merely a rumour, a Bill for State ordered killing was put before the Victorian Parliament. The reason why is clear enough. Examined properly it is cognate to the “Abortion Bill”. The former was raised as a ‘private member’s Bill’. It was raised, unsurprisingly by a Party of diseased Leftists, the Greens, through one Colleen Hartland MLC.

It was also totalitarian in scope for good measure, as the Orwellian abuse of language reinforces and entrenches. Consider, for example:

Section 9: No . duty to assist – A doctor is not under any duty to provide assistance under this Act but must inform the sufferer that other doctors may be willing to provide assistance. A doctor who fails to do so is guilty of an offence. Penalty – 5 penalty units

Clause 9(1): doctors who decline to provide assistance under the Bill ‘must tell the sufferer that other doctors may be willing to provide assistance’

clause 9(2): health care providers who do not provide assistance under the Bill must, on request, transfer a full copy of the patient’s relevant medical records to the new health care provider

Section 10: professional organizations and associations must not apply prejudicial pressure or penalties for things done by someone lawfully under the Bill. (The restraint also applies to health care providers, but not to providers that do not permit their facilities or associations to provide assistance under the Bill.)

Non-victimisation – Provides that a professional organisations or associations must not censure or discipline or subject to other penalty or loss, a person who assists or refuses to assist a sufferer end their life.

The expansion of clause 10 is, “prejudicial pressure or penalties for things done by someone lawfully under the Bill.”

clause 11: no-one may try to resuscitate a person who takes a drug to end his or her life pursuant to the Bill

If it had been passed, it would be a criminal offence for doctors and nurses in any hospital to refuse to aid in the killing of anyone recommended for killing (and this is the force, the selection of defenceless individuals for state ordered killing). Contrary to what those who drafted the Bill, and those who supported it in Parliament claim, doctors and nurses in being compelled to recommend those who are willing to execute State ordered killings would be by naked Government compelled to aid and abet what would be shocking crimes ordered by the administration of Brackistan.

Now this is what we have in in the Bracks-Brumby abortion Bill, state ordered killing of the defenceless, but in the womb. That is what it is, sucxking the brains out of babies, trying to poison them and if they do not die in the womb, as is done in other countries, they are strangled or cast aside to die slowly. It also has an Orwellian title:

Abortion Law Reform Bill 2008

Again, this Bill if it is passed makes it a criminal offence for doctors and nurses to refuse aiding and abetting state ordered killing of babies. Clause 8 spells this out:

“Obligation to refer woman despite conscientious objection of practitioner

“Imposes a referral obligation on registered health practitioners who have a conscientious objection to abortion. A health practitioner must refer the woman to another registered health practitioner who the practitioner knows does not have a conscientious objection to abortion.

“Obligation to perform or assist in emergency abortions to preserve life of pregnant woman despite conscientious objection of practitioner or nurse

“Notwithstanding a conscientious objection, a registered medical practitioner is under a duty to perform an abortion, and a registered nurse is under a duty to assist in the performance of an abortion in an emergency where the abortion is necessary to preserve the life of the pregnant woman.”

Observe this chilling section:

9]. Repeals section 10 of the Act dealing with the offence of child destruction.

Notes: 1. Section 10 of the Crimes Act 1958 provides –

Offence of child destruction

(1) Any person who, with intent to destroy the life of a child capable of being born alive, by any wilful act unlawfully causes such child to die before it has an existence independent of its mother shall be guilty of the indictable offence of child destruction, and shall be liable on conviction thereof to level 4 imprisonment (15 years maximum).

(2) For the purposes of this section evidence that a woman had at any material time been pregnant for a period of twenty-eight weeks or more shall be prima facie proof that she was at that time pregnant of a child capable of being born alive.

Rule of (Common) Law overthrown
For the umpteenth time, in clause 11:

“Rule of common law abolished
New section 66 formally abolishes any rule of common law creating an offence in relation to procuring a woman’s miscarriage”

This is is only one more bit of hard evidence : the increasing lawless of the Executive, and in this case with murderous intent.

When is a baby not a baby but a fetus and a fetus a baby?

The answer is whether it will be killed. If it is to be killed, then it’s a fetus. This is another monstrous abuse of lanaguage but these are the sort of expressions which the boosters use to justify the move towards state coerced killing of the unborn. Here is a chilling instance:

Twiddling the radio tuner Sunday evening stopped at an exchange between Dr Sally Cockburn who also goes under the vile nom de plume, Dr Feelgood. She and her ‘panel’, which included Kommissar of “Health” Beth Wilson. Wilson is a lawyer (surprise, surprise). Her Monash University PR blurb discloses her career has been one long burden to long suffering Victorian taxpayers. They are pro state ordered killing. Cockburn once compared abortion to removing haemorrhoids. During their shallow ‘discussion’, they interchange fetus and abortion depending on whether a baby is to be killed or not.

“Cockburn…says when someone comes to her surgery with a lump on the bum she…”

One of the ‘panel’ declared, ‘more babies survive today than in the past.’ Her point was, abortion reflects nothing more than mortalioty rates in vitro. Hang on a sec:

Entrepreneurs invented the first great life-saver, disinfectant. This resulted in a great reduction deaths. They then resolved how to supply new medical procdures and how to deliver them at increasingly lower prices (contrast socialist schemes such as Medicare which is very costly as the growing, long waiting lists for surgey telling reflects). Free markets and entreprenuers overcame what was a devestating blight in the past. Now we have dumbkopfs saying, ‘bring on the good old days through state ordered murder’!

Anti-Bill of Rights

It came as a shock to learn it was the Kennett Administration prepared the anti-Bill of Rights. The timing of this Bill indicates the Kennett Administration might also have prepared the Blasphemy ‘Act’. This is all on top of what they did with the STO and OPA.

While state ordered killing is an aim of the diseased Left, they have made major inroads only because of the myopic, statist Right, and thier defective economics. The grounds of the rule of common law is property rights and free economic action. It is out of these real rights are generated and thus the dignity and freedom and life of the individual is advanced. The Right haven’t failed badly on these grave matters. They are a massive intellectual and moral failure.

What has occurred in Victoria has been extensive inroads into real rights, with the upshot:

The STO and OPA is engaged in systematic larceny.
Larceny to prop up alternative energy ’scams’, and desalination plant (instead of genuine free market massive dams on rivers)
Billions squandered on Sports and entertainments

And the real Rights of Victorians ground under the feet of Statist morons and thugs. And this bleak comedy is played out in the two Bills. Under the anti-Bill of Rights, so long as a Bill meshes with that pack of elastic garbage, it’s ok and that is what is to be found in these two Bill, state ordered murder is ok becaase it can be meshed with the anti-Bill of Rights. Notice also:

By appeal to that bog paper, the anti-Bill of Rights, politicians absolve themselve of culpability for the genuinely criminal overthrow of real rights and any malevolent scheme they dream up. “It was me, it was the Bill of Rights that made me do it that’s wot”, and this the tenor of the sentimental rubbish spewed out by all behind those Bills for state ordered killing. They remain culpable.

It must not be ignpored, under the abortion ‘Bill’, it is a crime for any doctor and nurse to refuse to do as the administration dictates.

The abortion bill has been passed in the Lower House but is yet to be put to the Upper House. Under this Bill, doctors and nurses face automatic prosecution if they do not do as the slobs in Spring Street dictate, and this Bill recieved support from some of the Blobs.

The Bills are cognate. It is no accident at all that they were introduced and debated roughly simultaneously. Little dictatorial parasites enrich themselves while having effectively reduced Victoria to a one party State, and only a few short steps from outright absolutism. For good measure, to ensure the complete debauchment of Victorians, they gaily render it also a charnal house.

The best the camotose Right can do is bleat like Mary’s bloody little lamb. Well, lamb belongs on barbecues, in ovens, and in frying pans for a tasty gnosh up. Meanwhile “Red” Ted Baillieu and Michael Kroger continue to strip the Party of anyone who could be merely accused of holding genuine Liberal Principles. Just to check, here is Komrade Ted in action, purifying the Party:

RED TED: Leader’s office shrieks “Death to America” in between faction fights

While their clunker tanks, the HR Nicholls Society, the Institute of Public Affairs, and the Centre for Independent Studies continue to fatten themselves at taxpayers expense and at the expense of Liberal Party members. More lamb to be roasted.

This, as a running subject, is now tagged Charnal house.

Andrew Landeryou has disclosed this interesting bit of news:

“COURAGEOUS: MP’s career on the line as Labor’s Left faction subverts conscience vote with abortion decree

Labor’s Socialist Left faction in Victoria has issued a directive to all of its state members of Parliament that they must vote in favour of the bill decriminalising abortion regardless of their personal views.

Their move is seen by ALP insiders as a repudiation of the government’s approach that the bill be decided as a “conscience vote”.”

It comes as no surprise, and the reason why it has come to this is straightforward too:

The truth is the bill should not have even been contemplated. What will follow this, if passed, will be ‘euthanasia’, the extension of state sanctioned killing of those still in the womb to the defenceless; the aged, the handicapped, and why not those with grave diseases?

It is, moreover, state sanctioned killing which will eventually lead to state ordered killing. Now what do we see? This was stated on radio a couple of weeks ago:

“If the Bill is passed, the next step will be to steer an ‘euthanasia bill’ through the Victorian Parliament.”

Deadlier, as we have had cause to note, the Rudd administration is looking to the backdoor route, the States’ Parliaments, to achieve this, as related in:

Rudd Cabinet is pressing for State sanctioned killing, euphemistically called euthanasia

I fail to see how High Court Judges could rule the NT euthanasia act was lawful. When is state sanctioned killing, apart from death penalties for dangerous criminals and thus an entirely different matter, lawful? ‘Regulation’ and ‘legalisation’ of any matter is not the rule of law. They are an attack on the rule of law.

How could the High Court even consider State sanctioned killing is lawful. Indeed, how can it consider those responsible for that ‘Act’ as law abiding, decent Australians because this is what the diseased cretins in the NT Parliament are not?

Now what Catholic in name Steve Bracks prepared and now Brumby is pressing, their ‘abortion bill’, is State sanctioned killingt of babies. This is exactly what it is, the killing of fully developed babies, of individuals. To reinforce this crucial point, I’ve just listened to an American woman on the radio.

She survived an attempt to kill her in late term. What is worse, she has investigated late term abortions in America, and the findings are truly appalling. How does this sound? Babies finished off by strangulation. Others thrown aside to finish dying. Here is the punch line, she is not the only survivor of attempted state sanctioned killing of the unborn. She related there is a surprisingly large number of survivors.

Common law is the rule of law, and it is generated out of its grounds, absolute property rights. From this, free economic action, and it is these real rights that are grounds of the rule of law. This also means the individual. It is these real rights that are being overthrown.

Brackistan is already a one Party State, as the article article on the condition of the Victorian Liberal Party puts beyond question, Liberal Party News: The Victorian Division is stone dead (1/9/08). Brackistan is far down the road to absolutism, as the sheer number of “Acts” that overthrow real rights shows. In this respect, the Bill of anti-Rights is a mere formalisation of what is the case. Now we have the Rudd fascist Cabinet on top heading down the same road.

The treacherous Left are fond of telling the lie the Nazi regime and its mass murder progroms were generated out of Germany’s “Right”. Entirely false; it was a Leftist movement. Secondly, the Nazis did not invent euthanasia and eugenics.

The rise of National Socialism was the culmination of some 60 years of sliding down that road, commencing with Bismarck’s Statist policies. Bismarck believed his approach would defeat socialism. He was not only wrong; his policies prepared the way for absolutism.

On the Nazi progrom, readers might refer back to this, and linked articles:

Hard Left Fronts advocate legalised murder of children

As for the Nazis’ mass extermination of the defenceless, T4, this site summarises what they did:

Shoah education

The cults of nature, with the equation of animals with man, and nation were central to the descent into what was nothing less than a progrom in mass murder of the defenceless. The roots of these cults are in pseudo-philoposphy during the 17 to the 19th century. Over the same trends in theology, the Lutheran Church split mid 19th century. Some Lutherans, so disturbed by the developments, left Germany forever. They migrated to Australia.

Classical liberals, including theologians, were smeared not simply by the hard Left but also by the Right. They were accused of being naive simpletons. There was, though, a problem.

Many of them lacked the bulwark required to defeat central planning and the diseased Left. That is, sound, free market economics. How remarkable, today’s Australian Right are void in this crucial armoury. Unlike the German Classical Liberals, these guys have no excuse what-so-ever for their appalling defection.

“Bismarck believed his approach would defeat socialism…”

It is also what Australia’s ignorant “Right” have done over a couple of decades. Now that they are in Opposition, States’ and Federal Parliaments, they are still at it. Neither can their strong authoritarian, statist inclinations be ignored. They are ably supported in all this by the buffoons in the Centre for Independent Studies, The Institute of Public Affairs, and the HR Nicholls Society.

The sheer damage these three plunker tanks of cranks alone have caused is incalculable. Where’s the good Professor Sinclair Davidson’s explanation? Readers eagerly await his account of why all the damage that they have caused and continue to wreak is good for Australians. Davidson can’t be a coward?

What the abortion bill and the push for euthanasia in both Brackistan and now by the Rudd administration is, is not only state sanctioned killing of the defenceless. It is also a major assault on the freedom and dignity of all Australians. An assault involving the deliberate debauchment of Australians, and to make modest Australians as culpable as they are for this shocking, disgusting descent.

Oh, yes, deception is involved in the lie that ir has the support of the modest man in the street. The tactics used that led to the Nazi progroms are the same as those used today. A persistent whittling away at the defences of the man in the street, combined with ensuring opponents were smeared and not heard, to the extent it was possible prior to 1933.

The Innoculated “Right’s” response

“Red” Ted Baillieu and the “blobbies” see nothing wrong with the ‘abortion’ bill. The “Rightwing” kerplunker tanks, as is their daily routine, are dead in their plush graveyards. It is not that they are merely incompetent in economics and defending free markets. They have no moral compass whatsoever. The Centre for Independent Studies lobbying for the destruction of Australians through Co2 taxation is another obscene indication of this.

Here we are witnessing the diseased, treacherous Left about to gain another major victory against Australians and it is all due to the venal, narcissistic, unprincipled cowards who are the ‘Right’ and are not the genuine Liberal Party of not only Victorian but also Australia wide. If these clowns had not seized control of the Liberal Party, and real talent had been promoted as MPs and advisers, the Left would not be where it is today, they would have been dead and buried long ago. Needless to say, there would be no pushes for monstrous measures.

The truth is, modest Australians loathe the left. Victorians make plain daily that they despise Bracks and Brumby and their diseased Leftist, absolutist creature called Brackistan. However, when they look at what is to the fore in the name of the Liberal Party, they see nothing better than a pack of insular clods muttering village idiot-like noises, “foine, foine, foine… can I have a lolly now?”, and give the thumbs up to increasingly naked absolutist measures. Victorians and Australians are in great peril because of this lot. Victoria and Australia are at risk of being reduced to another charnal house built out of ‘credentialled’ state ordered murder.

NB.

Media commentators have it completely wrong. Of diseased Leftists in the media the reason why is obvious. The point to observe is:

It is completely false the notion that the matter is a debate over “pro-choice” versus “pro-life”. This false stress is part of the hard Left’s weaponry used to break down resistance. This is the gambit of diseased Lefitsts, contrary to Mr. Derryn Hinch.

Hinch for example, is “pro-choice”. Recently, however, he did admit on radio that abortion “is the deliberate killing of the unborn”. Hinch is shallow, because if he worked through what follows from the admission, he would not be using 3AW as platform to boost the abortion bill. He would be vociferously attacking it.

What is crucial about the above? Hinch’s audience is the man in the street, whom the venal necrotic “Right” hold in contempt. Hinch should examine why Andrew Landeryou’s sites are a favourite of the man in the Street, and thus why the diseased Left are pushing to have his sites shut down.

Hinch is eminently qualified to be a ‘gun’ in the HR Nicholls Society, the Institute of Public Affairs, and the Centre for Independent Studies.